Skin Toxic Effects and Survival With Enfortumab Vedotin-Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Zachariah Thomas, Cindy Y Jiang, Patrick J Speck, Emanuele Crupi, Mohammad Jad Moussa, Adrienne Joseph, Carly Stender, Michael Glover, Andrew C Johns, Jianjun Gao, Monica Desai, Amishi Y Shah, Sangeeta Goswami, Arlene Siefker-Radtke, Anishia-Rawther Karedath, Sheeba P Varughese, Wenhong Ren, Comron Hassanzadeh, Kelly K Bree, Ashish M Kamat, Charles C Guo, Omar Pacha, Anisha Patel, Jonathan Curry, Alex D Sherry, Pavlos Msaouel, Matthew T Campbell, Omar Alhalabi
{"title":"Skin Toxic Effects and Survival With Enfortumab Vedotin-Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.","authors":"Zachariah Thomas, Cindy Y Jiang, Patrick J Speck, Emanuele Crupi, Mohammad Jad Moussa, Adrienne Joseph, Carly Stender, Michael Glover, Andrew C Johns, Jianjun Gao, Monica Desai, Amishi Y Shah, Sangeeta Goswami, Arlene Siefker-Radtke, Anishia-Rawther Karedath, Sheeba P Varughese, Wenhong Ren, Comron Hassanzadeh, Kelly K Bree, Ashish M Kamat, Charles C Guo, Omar Pacha, Anisha Patel, Jonathan Curry, Alex D Sherry, Pavlos Msaouel, Matthew T Campbell, Omar Alhalabi","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.39517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Skin toxic effects are a common early adverse event of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) therapy, but its association with clinical outcomes in patients receiving first-line therapy remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between treatment-emergent skin toxic effects and clinical outcomes among patients receiving first-line EVP.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was performed at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center among adults with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving first-line EVP therapy between March 3, 2022, and July 31, 2025. Skin toxic effects were used as a time-dependent exposure in Cox proportional hazards regression to account for immortal-time bias. Prespecified sequential adjustment models and 30-day landmark analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Treatment-emergent skin toxic effects (rash or pruritus) were identified from medical records.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and objective response rate (ORR). OS and PFS were measured from EVP therapy initiation to the respective event or last follow-up. ORR was evaluated among patients with a response assessment after the 30-day landmark, according to skin toxic effects status within the first 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 185 patients (median age, 73 [IQR, 67-79] years; 140 [75.7%] male), skin toxic effects occurred in 98 (53.0%) at a median of 14 (IQR, 7-28) days after EVP therapy initiation. Skin toxic effects of grade 3 or higher occurred in 10 patients (5.4%). Skin toxic effects resulted in EV dose reduction in 31 patients (16.8%), treatment interruption in 20 (10.8%), and treatment discontinuation in 9 (4.9%). At a median follow-up of 17.7 (IQR, 11.3-24.2) months, Simon-Makuch curves demonstrated longer OS and PFS among all patients and longer OS among patients with visceral metastases in the skin toxic effects stratum than in the no toxicity stratum. In adjusted time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression, skin toxic effects were associated with longer OS (hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.20-0.57]). The association remained consistent across sequential adjustment models and prespecified 30-day landmark analyses. In the 30-day landmark analyses, associations with PFS and ORR remained directionally favorable but were attenuated after multivariable adjustment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of 185 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving first-line EVP therapy, treatment-emergent skin toxic effects were associated with longer OS. These findings support further prospective validation of skin toxic effects as an early clinical marker of treatment benefit and investigation of the biological mechanisms underlying this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 10","pages":"e2639517"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13684480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.39517","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Skin toxic effects are a common early adverse event of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) therapy, but its association with clinical outcomes in patients receiving first-line therapy remains uncertain.

Objective: To evaluate the association between treatment-emergent skin toxic effects and clinical outcomes among patients receiving first-line EVP.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study was performed at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center among adults with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving first-line EVP therapy between March 3, 2022, and July 31, 2025. Skin toxic effects were used as a time-dependent exposure in Cox proportional hazards regression to account for immortal-time bias. Prespecified sequential adjustment models and 30-day landmark analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings.

