Words That Heal: A Systematic Review of Healthcare Providers-Patient Communication to Enhance Chronic Care Management and Practice Recommendations.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Giada Pietrabissa, Giada Rapelli, Gloria Marchesi, Gianluca Castelnuovo
{"title":"Words That Heal: A Systematic Review of Healthcare Providers-Patient Communication to Enhance Chronic Care Management and Practice Recommendations.","authors":"Giada Pietrabissa, Giada Rapelli, Gloria Marchesi, Gianluca Castelnuovo","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2026.2749455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic diseases represent a major global health burden, and suboptimal treatment adherence remains a key obstacle to long-term management. Healthcare provider (HCP)-patient communication is a modifiable determinant of adherence and psychological functioning, yet evidence remains fragmented across conditions and communication domains. This review builds on patient-centered communication scholarship and established models of communication functions and pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on HCP-patient communication strategies associated with treatment adherence and psychological outcomes among adults with chronic diseases, including diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular, and respiratory conditions. Following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration (CRD42020171690), five databases (Scopus, PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar) were searched. <i>Results</i>: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Communication strategies clustered into four macro-domains: (1) trust and interpersonal relationship; (2) information exchange and decision processes; (3) active involvement, empowerment, and autonomy; and (4) change processes, emotional regulation, and management of difficulties. Domains were defined a priori from patient-centered communication, self-management, and behavior-change literature and refined during data extraction. Across conditions, integrated communication patterns addressing multiple domains were generally associated with favorable adherence, self-management, clinical, quality-of-life, and healthcare-utilization outcomes, although evidence strength varied by study design, disease context, and methodological quality. Findings support a provisional, evidence-informed framework in which HCP-patient communication strategies, organized within relational, informational, participatory, and change-regulatory macro-domains, may engage proximal regulatory processes that, in turn, may be associated with adherence and other chronic-care outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to test these pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2026.2749455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic diseases represent a major global health burden, and suboptimal treatment adherence remains a key obstacle to long-term management. Healthcare provider (HCP)-patient communication is a modifiable determinant of adherence and psychological functioning, yet evidence remains fragmented across conditions and communication domains. This review builds on patient-centered communication scholarship and established models of communication functions and pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on HCP-patient communication strategies associated with treatment adherence and psychological outcomes among adults with chronic diseases, including diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular, and respiratory conditions. Following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration (CRD42020171690), five databases (Scopus, PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar) were searched. Results: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Communication strategies clustered into four macro-domains: (1) trust and interpersonal relationship; (2) information exchange and decision processes; (3) active involvement, empowerment, and autonomy; and (4) change processes, emotional regulation, and management of difficulties. Domains were defined a priori from patient-centered communication, self-management, and behavior-change literature and refined during data extraction. Across conditions, integrated communication patterns addressing multiple domains were generally associated with favorable adherence, self-management, clinical, quality-of-life, and healthcare-utilization outcomes, although evidence strength varied by study design, disease context, and methodological quality. Findings support a provisional, evidence-informed framework in which HCP-patient communication strategies, organized within relational, informational, participatory, and change-regulatory macro-domains, may engage proximal regulatory processes that, in turn, may be associated with adherence and other chronic-care outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to test these pathways.

治愈的话语:医疗保健提供者-患者沟通的系统回顾,以加强慢性护理管理和实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书