Arthur Galapon, Andreas Johan Smolders, Dirk Wagenaar, Stefan Both, Francesca Albertini
{"title":"A fast and reliable quality assurance framework for CBCT-based synthetic CTs for adaptive proton radiotherapy.","authors":"Arthur Galapon, Andreas Johan Smolders, Dirk Wagenaar, Stefan Both, Francesca Albertini","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/aeb645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>
Cone beam CT based synthetic CTs (sCTs) enable online adaptive proton therapy by preserving daily patient anatomy without additional acquisition of diagnostic-quality CTs. However, clinical adoption is limited by the lack of fast, reliable quality assurance (QA) methods. This study proposes and evaluates a practical QA workflow to assess sCT suitability for proton dose optimization. 
Approach:
A two-step sCT-QA workflow was developed in which a candidate sCT intended for reoptimization (sCTref) is compared with an independently generated secondary sCT (sCTtest). The workflow combines image based metrics and dose based metrics, with doses derived from recalculating a template proton plan on both sCTs. In this study, the framework was evaluated using a deformably propagated virtual CT (vCT) as sCTref and either a deep learning-based sCT (sCTDL) or an analytically corrected CBCT (CBCTcorr) as sCTtest. Same-day CTs were deformably registered to the CBCT and used as ground truth (CTGT) for evaluation. Thresholds were optimized using 5-fold cross-validation on 182 head and neck (H&N) CT-CBCT pairs. Dose calculation suitability was defined as a gamma pass rate (2%, 1mm) exceeding 95% between dose distributions computed on sCT and CTGT. The method was further tested on an external H&N dataset and on abdominal cases.
Main Results:
Optimal classification performance was achieved using a combination of image mean absolute error (MAE) and dose MAE. On the H&N test set, the workflow achieved balanced accuracies of 91.2% and 89.7% for the vCT-CBCTcorr and vCT-sCTDL comparisons, respectively, while maintaining a low false positive rate. When applied without modifications to the external H&N and abdominal datasets, balanced accuracy was 94.7% (HN) and 85.0% (abdominal) for vCT-CBCTcorr, and 37.9% (HN) and 61.1% (abdominal) for vCT-sCTDL.
Significance:
This study introduces a clinically feasible sCT QA workflow for CBCT based adaptive proton therapy and showed promising transferability across datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aeb645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective:
Cone beam CT based synthetic CTs (sCTs) enable online adaptive proton therapy by preserving daily patient anatomy without additional acquisition of diagnostic-quality CTs. However, clinical adoption is limited by the lack of fast, reliable quality assurance (QA) methods. This study proposes and evaluates a practical QA workflow to assess sCT suitability for proton dose optimization.
Approach:
A two-step sCT-QA workflow was developed in which a candidate sCT intended for reoptimization (sCTref) is compared with an independently generated secondary sCT (sCTtest). The workflow combines image based metrics and dose based metrics, with doses derived from recalculating a template proton plan on both sCTs. In this study, the framework was evaluated using a deformably propagated virtual CT (vCT) as sCTref and either a deep learning-based sCT (sCTDL) or an analytically corrected CBCT (CBCTcorr) as sCTtest. Same-day CTs were deformably registered to the CBCT and used as ground truth (CTGT) for evaluation. Thresholds were optimized using 5-fold cross-validation on 182 head and neck (H&N) CT-CBCT pairs. Dose calculation suitability was defined as a gamma pass rate (2%, 1mm) exceeding 95% between dose distributions computed on sCT and CTGT. The method was further tested on an external H&N dataset and on abdominal cases.
Main Results:
Optimal classification performance was achieved using a combination of image mean absolute error (MAE) and dose MAE. On the H&N test set, the workflow achieved balanced accuracies of 91.2% and 89.7% for the vCT-CBCTcorr and vCT-sCTDL comparisons, respectively, while maintaining a low false positive rate. When applied without modifications to the external H&N and abdominal datasets, balanced accuracy was 94.7% (HN) and 85.0% (abdominal) for vCT-CBCTcorr, and 37.9% (HN) and 61.1% (abdominal) for vCT-sCTDL.
Significance:
This study introduces a clinically feasible sCT QA workflow for CBCT based adaptive proton therapy and showed promising transferability across datasets.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry