Management Strategies and Clinical Outcomes of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 5.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Farzad Pourghazi, Seyed Mohammad Amin Alavi, Georges Baaklini, Ahmad Nassr, Brett A Freedman, Takahiro Matsuo, Aaron J Tande, Elie F Berbari
{"title":"Management Strategies and Clinical Outcomes of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Farzad Pourghazi, Seyed Mohammad Amin Alavi, Georges Baaklini, Ahmad Nassr, Brett A Freedman, Takahiro Matsuo, Aaron J Tande, Elie F Berbari","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2026.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) and is associated with persistent infection, complications, prolonged hospitalization, and increased mortality.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the antimicrobial and surgical approaches used for MRSA NVO and their associated clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study setting: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted on November 27, 2025. Studies were eligible if they included adults with MRSA NVO, evaluated medical or surgical treatment strategies, reported clinical outcomes, and included at least five patients. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Murad et al. tool. Random-effects models were used to pool proportions of treatment success, reinfection, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies including 677 patients were included. Treatment strategies were heterogeneous and included prolonged anti-MRSA antimicrobial therapy and surgical approaches ranging from debridement and drainage to decompression and spinal stabilization or fusion. Vancomycin-based regimens were the most frequently reported antimicrobial strategy. Among studies reporting treatment duration, intravenous therapy commonly ranged from 4 to 8 weeks, with some patients receiving oral step-down or suppressive therapy. The pooled treatment success rate was 84.9% (95% CI, 76.7%-90.7%), pooled reinfection rate was 15.3% (95% CI, 9.5%-23.6%), and pooled mortality rate was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.8%-10.8%). Subgroup analyses were not feasible because treatment-specific data were limited and inconsistently reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Management of MRSA NVO varied substantially across studies, with vancomycin-based antimicrobial therapy and diverse surgical strategies commonly reported. Pooled outcomes showed high treatment success with lower rates of reinfection and mortality. The substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the available evidence highlights the need for prospective studies with standardized treatment and outcome reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.10.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) and is associated with persistent infection, complications, prolonged hospitalization, and increased mortality.

Purpose: We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the antimicrobial and surgical approaches used for MRSA NVO and their associated clinical outcomes.

Study setting: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted on November 27, 2025. Studies were eligible if they included adults with MRSA NVO, evaluated medical or surgical treatment strategies, reported clinical outcomes, and included at least five patients. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Murad et al. tool. Random-effects models were used to pool proportions of treatment success, reinfection, and mortality.

Results: Thirty studies including 677 patients were included. Treatment strategies were heterogeneous and included prolonged anti-MRSA antimicrobial therapy and surgical approaches ranging from debridement and drainage to decompression and spinal stabilization or fusion. Vancomycin-based regimens were the most frequently reported antimicrobial strategy. Among studies reporting treatment duration, intravenous therapy commonly ranged from 4 to 8 weeks, with some patients receiving oral step-down or suppressive therapy. The pooled treatment success rate was 84.9% (95% CI, 76.7%-90.7%), pooled reinfection rate was 15.3% (95% CI, 9.5%-23.6%), and pooled mortality rate was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.8%-10.8%). Subgroup analyses were not feasible because treatment-specific data were limited and inconsistently reported.

Conclusions: Management of MRSA NVO varied substantially across studies, with vancomycin-based antimicrobial therapy and diverse surgical strategies commonly reported. Pooled outcomes showed high treatment success with lower rates of reinfection and mortality. The substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the available evidence highlights the need for prospective studies with standardized treatment and outcome reporting.

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌原生椎体骨髓炎的管理策略和临床结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是原发性椎体骨髓炎(NVO)的主要原因,并与持续感染、并发症、住院时间延长和死亡率增加有关。目的:我们进行了这项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估用于MRSA NVO的抗菌和手术方法及其相关的临床结果。研究设置:系统评价和荟萃分析。方法:于2025年11月27日对MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science进行系统文献检索。如果纳入了MRSA NVO的成人患者,评估了医疗或手术治疗策略,报告了临床结果,并且纳入了至少5名患者,则研究是合格的。两位审稿人独立筛选研究并提取数据。使用Newcastle-Ottawa量表和Murad等工具评估偏倚风险。随机效应模型用于汇总治疗成功、再感染和死亡率的比例。结果:纳入30项研究,677例患者。治疗策略是不同的,包括长期抗mrsa抗菌药物治疗和手术方法,从清创和引流到减压和脊柱稳定或融合。万古霉素为基础的方案是最常报道的抗菌策略。在报告治疗时间的研究中,静脉治疗通常为4至8周,一些患者接受口服降压或抑制治疗。合并治疗成功率为84.9% (95% CI, 76.7% ~ 90.7%),合并再感染率为15.3% (95% CI, 9.5% ~ 23.6%),合并死亡率为3.1% (95% CI, 0.8% ~ 10.8%)。亚组分析不可行,因为治疗特异性数据有限且报告不一致。结论:MRSA NVO的治疗方法在不同的研究中有很大的不同,以万古霉素为基础的抗菌治疗和不同的手术策略通常被报道。综合结果显示治疗成功率高,再感染率和死亡率低。现有证据的临床和方法学异质性突出了标准化治疗和结果报告的前瞻性研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书