Racial Disparities in Severe Maternal Morbidity: The Role of Maternal Comorbidities.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Health economics Pub Date : 2026-10-20 DOI:10.1002/hec.70158
Annamaria Milazzo
{"title":"Racial Disparities in Severe Maternal Morbidity: The Role of Maternal Comorbidities.","authors":"Annamaria Milazzo","doi":"10.1002/hec.70158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The U.S. maternal health crisis disproportionately affects Black women, who face nearly twice the risk of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) compared with White women. Using 2016-2022 Texas hospital discharge data and a validated obstetric comorbidity score, the analysis first documents that the prevalence of SMM increased by 18% between 2016 and 2022, whereas maternal comorbidity burden increased by 42% over the same period. To better assess the role of comorbidities, the comorbidity score is disaggregated into underlying health and pregnancy-specific conditions. Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions indicate that the former accounts for the largest share-49 to 53%-of the Black-White SMM gap, while the latter accounts for an additional third of the disparity. After accounting for these factors, a residual Black-White SMM gap of 17%-20% persists across and within hospitals, including among women treated by the same physician. Overall, the findings underscore the critical need to improve women's health well before childbirth hospitalization and throughout the reproductive life course, while also strengthening prenatal care to prevent and effectively manage conditions that arise during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. maternal health crisis disproportionately affects Black women, who face nearly twice the risk of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) compared with White women. Using 2016-2022 Texas hospital discharge data and a validated obstetric comorbidity score, the analysis first documents that the prevalence of SMM increased by 18% between 2016 and 2022, whereas maternal comorbidity burden increased by 42% over the same period. To better assess the role of comorbidities, the comorbidity score is disaggregated into underlying health and pregnancy-specific conditions. Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions indicate that the former accounts for the largest share-49 to 53%-of the Black-White SMM gap, while the latter accounts for an additional third of the disparity. After accounting for these factors, a residual Black-White SMM gap of 17%-20% persists across and within hospitals, including among women treated by the same physician. Overall, the findings underscore the critical need to improve women's health well before childbirth hospitalization and throughout the reproductive life course, while also strengthening prenatal care to prevent and effectively manage conditions that arise during pregnancy.

严重产妇发病率的种族差异:产妇合并症的作用。
美国孕产妇健康危机对黑人妇女的影响尤为严重,她们面临的严重孕产妇发病率(SMM)风险几乎是白人妇女的两倍。利用2016-2022年德克萨斯州医院出院数据和有效的产科合并症评分,该分析首次证明,2016年至2022年期间,SMM的患病率增加了18%,而同期孕产妇合并症负担增加了42%。为了更好地评估合并症的作用,合并症评分被分解为潜在的健康和妊娠特异性条件。瓦哈卡-布林德的分解表明,前者占黑人-白人平均收入差距的最大份额——49%至53%,而后者又占了三分之一的差距。在考虑了这些因素后,在医院之间和医院内部,包括在同一医生治疗的妇女之间,仍然存在17%-20%的残余黑人-白人SMM差距。总的来说,调查结果强调,迫切需要在分娩前、住院治疗和整个生殖生命过程中改善妇女的健康,同时加强产前护理,以预防和有效管理怀孕期间出现的疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health economics
Health economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems. Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses. Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书