Development and validation of the synthetic index of palliative care integration into primary health care.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Carolina Muñoz Olivar, Juan Sebastián Gomez Quintero, Fernando Pastrana Rendon, Carla Taramasco Toro, Miguel Antonio Sanchez-Cardenas, Carlos Javier Avendaño-Vásquez
{"title":"Development and validation of the synthetic index of palliative care integration into primary health care.","authors":"Carolina Muñoz Olivar, Juan Sebastián Gomez Quintero, Fernando Pastrana Rendon, Carla Taramasco Toro, Miguel Antonio Sanchez-Cardenas, Carlos Javier Avendaño-Vásquez","doi":"10.1186/s12913-026-15191-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrating palliative care (PC) into primary health care (PHC) is essential to achieve universal health coverage and equity. However, most countries lack concise and validated tools to monitor this process. This study developed and validated a composite index to measure the degree of PC integration into PHC at the departmental level in Colombia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An ecological, cross-sectional study was conducted across 33 territorial units in Colombia (32 departments plus Bogotá D.C.) in 2024. Eight of 15 candidate indicators were retained to construct the index. Each indicator was normalized using a Min-Max linear transformation [0-1] and analyzed through principal component analysis with varimax rotation. The Synthetic Index of Palliative Care Integration into Primary Health Care (SIPCI) was built using a hierarchical weighting scheme combining domain-level and within-domain weights. Stability was assessed through jackknife leave-one-out, alternative normalizations methods, and four robustness scenarios including Monte Carlo perturbations. External validity was examined through correlations with socioeconomic and service-related variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SIPCI scores ranged from 0.04 to 0.71 (mean 0.38, SD 0.13). Overall, 52% of departments showed low or medium-low integration, while 48% showed medium-high or high integration. A clear spatial gradient was observed, with higher integration in central departments and Bogotá, and lower integration in Amazon and Orinoquia regions. Sampling adequacy was good (KMO = 0.742). Information loss was low (NMSE = 0.13; 0.10 after indicator reduction). Leave-one-out analyses showed strong concordance with the baseline index (Spearman [Formula: see text]; Kendall [Formula: see text]). Five subcomponents were identified, which rural accessibility and undergraduate PC training contributing most. The correlation between SIPCI and departmental income was positive but moderate, indicating that economic capacity may facilitate, but does not determine integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SIPCI provides a reproducible, system-level measure for monitoring and benchmarking territorial patterns of palliative care integration within primary health care in Colombia. The findings describe marked geographic heterogeneity and support the use of SIPCI for routine monitoring and planning, without implying causal mechanisms or patient-level effects. Although the index showed good internal coherence and robustness, further studies may help strengthen its construct validity and assess its applicability in other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13682114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15191-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Integrating palliative care (PC) into primary health care (PHC) is essential to achieve universal health coverage and equity. However, most countries lack concise and validated tools to monitor this process. This study developed and validated a composite index to measure the degree of PC integration into PHC at the departmental level in Colombia.

Methods: An ecological, cross-sectional study was conducted across 33 territorial units in Colombia (32 departments plus Bogotá D.C.) in 2024. Eight of 15 candidate indicators were retained to construct the index. Each indicator was normalized using a Min-Max linear transformation [0-1] and analyzed through principal component analysis with varimax rotation. The Synthetic Index of Palliative Care Integration into Primary Health Care (SIPCI) was built using a hierarchical weighting scheme combining domain-level and within-domain weights. Stability was assessed through jackknife leave-one-out, alternative normalizations methods, and four robustness scenarios including Monte Carlo perturbations. External validity was examined through correlations with socioeconomic and service-related variables.

Results: SIPCI scores ranged from 0.04 to 0.71 (mean 0.38, SD 0.13). Overall, 52% of departments showed low or medium-low integration, while 48% showed medium-high or high integration. A clear spatial gradient was observed, with higher integration in central departments and Bogotá, and lower integration in Amazon and Orinoquia regions. Sampling adequacy was good (KMO = 0.742). Information loss was low (NMSE = 0.13; 0.10 after indicator reduction). Leave-one-out analyses showed strong concordance with the baseline index (Spearman [Formula: see text]; Kendall [Formula: see text]). Five subcomponents were identified, which rural accessibility and undergraduate PC training contributing most. The correlation between SIPCI and departmental income was positive but moderate, indicating that economic capacity may facilitate, but does not determine integration.

Conclusions: The SIPCI provides a reproducible, system-level measure for monitoring and benchmarking territorial patterns of palliative care integration within primary health care in Colombia. The findings describe marked geographic heterogeneity and support the use of SIPCI for routine monitoring and planning, without implying causal mechanisms or patient-level effects. Although the index showed good internal coherence and robustness, further studies may help strengthen its construct validity and assess its applicability in other settings.

姑息治疗纳入初级卫生保健综合指标的开发与验证。
背景:将姑息治疗(PC)纳入初级卫生保健(PHC)对于实现全民健康覆盖和公平至关重要。然而,大多数国家缺乏简明和有效的工具来监测这一进程。本研究开发并验证了一个综合指数,以衡量哥伦比亚省一级初级保健与个人保健的整合程度。方法:2024年在哥伦比亚33个地区单位(32个省加上波哥大)进行了生态横断面研究。15个候选指标中的8个被保留来构建指数。使用Min-Max线性变换[0-1]对各指标进行归一化,并通过varimax旋转主成分分析进行分析。采用域级权和域内权相结合的分层赋权方案,构建姑息治疗融入初级卫生保健综合指数(SIPCI)。稳定性通过折刀留一、可选归一化方法和包括蒙特卡洛摄动在内的四种鲁棒性情景进行评估。通过与社会经济和服务相关变量的相关性来检验外部效度。结果:SIPCI评分范围为0.04 ~ 0.71(平均0.38,标准差0.13)。总体而言,52%的部门表现为低整合或中低整合,48%的部门表现为中高整合或高整合。中部地区和波哥大地区一体化程度较高,亚马逊地区和奥里诺克地区一体化程度较低,具有明显的空间梯度。抽样充分性良好(KMO = 0.742)。信息丢失较低(NMSE = 0.13,降低指标后为0.10)。“留一”分析显示与基线指数有很强的一致性(Spearman[公式:见文本];Kendall[公式:见文本])。其中农村可及性和大学生电脑培训贡献最大。SIPCI与部门收入呈正相关,但相关性不大,表明经济能力可能促进整合,但不决定整合。结论:SIPCI提供了一种可重复的系统级措施,用于监测和基准化哥伦比亚初级卫生保健中姑息治疗整合的区域模式。研究结果描述了明显的地理异质性,并支持将SIPCI用于常规监测和计划,但没有暗示因果机制或患者层面的影响。虽然该指标具有良好的内部一致性和稳健性,但进一步的研究可以增强其结构效度,并评估其在其他环境中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书