Screening for asthma among women referred for fertility treatment using a symptom questionnaire and fractional exhaled nitric oxide.

IF 1.6 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2026-10-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2026.2728866
Oscar Nyholm Miller, Anne Vejen Hansen, Casper Tidemandsen, Emilia Yifei Huang, Nina la Cour Freiesleben, Vibeke Backer, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik
{"title":"Screening for asthma among women referred for fertility treatment using a symptom questionnaire and fractional exhaled nitric oxide.","authors":"Oscar Nyholm Miller, Anne Vejen Hansen, Casper Tidemandsen, Emilia Yifei Huang, Nina la Cour Freiesleben, Vibeke Backer, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2026.2728866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Asthma, a highly prevalent disorder among women of reproductive age, is associated with infertility and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Well-controlled asthma likely improves fertility and pregnancy outcomes, yet asthma is underdiagnosed. Therefore, we evaluated the value of the 'Life Quality Test (LQT)' from the American College of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) as a screening tool for current asthma among women referred for fertility treatment, as they may benefit from further assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was set up within the PRO-ART study. Women referred for fertility treatment at four Danish hospitals completed the LQT-survey. Those with affirmative responses were invited for a screening visit with spirometry, bronchial provocation, and FeNO measurement. Asthma diagnosis was based on bronchial provocation. Associations between asthma, FeNO, and LQT-scores were assessed using logistic regression. A grid-search algorithm identified thresholds for an effective screening tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 188 women screened, 119 (63.3%) had asthma, of whom 47 (39.4%) had no previous asthma diagnosis. FeNO alone was weakly predictive (OR 1.04, <i>p</i> = 0.036), while LQT-scores were stronger predictors for asthma (OR 1.40, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Combined, FeNO and LQT-scores revealed good predictive value (AUC = 0.82). A screening algorithm with combined criteria of LQT ≥ 7, FeNO ≥ 25 ppb, or 5 ≤ LQT < 7 with FeNO 12-25 ppb achieved 87.9% sensitivity and 55.4% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Undiagnosed asthma is common among women referred for fertility treatment. Combining FeNO and LQT-score provides a feasible, non-invasive screening method for probable asthma, warranting validation in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"2728866"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13678875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2026.2728866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Asthma, a highly prevalent disorder among women of reproductive age, is associated with infertility and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Well-controlled asthma likely improves fertility and pregnancy outcomes, yet asthma is underdiagnosed. Therefore, we evaluated the value of the 'Life Quality Test (LQT)' from the American College of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) as a screening tool for current asthma among women referred for fertility treatment, as they may benefit from further assessment.

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was set up within the PRO-ART study. Women referred for fertility treatment at four Danish hospitals completed the LQT-survey. Those with affirmative responses were invited for a screening visit with spirometry, bronchial provocation, and FeNO measurement. Asthma diagnosis was based on bronchial provocation. Associations between asthma, FeNO, and LQT-scores were assessed using logistic regression. A grid-search algorithm identified thresholds for an effective screening tool.

Results: Of 188 women screened, 119 (63.3%) had asthma, of whom 47 (39.4%) had no previous asthma diagnosis. FeNO alone was weakly predictive (OR 1.04, p = 0.036), while LQT-scores were stronger predictors for asthma (OR 1.40, p < 0.001). Combined, FeNO and LQT-scores revealed good predictive value (AUC = 0.82). A screening algorithm with combined criteria of LQT ≥ 7, FeNO ≥ 25 ppb, or 5 ≤ LQT < 7 with FeNO 12-25 ppb achieved 87.9% sensitivity and 55.4% specificity.

Conclusion: Undiagnosed asthma is common among women referred for fertility treatment. Combining FeNO and LQT-score provides a feasible, non-invasive screening method for probable asthma, warranting validation in larger cohorts.

在接受生育治疗的妇女中使用症状问卷和分数呼出一氧化氮筛查哮喘。
简介:哮喘是育龄妇女中非常普遍的疾病,与不孕症和不良妊娠结局有关。控制良好的哮喘可能会提高生育能力和妊娠结局,但哮喘未得到充分诊断。因此,我们评估了美国哮喘,过敏和免疫学院的“生活质量测试(LQT)”和分数呼气一氧化氮(FeNO)作为生育治疗妇女当前哮喘筛查工具的价值,因为她们可能从进一步评估中受益。方法:在PRO-ART研究中建立横断面观察性研究。转介到丹麦四家医院接受生育治疗的妇女完成了lqt调查。那些有肯定反应的人被邀请进行肺活量测定、支气管刺激和FeNO测量的筛查访问。哮喘诊断基于支气管刺激。使用逻辑回归评估哮喘、FeNO和lqt评分之间的相关性。网格搜索算法确定了有效筛选工具的阈值。结果:188名筛查女性中,119名(63.3%)患有哮喘,其中47名(39.4%)既往无哮喘诊断。单独FeNO对哮喘的预测较弱(OR 1.04, p = 0.036),而lqt评分对哮喘的预测较强(OR 1.40, p)。结论:未确诊的哮喘在接受生育治疗的妇女中很常见。结合FeNO和lqt评分为可能的哮喘提供了一种可行的、非侵入性的筛查方法,需要在更大的队列中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书