Nurse and Physician Stakeholder Guidance on Improving Sexually Transmitted Infection Care in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Roland C Merchant, Daniela Ramirez-Castillo, Arlet Capeta Romero, Rachel Solnick, Patricia Mae Martinez, Christopher Strother, Melissa A Clark
{"title":"Nurse and Physician Stakeholder Guidance on Improving Sexually Transmitted Infection Care in a Pediatric Emergency Department.","authors":"Roland C Merchant, Daniela Ramirez-Castillo, Arlet Capeta Romero, Rachel Solnick, Patricia Mae Martinez, Christopher Strother, Melissa A Clark","doi":"10.5811/westjem.61866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) and general EDs in the United States (U.S.) do not consistently deliver sexually transmitted infection (STI) care that aligns with clinical guidelines. To inform the development of an implementation strategy plan aimed to improve STI care in a PED, we interviewed PED nurse and physician stakeholders to identify challenges and corresponding potential solutions aimed to improve STI care in a PED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 27 stakeholders consisting of emergency medicine (EM) residents, pediatrics residents, pediatric EM (PEM) fellows, attending pediatric emergency physicians, and PED nurses at an academic urban PED. Using the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases (TICD) framework, we prepared semi-structured interview guides specific to stakeholder roles structured according to the usual six successive workflow stages of STI care in the PED (triage, history-taking, physical examination, testing, treatment, and follow-up). Questions concerned current practices on providing STI care, challenges encountered, and potential solutions. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using rapid content analysis. Responses were coded independently by two reviewers and categorized by TICD determinant domain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants identified multilevel implementation challenges across the stages of STI care in the PED. Structural challenges included lack of privacy and limited private exam rooms, inadequate STI-related workflows, and inadequate waiting areas. Procedural challenges included the following: nonstandardized triage protocols; unclear role delineation; confusing sample collection procedures; insufficient training in STI examination, testing, and treatment procedures; variable documentation practices; and difficulty ensuring follow-up. Suggested solutions included development of role-specific STI protocols, smart phrases for documentation, improved sample-labeling procedures, prepackaged medications for empiric treatment, and embedded referral pathways to an adolescent care clinic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the TICD framework, this study identified key challenges, such as gaps in training, protocols and transition of care, and corresponding stakeholder-informed solutions to improve adolescent care for STIs in a pediatric ED setting. These findings can guide efforts to implement evidence-based STI practice guidelines in PEDs and general EDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"27 5","pages":"1305-1316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13660633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.61866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) and general EDs in the United States (U.S.) do not consistently deliver sexually transmitted infection (STI) care that aligns with clinical guidelines. To inform the development of an implementation strategy plan aimed to improve STI care in a PED, we interviewed PED nurse and physician stakeholders to identify challenges and corresponding potential solutions aimed to improve STI care in a PED.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 27 stakeholders consisting of emergency medicine (EM) residents, pediatrics residents, pediatric EM (PEM) fellows, attending pediatric emergency physicians, and PED nurses at an academic urban PED. Using the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases (TICD) framework, we prepared semi-structured interview guides specific to stakeholder roles structured according to the usual six successive workflow stages of STI care in the PED (triage, history-taking, physical examination, testing, treatment, and follow-up). Questions concerned current practices on providing STI care, challenges encountered, and potential solutions. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using rapid content analysis. Responses were coded independently by two reviewers and categorized by TICD determinant domain.

Results: Participants identified multilevel implementation challenges across the stages of STI care in the PED. Structural challenges included lack of privacy and limited private exam rooms, inadequate STI-related workflows, and inadequate waiting areas. Procedural challenges included the following: nonstandardized triage protocols; unclear role delineation; confusing sample collection procedures; insufficient training in STI examination, testing, and treatment procedures; variable documentation practices; and difficulty ensuring follow-up. Suggested solutions included development of role-specific STI protocols, smart phrases for documentation, improved sample-labeling procedures, prepackaged medications for empiric treatment, and embedded referral pathways to an adolescent care clinic.

Conclusion: Using the TICD framework, this study identified key challenges, such as gaps in training, protocols and transition of care, and corresponding stakeholder-informed solutions to improve adolescent care for STIs in a pediatric ED setting. These findings can guide efforts to implement evidence-based STI practice guidelines in PEDs and general EDs.

在儿科急诊科改善性传播感染护理的护士和医生利益相关者指导。
简介:美国儿科急诊科(PEDs)和普通急诊科(ed)的性传播感染(STI)治疗不符合临床指南。为了制定一项旨在改善PED中性传播感染护理的实施战略计划,我们采访了PED的护士和医生利益相关者,以确定旨在改善PED中性传播感染护理的挑战和相应的潜在解决方案。方法:我们对27名利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,包括急诊医学(EM)住院医师、儿科住院医师、儿科EM (PEM)研究员、儿科急诊主治医师和学术性城市PED的PED护士。使用慢性病定制实施(TICD)框架,我们根据PED中性传播感染护理通常的六个连续工作流程阶段(分诊、病史记录、体检、测试、治疗和随访)编制了针对利益相关者角色的半结构化访谈指南。问题涉及目前提供性传播感染护理的做法、遇到的挑战和可能的解决办法。采访记录和分析使用快速内容分析。回答由两位评论者独立编码,并按TICD行列式域分类。结果:参与者确定了PED中性病护理各个阶段的多层次实施挑战。结构性挑战包括缺乏隐私和有限的私人检查室、与sti相关的工作流程不足以及等候区不足。程序上的挑战包括:不标准化的分诊方案;角色划分不清;样品采集程序混乱;性传播感染检查、检测和治疗程序培训不足;可变文档实践;难以保证后续跟进。建议的解决方案包括制定特定角色的性传播感染协议、用于记录的智能短语、改进样本标签程序、用于经验性治疗的预包装药物,以及嵌入青少年护理诊所的转诊途径。结论:利用TICD框架,本研究确定了关键挑战,如培训、协议和护理过渡方面的差距,以及相应的利益相关者知情解决方案,以改善儿科急诊科环境中青少年性传播感染的护理。这些发现可以指导在儿科和普通急诊科实施循证性传播感染实践指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书