Exposure: Treatment-emergent skin toxic effects (rash or pruritus) were identified from medical records.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and objective response rate (ORR). OS and PFS were measured from EVP therapy initiation to the respective event or last follow-up. ORR was evaluated among patients with a response assessment after the 30-day landmark, according to skin toxic effects status within the first 30 days.

Results: Among 185 patients (median age, 73 [IQR, 67-79] years; 140 [75.7%] male), skin toxic effects occurred in 98 (53.0%) at a median of 14 (IQR, 7-28) days after EVP therapy initiation. Skin toxic effects of grade 3 or higher occurred in 10 patients (5.4%). Skin toxic effects resulted in EV dose reduction in 31 patients (16.8%), treatment interruption in 20 (10.8%), and treatment discontinuation in 9 (4.9%). At a median follow-up of 17.7 (IQR, 11.3-24.2) months, Simon-Makuch curves demonstrated longer OS and PFS among all patients and longer OS among patients with visceral metastases in the skin toxic effects stratum than in the no toxicity stratum. In adjusted time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression, skin toxic effects were associated with longer OS (hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.20-0.57]). The association remained consistent across sequential adjustment models and prespecified 30-day landmark analyses. In the 30-day landmark analyses, associations with PFS and ORR remained directionally favorable but were attenuated after multivariable adjustment.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of 185 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving first-line EVP therapy, treatment-emergent skin toxic effects were associated with longer OS. These findings support further prospective validation of skin toxic effects as an early clinical marker of treatment benefit and investigation of the biological mechanisms underlying this association.

在晚期尿路上皮癌中,使用维多汀-派姆单抗的皮肤毒性作用和生存期。
重要性:皮肤毒性作用是使用EVP治疗时常见的早期不良事件,但在接受一线治疗的患者中,其与临床结果的关系仍不确定。目的:评价一线EVP患者治疗后出现的皮肤毒性反应与临床结果的关系。设计、环境和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究在德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心进行,在2022年3月3日至2025年7月31日期间接受一线EVP治疗的局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌成人患者中进行。在Cox比例风险回归中,皮肤毒性效应被用作时间依赖性暴露,以解释不朽的时间偏差。采用预先设定的顺序调整模型和30天里程碑分析来评估研究结果的稳健性。暴露:从医疗记录中确定治疗后出现的皮肤毒性作用(皮疹或瘙痒)。主要结局和指标:主要结局为总生存期(OS)。次要结局包括无进展生存期和客观缓解率(ORR)。从EVP治疗开始到各自事件或最后一次随访,测量OS和PFS。根据前30天内的皮肤毒性作用状态,在30天里程碑后进行反应评估的患者中评估ORR。结果:185例患者(中位年龄73 [IQR, 67-79]岁;140[75.7%]男性)中,98例(53.0%)患者在EVP治疗开始后14 (IQR, 7-28)天出现皮肤毒性反应。10例患者(5.4%)出现3级或以上的皮肤毒性作用。皮肤毒性作用导致31例(16.8%)患者EV剂量减少,20例(10.8%)患者治疗中断,9例(4.9%)患者停止治疗。在17.7 (IQR, 11.3-24.2)个月的中位随访中,Simon-Makuch曲线显示,所有患者的OS和PFS都比无毒性层的患者更长,皮肤毒性层的内脏转移患者的OS更长。在调整后的Cox时间相关比例风险回归中,皮肤毒性效应与较长的生存期相关(风险比为0.34 [95% CI, 0.20-0.57])。该关联在顺序调整模型和预先指定的30天里程碑分析中保持一致。在30天的里程碑分析中,PFS和ORR的相关性在方向上仍然有利,但在多变量调整后减弱。结论和相关性:在这项185例局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者接受一线EVP治疗的队列研究中,治疗后出现的皮肤毒性效应与较长的生存期相关。这些发现支持进一步前瞻性验证皮肤毒性效应作为治疗获益的早期临床标志,并研究这种关联背后的生物学机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书