A Web-Based Registry Framework Linking Transfusion Practice to Long-Term Patient Outcomes: Design and Single-Center Feasibility Study.

IF 8.8 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elina Nürenberg-Goloub, Benjamin Friedrichson, Michael Nordine, Holger Storf, Kai Zacharowski, Jan Andreas Kloka
{"title":"A Web-Based Registry Framework Linking Transfusion Practice to Long-Term Patient Outcomes: Design and Single-Center Feasibility Study.","authors":"Elina Nürenberg-Goloub, Benjamin Friedrichson, Michael Nordine, Holger Storf, Kai Zacharowski, Jan Andreas Kloka","doi":"10.1007/s10916-026-02474-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood transfusions are among the most common medical interventions performed worldwide. Several comprehensive databases link transfusions to routinely collected health data but do not include the indication and the decision-making basis for a particular administration, nor patient-reported long-term outcomes. We developed a web-based registry for the standardized assessment of transfusion practice and patient outcomes, designed for an observation period of up to 30 years. The framework combines clinical data captured at the point of care with patient-reported outcome measures collected through automated digital follow-up, ensures privacy by design through physical separation of identifying and medical data, and codes diagnoses and procedures in SNOMED CT. We evaluated feasibility in a single-center pilot at Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt (11 September 2024-15 January 2026), with patient-reported follow-up collected through 13 August 2026. A total of 408 patients were enrolled, yielding 1,298 administrations across nine treatment categories in a predominantly cardiac surgical cohort. The pilot demonstrated that the registry integrates into routine clinical workflows, captures the parameters required for guideline-adherence monitoring, and supports sex-disaggregated, descriptive analyses of transfusion practice. Follow-up was completed by 12.5% of patients at 3 months and 15.2% of patients at 1 year; paired baseline-follow-up assessments of physical capacity and frailty demonstrate the data structure for capturing functional recovery. Risk-adjusted benchmarking, network-wide analyses, and donor outcomes are designed capabilities of the framework that were not evaluated in this pilot. The platform is available in 16 languages and participation is open to further institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13683471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-026-02474-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blood transfusions are among the most common medical interventions performed worldwide. Several comprehensive databases link transfusions to routinely collected health data but do not include the indication and the decision-making basis for a particular administration, nor patient-reported long-term outcomes. We developed a web-based registry for the standardized assessment of transfusion practice and patient outcomes, designed for an observation period of up to 30 years. The framework combines clinical data captured at the point of care with patient-reported outcome measures collected through automated digital follow-up, ensures privacy by design through physical separation of identifying and medical data, and codes diagnoses and procedures in SNOMED CT. We evaluated feasibility in a single-center pilot at Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt (11 September 2024-15 January 2026), with patient-reported follow-up collected through 13 August 2026. A total of 408 patients were enrolled, yielding 1,298 administrations across nine treatment categories in a predominantly cardiac surgical cohort. The pilot demonstrated that the registry integrates into routine clinical workflows, captures the parameters required for guideline-adherence monitoring, and supports sex-disaggregated, descriptive analyses of transfusion practice. Follow-up was completed by 12.5% of patients at 3 months and 15.2% of patients at 1 year; paired baseline-follow-up assessments of physical capacity and frailty demonstrate the data structure for capturing functional recovery. Risk-adjusted benchmarking, network-wide analyses, and donor outcomes are designed capabilities of the framework that were not evaluated in this pilot. The platform is available in 16 languages and participation is open to further institutions.

将输血实践与长期患者预后联系起来的基于网络的注册框架:设计和单中心可行性研究。
输血是世界上最常见的医疗干预措施之一。几个综合数据库将输血与常规收集的健康数据联系起来,但不包括特定给药的适应症和决策基础,也不包括患者报告的长期结果。我们开发了一个基于网络的注册表,用于标准化评估输血实践和患者结果,设计为长达30年的观察期。该框架将在护理点捕获的临床数据与通过自动数字随访收集的患者报告结果测量相结合,通过物理分离识别数据和医疗数据,通过设计确保隐私,并对SNOMED CT的诊断和程序进行编码。我们在法兰克福歌德大学医院的单中心试点(2024年9月11日- 2026年1月15日)评估了可行性,并收集了患者报告的随访至2026年8月13日。在以心脏外科为主的队列中,共有408名患者入组,在9个治疗类别中进行了1298次给药。该试点项目表明,该登记系统整合到常规临床工作流程中,捕捉了监测指南遵守情况所需的参数,并支持按性别分列的输血实践描述性分析。随访3个月时12.5%的患者完成,1年时15.2%的患者完成;对身体能力和虚弱的基线-随访评估展示了捕捉功能恢复的数据结构。风险调整基准、全网络分析和捐助者成果是该框架的设计能力,在本试点中未进行评估。该平台有16种语言版本,并向更多机构开放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Systems
Journal of Medical Systems 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书