Dynamic Proton arc therapy for paediatric parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Andreas Havsgård Handeland, Hardev Singh Grewal, Camilla Grindeland Boer, Daniel J. Indelicato, Kristian Smeland Ytre-Hauge, Helge Henjum, Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg
{"title":"Dynamic Proton arc therapy for paediatric parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma","authors":"Andreas Havsgård Handeland,&nbsp;Hardev Singh Grewal,&nbsp;Camilla Grindeland Boer,&nbsp;Daniel J. Indelicato,&nbsp;Kristian Smeland Ytre-Hauge,&nbsp;Helge Henjum,&nbsp;Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Parameningeal rhabdomyosarcomas (PM-RMS) are pediatric tumors with a high risk of local failure and severe toxicity. Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) offers improved healthy tissue sparing compared to conventional photon-based radiotherapy, and proton arc therapy (PAT) might offer further improvement in healthy tissue sparing for these patients, thus emphasizing the need for systematic studies specifically focusing on PM-RMS patients. Additionally, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is known to vary with linear energy transfer (LET).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of LET-optimized PAT for PM-RMS treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, IMPT and PAT plans, both with and without LET optimization were made for 13 PM-RMS patients using Raystation version 2023B. The plans were evaluated based on the achievement of clinical goals, homogeneity index, delivery time, robustness, LET and variable RBE-weighted dose within the target and selected OARs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>LET optimization increased the mean LET in the target from 2.5 keV/µm [2.1, 2.8] to 3.4 keV/µm [2.7, 4.1] for IMPT and from 2.8 keV/µm [2.5, 3.1] to 3.4 keV/µm [2.7, 4.0] for PAT with minor changes in dose distributions. Target coverage and OAR doses were comparable between IMPT and PAT, while both had an expected improvement in OAR sparing compared to VMAT. Delivery times were 134.5 [95.3, 203.7] seconds for the IMPT plans and 197.4 [138.9, 244.6] seconds for the PAT plans before LET optimization, and were for both modalities reduced by around 2–5 seconds after LET optimization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The dose distribution was similar across PAT and IMPT in this study, and superior compared to VMAT. LET optimization in the proton plans achieved LET improvements in both target and OARs without compromising dose.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70867","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Parameningeal rhabdomyosarcomas (PM-RMS) are pediatric tumors with a high risk of local failure and severe toxicity. Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) offers improved healthy tissue sparing compared to conventional photon-based radiotherapy, and proton arc therapy (PAT) might offer further improvement in healthy tissue sparing for these patients, thus emphasizing the need for systematic studies specifically focusing on PM-RMS patients. Additionally, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is known to vary with linear energy transfer (LET).

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of LET-optimized PAT for PM-RMS treatment.

Methods

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, IMPT and PAT plans, both with and without LET optimization were made for 13 PM-RMS patients using Raystation version 2023B. The plans were evaluated based on the achievement of clinical goals, homogeneity index, delivery time, robustness, LET and variable RBE-weighted dose within the target and selected OARs.

Results

LET optimization increased the mean LET in the target from 2.5 keV/µm [2.1, 2.8] to 3.4 keV/µm [2.7, 4.1] for IMPT and from 2.8 keV/µm [2.5, 3.1] to 3.4 keV/µm [2.7, 4.0] for PAT with minor changes in dose distributions. Target coverage and OAR doses were comparable between IMPT and PAT, while both had an expected improvement in OAR sparing compared to VMAT. Delivery times were 134.5 [95.3, 203.7] seconds for the IMPT plans and 197.4 [138.9, 244.6] seconds for the PAT plans before LET optimization, and were for both modalities reduced by around 2–5 seconds after LET optimization.

Conclusions

The dose distribution was similar across PAT and IMPT in this study, and superior compared to VMAT. LET optimization in the proton plans achieved LET improvements in both target and OARs without compromising dose.

动态质子弧治疗小儿脊膜旁横纹肌肉瘤
背景:脊膜旁横纹肌肉瘤(PM-RMS)是一种局部衰竭风险高、毒性严重的儿科肿瘤。与传统的光子放射治疗相比,强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)可以改善健康组织的保留,而质子弧治疗(PAT)可能会进一步改善这些患者的健康组织保留,因此强调需要专门针对PM-RMS患者进行系统研究。此外,已知质子的相对生物有效性(RBE)随线性能量转移(LET)而变化。目的探讨let优化的PAT在PM-RMS治疗中的潜力。方法采用Raystation version 2023B软件对13例PM-RMS患者进行容积调制弧线治疗(VMAT)方案、IMPT方案和PAT方案,并进行LET优化。根据临床目标的实现情况、均匀性指数、递送时间、稳健性、LET和目标及选定OARs内的可变rbe加权剂量对计划进行评估。结果LET优化使IMPT靶细胞的平均LET从2.5 keV/µm[2.1, 2.8]增加到3.4 keV/µm [2.7, 4.1], PAT靶细胞的LET从2.8 keV/µm[2.5, 3.1]增加到3.4 keV/µm[2.7, 4.0],剂量分布变化不大。IMPT和PAT之间的靶覆盖率和OAR剂量相当,而与VMAT相比,两者在OAR节约方面都有预期的改善。在LET优化之前,IMPT计划的交货时间为134.5[95.3,203.7]秒,PAT计划的交货时间为197.4[138.9,244.6]秒,而在LET优化后,两种模式的交货时间都减少了约2-5秒。结论本研究中PAT和IMPT的剂量分布相似,且优于VMAT。质子计划中的LET优化在不影响剂量的情况下实现了靶和桨的LET改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书