A fast and reliable quality assurance framework for CBCT-based synthetic CTs for adaptive proton radiotherapy.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Arthur Galapon, Andreas Johan Smolders, Dirk Wagenaar, Stefan Both, Francesca Albertini
{"title":"A fast and reliable quality assurance framework for CBCT-based synthetic CTs for adaptive proton radiotherapy.","authors":"Arthur Galapon, Andreas Johan Smolders, Dirk Wagenaar, Stefan Both, Francesca Albertini","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/aeb645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>&#xD;Cone beam CT based synthetic CTs (sCTs) enable online adaptive proton therapy by preserving daily patient anatomy without additional acquisition of diagnostic-quality CTs. However, clinical adoption is limited by the lack of fast, reliable quality assurance (QA) methods. This study proposes and evaluates a practical QA workflow to assess sCT suitability for proton dose optimization. &#xD;Approach:&#xD;A two-step sCT-QA workflow was developed in which a candidate sCT intended for reoptimization (sCTref) is compared with an independently generated secondary sCT (sCTtest). The workflow combines image based metrics and dose based metrics, with doses derived from recalculating a template proton plan on both sCTs. In this study, the framework was evaluated using a deformably propagated virtual CT (vCT) as sCTref and either a deep learning-based sCT (sCTDL) or an analytically corrected CBCT (CBCTcorr) as sCTtest. Same-day CTs were deformably registered to the CBCT and used as ground truth (CTGT) for evaluation. Thresholds were optimized using 5-fold cross-validation on 182 head and neck (H&N) CT-CBCT pairs. Dose calculation suitability was defined as a gamma pass rate (2%, 1mm) exceeding 95% between dose distributions computed on sCT and CTGT. The method was further tested on an external H&N dataset and on abdominal cases.&#xD;Main Results:&#xD;Optimal classification performance was achieved using a combination of image mean absolute error (MAE) and dose MAE. On the H&N test set, the workflow achieved balanced accuracies of 91.2% and 89.7% for the vCT-CBCTcorr and vCT-sCTDL comparisons, respectively, while maintaining a low false positive rate. When applied without modifications to the external H&N and abdominal datasets, balanced accuracy was 94.7% (HN) and 85.0% (abdominal) for vCT-CBCTcorr, and 37.9% (HN) and 61.1% (abdominal) for vCT-sCTDL.&#xD;Significance:&#xD;This study introduces a clinically feasible sCT QA workflow for CBCT based adaptive proton therapy and showed promising transferability across datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aeb645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cone beam CT based synthetic CTs (sCTs) enable online adaptive proton therapy by preserving daily patient anatomy without additional acquisition of diagnostic-quality CTs. However, clinical adoption is limited by the lack of fast, reliable quality assurance (QA) methods. This study proposes and evaluates a practical QA workflow to assess sCT suitability for proton dose optimization. Approach: A two-step sCT-QA workflow was developed in which a candidate sCT intended for reoptimization (sCTref) is compared with an independently generated secondary sCT (sCTtest). The workflow combines image based metrics and dose based metrics, with doses derived from recalculating a template proton plan on both sCTs. In this study, the framework was evaluated using a deformably propagated virtual CT (vCT) as sCTref and either a deep learning-based sCT (sCTDL) or an analytically corrected CBCT (CBCTcorr) as sCTtest. Same-day CTs were deformably registered to the CBCT and used as ground truth (CTGT) for evaluation. Thresholds were optimized using 5-fold cross-validation on 182 head and neck (H&N) CT-CBCT pairs. Dose calculation suitability was defined as a gamma pass rate (2%, 1mm) exceeding 95% between dose distributions computed on sCT and CTGT. The method was further tested on an external H&N dataset and on abdominal cases. Main Results: Optimal classification performance was achieved using a combination of image mean absolute error (MAE) and dose MAE. On the H&N test set, the workflow achieved balanced accuracies of 91.2% and 89.7% for the vCT-CBCTcorr and vCT-sCTDL comparisons, respectively, while maintaining a low false positive rate. When applied without modifications to the external H&N and abdominal datasets, balanced accuracy was 94.7% (HN) and 85.0% (abdominal) for vCT-CBCTcorr, and 37.9% (HN) and 61.1% (abdominal) for vCT-sCTDL. Significance: This study introduces a clinically feasible sCT QA workflow for CBCT based adaptive proton therapy and showed promising transferability across datasets.

基于cbct的合成ct自适应质子放疗快速可靠的质量保证框架。
目的:基于锥形束CT的合成CT (sCTs)通过保留日常患者解剖结构而无需额外获取诊断质量的CT,从而实现在线适应性质子治疗。然而,由于缺乏快速、可靠的质量保证(QA)方法,临床应用受到限制。本研究提出并评估了一个实用的QA工作流程,以评估质子剂量优化的sCT适用性。方法:开发了两步sCT- qa工作流程,其中用于重新优化的候选sCT (sCTref)与独立生成的次要sCT (sCTtest)进行比较。该工作流程结合了基于图像的指标和基于剂量的指标,并通过重新计算两个sct上的质子计划模板得出剂量。在本研究中,使用可变形传播的虚拟CT (vCT)作为sCTref,使用基于深度学习的sCT (sCTDL)或分析校正的CBCT (CBCTcorr)作为sCTtest来评估该框架。当日ct以变形方式登记到CBCT中,并用作基础真值(CTGT)进行评估。对182对头颈部(H&N) CT-CBCT进行5倍交叉验证,优化阈值。剂量计算适用性定义为sCT和CTGT计算的剂量分布之间的γ通过率(2%,1mm)超过95%。在外部H&N数据集和腹部病例上进一步测试了该方法。主要结果:使用图像平均绝对误差(MAE)和剂量MAE相结合的方法获得了最佳的分类性能。在H&N测试集上,vCT-CBCTcorr和vCT-sCTDL比较的工作流程分别达到了91.2%和89.7%的平衡准确率,同时保持了较低的假阳性率。当不修改外部H&N和腹部数据集时,vCT-CBCTcorr的平衡准确性为94.7% (HN)和85.0%(腹部),vCT-sCTDL的平衡准确性为37.9% (HN)和61.1%(腹部)。意义:本研究为基于CBCT的适应性质子治疗引入了临床可行的sCT QA工作流程,并显示了数据集之间有希望的可转移性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书