Emotional experiences of workplace violence in the intensive care unit.

IF 3.8 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Gisela Vogel, Fredric Sjöberg, Cecilia Naurèn, Martin Salzmann-Erikson, Anna Schandl
{"title":"Emotional experiences of workplace violence in the intensive care unit.","authors":"Gisela Vogel, Fredric Sjöberg, Cecilia Naurèn, Martin Salzmann-Erikson, Anna Schandl","doi":"10.1177/09697330261489571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWorkplace violence is common in intensive care units and is often regarded as an inevitable aspect of the job. This normalisation may obscure the emotional impact of violence on healthcare professionals and the ethical tensions that arise when altruistic caregiving values conflict with personal safety. Therefore, this study was conducted to explore healthcare professionals' emotional experiences of workplace violence within the context of intensive care.Research designThis study constitutes a secondary, inductive analysis of data originally collected in 37 semi-structured interviews. The interviews were conducted between November 2024 and March 2025 in intensive care units across five hospitals in Sweden. Data were interpreted using Reflexive thematic analysis.Ethical considerationsEthical aspects were carefully considered throughout the study in line with established ethical principles. Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all individuals before the interview. Data confidentiality was ensured, and all direct quotes were anonymised.FindingsParticipants' descriptions of their emotional experiences generated three themes. A conflict between professional obligation and human vulnerability captured how participants experienced a tension between the expectation to remain composed in their professional roles and their human vulnerability. Balancing core values of caregiving with safety illustrated the professional and moral dilemmas that emerged when violence or escalating aggression forced healthcare professionals to reconcile their commitment to compassionate care. Organisational conditions influencing emotional responses reflected the conditions that either support or undermine ICU healthcare professionals' emotional resilience when they encounter violence.ConclusionsWorkplace violence in intensive care was experienced as more than a threat to personal safety; participants described how it challenged their professional identity and caring values. Organisational conditions influenced how healthcare professionals experienced and managed these challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330261489571"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330261489571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundWorkplace violence is common in intensive care units and is often regarded as an inevitable aspect of the job. This normalisation may obscure the emotional impact of violence on healthcare professionals and the ethical tensions that arise when altruistic caregiving values conflict with personal safety. Therefore, this study was conducted to explore healthcare professionals' emotional experiences of workplace violence within the context of intensive care.Research designThis study constitutes a secondary, inductive analysis of data originally collected in 37 semi-structured interviews. The interviews were conducted between November 2024 and March 2025 in intensive care units across five hospitals in Sweden. Data were interpreted using Reflexive thematic analysis.Ethical considerationsEthical aspects were carefully considered throughout the study in line with established ethical principles. Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all individuals before the interview. Data confidentiality was ensured, and all direct quotes were anonymised.FindingsParticipants' descriptions of their emotional experiences generated three themes. A conflict between professional obligation and human vulnerability captured how participants experienced a tension between the expectation to remain composed in their professional roles and their human vulnerability. Balancing core values of caregiving with safety illustrated the professional and moral dilemmas that emerged when violence or escalating aggression forced healthcare professionals to reconcile their commitment to compassionate care. Organisational conditions influencing emotional responses reflected the conditions that either support or undermine ICU healthcare professionals' emotional resilience when they encounter violence.ConclusionsWorkplace violence in intensive care was experienced as more than a threat to personal safety; participants described how it challenged their professional identity and caring values. Organisational conditions influenced how healthcare professionals experienced and managed these challenges.

重症监护室工作场所暴力的情感体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书