Community-based traditional Chinese medicine health service use among older adults and provider-reported delivery barriers in Wuhan, China: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yake Yue, Jiaying Fu, Juan Gu, Mengjie Tong, Yufei Qiu, Jiali Liu, Jianxiong Du, Fen Yang
{"title":"Community-based traditional Chinese medicine health service use among older adults and provider-reported delivery barriers in Wuhan, China: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study.","authors":"Yake Yue, Jiaying Fu, Juan Gu, Mengjie Tong, Yufei Qiu, Jiali Liu, Jianxiong Du, Fen Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12913-026-15625-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Population ageing and multimorbidity are increasing the need for accessible community-based care, while service use may vary according to service availability, affordability, and delivery capacity. In China, community-based traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) health services represent one model of primary care support for prevention and chronic disease management, but evidence rarely integrates older adults' service use with frontline providers' delivery experiences within the same setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used in Wuhan, China, from December 2024 to July 2025. The quantitative phase involved a structured survey of 1,195 adults aged ≥ 60 years who were recruited on site at selected community health service centres. The qualitative phase included in-depth interviews with 11 primary care providers. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's χ² tests or Fisher's exact test, and multivariable binary logistic regression. Two multivariable binary logistic regression models were fitted: a primary model excluding awareness of services and an exploratory model including it. Firth's penalised likelihood was used as a sensitivity analysis for the small uninsured subgroup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,195 older adults recruited during designated survey sessions at seven selected community health service centres, 729 (61.0%) reported receiving at least one community-based TCM health service during the past 12 months. In bivariate analyses, the proportion reporting use during the past 12 months differed significantly by sex, education level, medical insurance status, monthly household income, smoking status, drinking status, number of chronic conditions, awareness of community-based TCM health services, perceived convenience of access, and perceived complexity of the service process (all P < 0.05). In the primary multivariable model excluding awareness, higher educational attainment, higher monthly household income, and a greater number of chronic conditions were associated with higher odds of reported use. Participants without medical insurance had lower odds of reported use than those covered by urban employee basic medical insurance (aOR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.77). The Firth penalised logistic regression sensitivity analysis yielded a directionally consistent estimate for the small uninsured subgroup. Thematic analysis of interviews with primary care providers identified three themes of provider-reported or provider-perceived contextual barriers to service delivery: perceived limitations in policy and support systems, workforce and material resources, and barriers related to community awareness and acceptance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among older adults recruited on site at selected community health service centres, reported use of community-based TCM health services during the past 12 months was associated with educational attainment, monthly household income, number of chronic conditions, and medical insurance status. Interviewed primary care providers reported service-delivery challenges related to policy and support systems, workforce and material resources, and their perceptions of community awareness and acceptance. These findings describe individual-level associations within the study sample and provider-reported service-delivery challenges, and may inform further research and local service planning.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13682153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15625-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Population ageing and multimorbidity are increasing the need for accessible community-based care, while service use may vary according to service availability, affordability, and delivery capacity. In China, community-based traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) health services represent one model of primary care support for prevention and chronic disease management, but evidence rarely integrates older adults' service use with frontline providers' delivery experiences within the same setting.

Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used in Wuhan, China, from December 2024 to July 2025. The quantitative phase involved a structured survey of 1,195 adults aged ≥ 60 years who were recruited on site at selected community health service centres. The qualitative phase included in-depth interviews with 11 primary care providers. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's χ² tests or Fisher's exact test, and multivariable binary logistic regression. Two multivariable binary logistic regression models were fitted: a primary model excluding awareness of services and an exploratory model including it. Firth's penalised likelihood was used as a sensitivity analysis for the small uninsured subgroup.

Results: Among the 1,195 older adults recruited during designated survey sessions at seven selected community health service centres, 729 (61.0%) reported receiving at least one community-based TCM health service during the past 12 months. In bivariate analyses, the proportion reporting use during the past 12 months differed significantly by sex, education level, medical insurance status, monthly household income, smoking status, drinking status, number of chronic conditions, awareness of community-based TCM health services, perceived convenience of access, and perceived complexity of the service process (all P < 0.05). In the primary multivariable model excluding awareness, higher educational attainment, higher monthly household income, and a greater number of chronic conditions were associated with higher odds of reported use. Participants without medical insurance had lower odds of reported use than those covered by urban employee basic medical insurance (aOR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.77). The Firth penalised logistic regression sensitivity analysis yielded a directionally consistent estimate for the small uninsured subgroup. Thematic analysis of interviews with primary care providers identified three themes of provider-reported or provider-perceived contextual barriers to service delivery: perceived limitations in policy and support systems, workforce and material resources, and barriers related to community awareness and acceptance.

Conclusions: Among older adults recruited on site at selected community health service centres, reported use of community-based TCM health services during the past 12 months was associated with educational attainment, monthly household income, number of chronic conditions, and medical insurance status. Interviewed primary care providers reported service-delivery challenges related to policy and support systems, workforce and material resources, and their perceptions of community awareness and acceptance. These findings describe individual-level associations within the study sample and provider-reported service-delivery challenges, and may inform further research and local service planning.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

中国武汉老年人社区中医药卫生服务使用和提供者报告的交付障碍:一项解释性顺序混合方法研究
背景:人口老龄化和多种疾病增加了对无障碍社区护理的需求,而服务的使用可能因服务的可得性、可负担性和提供能力而异。在中国,以社区为基础的中医卫生服务代表了初级保健支持预防和慢性病管理的一种模式,但在同一环境下,很少有证据将老年人的服务使用与一线提供者的服务经验结合起来。方法:采用解释顺序混合方法设计,于2024年12月至2025年7月在中国武汉进行。定量阶段包括对在选定的社区卫生服务中心现场招募的1,195名年龄≥60岁的成年人进行结构化调查。定性阶段包括对11名初级保健提供者进行深入访谈。定量资料采用描述性统计、Pearson χ 2检验或Fisher精确检验和多变量二元逻辑回归进行分析。拟合了两个多变量二元逻辑回归模型:一个不包括服务意识的初级模型和一个包括服务意识的探索性模型。Firth的惩罚可能性被用作小型未投保亚组的敏感性分析。结果:在选定的7个社区卫生服务中心的指定调查时段招募的1195名老年人中,729人(61.0%)报告在过去12个月内至少接受过一次社区中医卫生服务。在双变量分析中,过去12个月报告使用中医药的比例在性别、受教育程度、医疗保险状况、家庭月收入、吸烟状况、饮酒状况、慢性病数量、对社区中医药卫生服务的认识、感知到的获取便利性和感知到的服务过程的复杂性方面存在显著差异(均P)。在选定的社区卫生服务中心现场招募的老年人中,报告在过去12个月内使用社区中医卫生服务与受教育程度、家庭月收入、慢性病数量和医疗保险状况有关。受访的初级保健提供者报告了与政策和支持系统、劳动力和物质资源以及他们对社区意识和接受程度的看法有关的服务提供挑战。这些发现描述了研究样本和供应商报告的服务交付挑战中的个人层面的关联,并可能为进一步的研究和地方服务规划提供信息。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书