Integrated computational and biochemical identification of quinoline-8-arylsulfonamides as disruptors of the Skp2–Cks1 protein–protein interaction

IF 2.9 4区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Emadeldin M. Kamel, Ahmed A. Allam, Hassan A. Rudayni, Sarah I. Othman, Fahad M. Alshabrmi, Faris F. Aba Alkhayl, Al Mokhtar Lamsabhi
{"title":"Integrated computational and biochemical identification of quinoline-8-arylsulfonamides as disruptors of the Skp2–Cks1 protein–protein interaction","authors":"Emadeldin M. Kamel,&nbsp;Ahmed A. Allam,&nbsp;Hassan A. Rudayni,&nbsp;Sarah I. Othman,&nbsp;Fahad M. Alshabrmi,&nbsp;Faris F. Aba Alkhayl,&nbsp;Al Mokhtar Lamsabhi","doi":"10.1007/s00894-026-06978-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>The Skp2–Cks1 protein–protein interaction is essential for the recognition and ubiquitination of cell-cycle regulators such as p27 and represents an attractive target for anticancer drug discovery. This study aimed to identify small-molecule disruptors of the Skp2–Cks1 interface from a quinoline-8-arylsulfonamide library using an integrated computational and experimental approach. Comparative MM/PBSA analysis indicated that C2 and C1 produced the greatest predicted weakening of the interface, with ΔΔGₚₚᵢ values of +13.19 and +9.54 kcal/mol, respectively. Conversely, C3 and C4 yielded negative values of −15.21 and −26.47 kcal/mol, consistent with predicted interface stabilization. These computational findings were supported by the biochemical activity ranking: C2 and C1 exhibited the lowest IC₅₀ values, at 1.48 ± 0.13 and 1.87 ± 0.13 µM, respectively, compared with 2.62 ± 0.35 µM for the reference compound NSC689857. C3 and C4 showed substantially weaker activity. These findings identify quinoline-8-arylsulfonamides as a promising chemotype for targeting the Skp2–Cks1 interface and prioritize C2 for further optimization.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A funnel-based virtual screening strategy was applied to 74 compounds, incorporating diversity and drug-likeness filtering, molecular docking with AutoDock Vina, short molecular dynamics refinement, and MM/PBSA rescoring. Prioritized complexes underwent 1000 ns molecular dynamics simulations, free-energy landscape analysis, quantitative assessment of protein–protein interaction disruption metrics, and in silico ADMET profiling. Comparative MM/PBSA calculations evaluated ligand-induced changes in Skp2–Cks1 interaction energy relative to the apo complex. Biochemical inhibitory activity was assessed using an in vitro homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) assay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","volume":"32 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00894-026-06978-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

The Skp2–Cks1 protein–protein interaction is essential for the recognition and ubiquitination of cell-cycle regulators such as p27 and represents an attractive target for anticancer drug discovery. This study aimed to identify small-molecule disruptors of the Skp2–Cks1 interface from a quinoline-8-arylsulfonamide library using an integrated computational and experimental approach. Comparative MM/PBSA analysis indicated that C2 and C1 produced the greatest predicted weakening of the interface, with ΔΔGₚₚᵢ values of +13.19 and +9.54 kcal/mol, respectively. Conversely, C3 and C4 yielded negative values of −15.21 and −26.47 kcal/mol, consistent with predicted interface stabilization. These computational findings were supported by the biochemical activity ranking: C2 and C1 exhibited the lowest IC₅₀ values, at 1.48 ± 0.13 and 1.87 ± 0.13 µM, respectively, compared with 2.62 ± 0.35 µM for the reference compound NSC689857. C3 and C4 showed substantially weaker activity. These findings identify quinoline-8-arylsulfonamides as a promising chemotype for targeting the Skp2–Cks1 interface and prioritize C2 for further optimization.

Methods

A funnel-based virtual screening strategy was applied to 74 compounds, incorporating diversity and drug-likeness filtering, molecular docking with AutoDock Vina, short molecular dynamics refinement, and MM/PBSA rescoring. Prioritized complexes underwent 1000 ns molecular dynamics simulations, free-energy landscape analysis, quantitative assessment of protein–protein interaction disruption metrics, and in silico ADMET profiling. Comparative MM/PBSA calculations evaluated ligand-induced changes in Skp2–Cks1 interaction energy relative to the apo complex. Biochemical inhibitory activity was assessed using an in vitro homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) assay.

作为Skp2-Cks1蛋白-蛋白相互作用干扰物的喹啉-8-芳基磺酰胺的综合计算和生化鉴定。
背景:Skp2-Cks1蛋白-蛋白相互作用对于细胞周期调节因子(如p27)的识别和泛素化至关重要,并且代表了抗癌药物发现的一个有吸引力的靶点。本研究旨在利用综合计算和实验方法从喹啉-8-芳基磺酰胺文库中鉴定Skp2-Cks1界面的小分子干扰物。对比MM/PBSA分析表明,C2和C1对界面的预测减弱作用最大,其ΔΔGₚₚ′′值分别为+13.19和+9.54 kcal/mol。相反,C3和C4产生负的-15.21和-26.47 kcal/mol,与预测的界面稳定一致。这些计算结果得到了生化活性排名的支持:C2和C1的IC₅0值最低,分别为1.48±0.13和1.87±0.13µM,而参考化合物NSC689857的IC₅0值为2.62±0.35µM。C3和C4的活性明显较弱。这些发现确定了喹啉-8-芳基磺酰胺作为靶向Skp2-Cks1界面的有前途的化学型,并优先考虑C2进行进一步优化。方法:采用基于通道的虚拟筛选策略,对74种化合物进行多样性和药物相似性筛选、AutoDock Vina分子对接、短分子动力学细化和MM/PBSA评分。优先配合物进行了1000 ns分子动力学模拟、自由能景观分析、蛋白质相互作用破坏指标的定量评估以及ADMET分析。比较MM/PBSA计算评估了相对于载脂蛋白复合物,配体诱导的Skp2-Cks1相互作用能的变化。采用体外均质时间分辨荧光(HTRF)法评估生物化学抑制活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Molecular Modeling
Journal of Molecular Modeling 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
362
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Modeling focuses on "hardcore" modeling, publishing high-quality research and reports. Founded in 1995 as a purely electronic journal, it has adapted its format to include a full-color print edition, and adjusted its aims and scope fit the fast-changing field of molecular modeling, with a particular focus on three-dimensional modeling. Today, the journal covers all aspects of molecular modeling including life science modeling; materials modeling; new methods; and computational chemistry. Topics include computer-aided molecular design; rational drug design, de novo ligand design, receptor modeling and docking; cheminformatics, data analysis, visualization and mining; computational medicinal chemistry; homology modeling; simulation of peptides, DNA and other biopolymers; quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) and ADME-modeling; modeling of biological reaction mechanisms; and combined experimental and computational studies in which calculations play a major role.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书