Filament deposition modeling quality assurance testing for the medical physicist

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Benjamin T. Heggie, Manuel Arreola, Stephanie M. Leon, Izabella L. Barreto
{"title":"Filament deposition modeling quality assurance testing for the medical physicist","authors":"Benjamin T. Heggie,&nbsp;Manuel Arreola,&nbsp;Stephanie M. Leon,&nbsp;Izabella L. Barreto","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Filament deposition modeling (FDM) can be a practical method for producing quality control (QC) imaging resources for the clinic. However, frequent printing may degrade print quality over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To develop a process to ensure prints for the diagnostic physicist are accurate and reproducible.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four FDM systems were evaluated by printing a custom, novel QC model on each printer 12 times over a period of 12 months. Several tests were performed, including print resolvability (lp/cm), XYZ dimension accuracy (mm), density (g/cm3), line width (mm), XY position accuracy (mm), clearance fits (mm), and thickness uniformity (mm). Polylactic acid (PLA) samples were printed, measured, and imaged with a dual energy CT scanner. Linear regression models were then created to monitor changes in QC density measurements as a function of x-ray and material property characteristics (i.e., Hounsfield units and electron density). Between monthly prints, heat uniformity across the build plate was also tested for each printer using a NIST-certified infrared thermometer and 3D printed grids. All physical measurements were obtained using a calibrated digital caliper and milligram scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Mean percent error (MPE) for all tests was calculated from ground truth (CAD dimensions and filament density) and baseline values (first month of QC measurements). Among printers investigated, MPE was ± 5% of ground truth for all tests except density and thickness uniformity. Baseline MPE was also observed within ± 5% except for resolvability and clearance fit tests among printers. Subtle trend increases were presented for higher density QC prints based on DECT linear regression models. Reduced chi-squared values indicate uniform and reproducible heat bed temperature measurements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This work offers an innovative approach toward evaluating and monitoring FDM system performance. Future work should track performance over a longer time period and across a wider variety of printers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70856","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70856","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Filament deposition modeling (FDM) can be a practical method for producing quality control (QC) imaging resources for the clinic. However, frequent printing may degrade print quality over time.

Purpose

To develop a process to ensure prints for the diagnostic physicist are accurate and reproducible.

Methods

Four FDM systems were evaluated by printing a custom, novel QC model on each printer 12 times over a period of 12 months. Several tests were performed, including print resolvability (lp/cm), XYZ dimension accuracy (mm), density (g/cm3), line width (mm), XY position accuracy (mm), clearance fits (mm), and thickness uniformity (mm). Polylactic acid (PLA) samples were printed, measured, and imaged with a dual energy CT scanner. Linear regression models were then created to monitor changes in QC density measurements as a function of x-ray and material property characteristics (i.e., Hounsfield units and electron density). Between monthly prints, heat uniformity across the build plate was also tested for each printer using a NIST-certified infrared thermometer and 3D printed grids. All physical measurements were obtained using a calibrated digital caliper and milligram scale.

Results

Mean percent error (MPE) for all tests was calculated from ground truth (CAD dimensions and filament density) and baseline values (first month of QC measurements). Among printers investigated, MPE was ± 5% of ground truth for all tests except density and thickness uniformity. Baseline MPE was also observed within ± 5% except for resolvability and clearance fit tests among printers. Subtle trend increases were presented for higher density QC prints based on DECT linear regression models. Reduced chi-squared values indicate uniform and reproducible heat bed temperature measurements.

Conclusions

This work offers an innovative approach toward evaluating and monitoring FDM system performance. Future work should track performance over a longer time period and across a wider variety of printers.

医疗物理学家的长丝沉积建模质量保证测试
灯丝沉积建模(FDM)是一种为临床生产质量控制(QC)成像资源的实用方法。然而,随着时间的推移,频繁的打印可能会降低打印质量。目的开发一种流程,以确保诊断物理学家的打印是准确的和可复制的。方法在12个月的时间里,在每台打印机上打印12次定制的新型QC模型,对4个FDM系统进行评估。进行了多项测试,包括打印分辨率(lp/cm)、XYZ尺寸精度(mm)、密度(g/cm3)、线宽(mm)、XY位置精度(mm)、间隙配合(mm)和厚度均匀性(mm)。对聚乳酸(PLA)样品进行打印、测量,并用双能CT扫描仪成像。然后创建线性回归模型来监测QC密度测量的变化,作为x射线和材料特性特征(即霍斯菲尔德单位和电子密度)的函数。在每月打印之间,还使用nist认证的红外温度计和3D打印网格对每个打印机的构建板进行了热均匀性测试。所有物理测量都是使用校准过的数字卡尺和毫克刻度获得的。结果:所有测试的平均误差百分比(MPE)是根据基本事实(CAD尺寸和灯丝密度)和基线值(QC测量的第一个月)计算的。在被调查的打印机中,除密度和厚度均匀性外,所有测试的MPE均为地面真实值的±5%。除了打印机之间的分辨率和间隙配合测试外,基线MPE也在±5%以内。基于DECT线性回归模型的高密度QC印刷品呈现出细微的增加趋势。减少卡方值表示均匀和可重复的热床温度测量。本研究为FDM系统性能的评估和监测提供了一种创新的方法。未来的工作应该在更长的时间和更广泛的打印机上跟踪性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书