The blood-brain tumor barrier as a spatial immune checkpoint in glioblastoma: leukocyte entry, perivascular retention, and therapeutic implications.

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Frontiers in Immunology Pub Date : 2026-10-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1957858
Fangbo Lin
{"title":"The blood-brain tumor barrier as a spatial immune checkpoint in glioblastoma: leukocyte entry, perivascular retention, and therapeutic implications.","authors":"Fangbo Lin","doi":"10.3389/fimmu.2026.1957858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glioblastoma (GBM) combines heterogeneous vascular dysfunction with a predominantly myeloid immune landscape. This Mini Review focuses on a specific problem: vascular permeability is not equivalent to productive leukocyte access. Entry requires endothelial capture, chemokine-guided arrest, transendothelial migration, release from perivascular sites, intratumoral dispersion, target recognition, and sustained effector function. Human tissue and spatial studies show regionally distinct neurovascular and myeloid states, whereas much of the causal evidence for trafficking and retention remains preclinical. We therefore distinguish published observations from a hypothesis-generating model in which the blood-brain tumor barrier (BBTB) and perivascular myeloid niche can act as coupled but separable checkpoints. The main conceptual advance is not the already recognized heterogeneity of the BBTB, but the argument that leakage-based imaging should not be used as a surrogate for immune-cell entry and that each trafficking stage requires its own pharmacodynamic readout. We summarize regional BBTB states, differential lymphoid and myeloid access, and selected strategies-vascular normalization, myeloid reprogramming, local cell delivery, and focused ultrasound-while emphasizing their evidence limits. Clinical translation will require spatially registered human sampling, explicit model provenance, and tests that can reject individual components of the framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":12622,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Immunology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1957858"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13678291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1957858","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) combines heterogeneous vascular dysfunction with a predominantly myeloid immune landscape. This Mini Review focuses on a specific problem: vascular permeability is not equivalent to productive leukocyte access. Entry requires endothelial capture, chemokine-guided arrest, transendothelial migration, release from perivascular sites, intratumoral dispersion, target recognition, and sustained effector function. Human tissue and spatial studies show regionally distinct neurovascular and myeloid states, whereas much of the causal evidence for trafficking and retention remains preclinical. We therefore distinguish published observations from a hypothesis-generating model in which the blood-brain tumor barrier (BBTB) and perivascular myeloid niche can act as coupled but separable checkpoints. The main conceptual advance is not the already recognized heterogeneity of the BBTB, but the argument that leakage-based imaging should not be used as a surrogate for immune-cell entry and that each trafficking stage requires its own pharmacodynamic readout. We summarize regional BBTB states, differential lymphoid and myeloid access, and selected strategies-vascular normalization, myeloid reprogramming, local cell delivery, and focused ultrasound-while emphasizing their evidence limits. Clinical translation will require spatially registered human sampling, explicit model provenance, and tests that can reject individual components of the framework.

血脑肿瘤屏障作为胶质母细胞瘤的空间免疫检查点:白细胞进入、血管周围滞留和治疗意义。
胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)结合了异质性血管功能障碍和主要的髓系免疫景观。这个迷你评论集中在一个特定的问题:血管通透性不等同于生产性白细胞的访问。进入需要内皮捕获、趋化因子引导的阻滞、跨内皮迁移、从血管周围部位释放、肿瘤内弥散、目标识别和持续的效应功能。人体组织和空间研究显示区域不同的神经血管和髓系状态,而大部分关于贩运和滞留的因果证据仍停留在临床前。因此,我们将已发表的观察结果与假设生成模型区分开来,在假设生成模型中,血脑肿瘤屏障(BBTB)和血管周围髓系生态位可以作为耦合但可分离的检查点。主要的概念进步不是已经认识到的BBTB的异质性,而是基于泄漏的成像不应该用作免疫细胞进入的替代品,并且每个运输阶段都需要自己的药效学数据。我们总结了区域BBTB状态、淋巴细胞和髓细胞通路的差异,以及选择的策略——血管正常化、髓细胞重编程、局部细胞递送和聚焦超声——同时强调了它们的证据局限性。临床翻译将需要空间注册的人类样本,明确的模型来源,以及可以拒绝框架单个组件的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
11.00%
发文量
7153
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Immunology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across basic, translational and clinical immunology. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Immunology is the official Journal of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS). Encompassing the entire field of Immunology, this journal welcomes papers that investigate basic mechanisms of immune system development and function, with a particular emphasis given to the description of the clinical and immunological phenotype of human immune disorders, and on the definition of their molecular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书