Long-term follow-up in asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic inguinal hernias: watchful or watchless waiting?

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
A C Valinoti, S Aramburu, J Principe, J A Giacone, E E Sadava
{"title":"Long-term follow-up in asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic inguinal hernias: watchful or watchless waiting?","authors":"A C Valinoti, S Aramburu, J Principe, J A Giacone, E E Sadava","doi":"10.1007/s00464-026-13475-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Watchful waiting (WW) for inguinal hernia has been established as a safe strategy for selected patients. However, this approach relies on regular long-term follow-up and adherence rates to WW are poorly characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients with inguinal hernia enrolled in a WW surveillance protocol between May 2013 and May 2026. Follow-up visits were scheduled every 6 months during the first year and annually thereafter. Demographic, clinical, and long-term adherence to surveillance protocols were analyzed Patients who were lost to follow-up were contacted via a structured questionnaire to update their clinical status and identify causes for discontinuing protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 400 patients were included in the WW protocol. Overall follow-up adherence was low, with 240 patients (60.0%) failing to maintain scheduled surveillance at the end of this study. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a progressive drop out of the protocol over time. Younger age was an independent factor associated with follow-up discontinuation. Patients younger than 30 years demonstrated the highest rate of surveillance discontinuation (92.9%), compared with 63.6% among patients aged 30-50 years and 56.4% among patients older than 50 years (p = 0.015). Seventy-seven (32%) responded to the survey; the most frequent causes for discontinuation were the absence of symptoms and the lack of awareness of recommended follow-up intervals (36% and 27%, respectively). Eleven patients (14.1%) had an elective hernia repair at another institution. No emergency surgery was identified among patients who remained under institutional follow-up or among those successfully contacted after surveillance discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Watchful waiting appears to remain an acceptable management strategy for selected patients with asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic inguinal hernia. However, long-term adherence to surveillance beyond 2 years is low, posing a significant limitation to sustained WW management.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13475-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Watchful waiting (WW) for inguinal hernia has been established as a safe strategy for selected patients. However, this approach relies on regular long-term follow-up and adherence rates to WW are poorly characterized.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients with inguinal hernia enrolled in a WW surveillance protocol between May 2013 and May 2026. Follow-up visits were scheduled every 6 months during the first year and annually thereafter. Demographic, clinical, and long-term adherence to surveillance protocols were analyzed Patients who were lost to follow-up were contacted via a structured questionnaire to update their clinical status and identify causes for discontinuing protocol.

Results: A total of 400 patients were included in the WW protocol. Overall follow-up adherence was low, with 240 patients (60.0%) failing to maintain scheduled surveillance at the end of this study. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a progressive drop out of the protocol over time. Younger age was an independent factor associated with follow-up discontinuation. Patients younger than 30 years demonstrated the highest rate of surveillance discontinuation (92.9%), compared with 63.6% among patients aged 30-50 years and 56.4% among patients older than 50 years (p = 0.015). Seventy-seven (32%) responded to the survey; the most frequent causes for discontinuation were the absence of symptoms and the lack of awareness of recommended follow-up intervals (36% and 27%, respectively). Eleven patients (14.1%) had an elective hernia repair at another institution. No emergency surgery was identified among patients who remained under institutional follow-up or among those successfully contacted after surveillance discontinuation.

Conclusions: Watchful waiting appears to remain an acceptable management strategy for selected patients with asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic inguinal hernia. However, long-term adherence to surveillance beyond 2 years is low, posing a significant limitation to sustained WW management.

无症状或少症状腹股沟疝的长期随访:观察还是不观察等待?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书