Management Strategies and Clinical Outcomes of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Farzad Pourghazi, Seyed Mohammad Amin Alavi, Georges Baaklini, Ahmad Nassr, Brett A Freedman, Takahiro Matsuo, Aaron J Tande, Elie F Berbari
{"title":"Management Strategies and Clinical Outcomes of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Farzad Pourghazi, Seyed Mohammad Amin Alavi, Georges Baaklini, Ahmad Nassr, Brett A Freedman, Takahiro Matsuo, Aaron J Tande, Elie F Berbari","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2026.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) and is associated with persistent infection, complications, prolonged hospitalization, and increased mortality.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the antimicrobial and surgical approaches used for MRSA NVO and their associated clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study setting: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted on November 27, 2025. Studies were eligible if they included adults with MRSA NVO, evaluated medical or surgical treatment strategies, reported clinical outcomes, and included at least five patients. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Murad et al. tool. Random-effects models were used to pool proportions of treatment success, reinfection, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies including 677 patients were included. Treatment strategies were heterogeneous and included prolonged anti-MRSA antimicrobial therapy and surgical approaches ranging from debridement and drainage to decompression and spinal stabilization or fusion. Vancomycin-based regimens were the most frequently reported antimicrobial strategy. Among studies reporting treatment duration, intravenous therapy commonly ranged from 4 to 8 weeks, with some patients receiving oral step-down or suppressive therapy. The pooled treatment success rate was 84.9% (95% CI, 76.7%-90.7%), pooled reinfection rate was 15.3% (95% CI, 9.5%-23.6%), and pooled mortality rate was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.8%-10.8%). Subgroup analyses were not feasible because treatment-specific data were limited and inconsistently reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Management of MRSA NVO varied substantially across studies, with vancomycin-based antimicrobial therapy and diverse surgical strategies commonly reported. Pooled outcomes showed high treatment success with lower rates of reinfection and mortality. The substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the available evidence highlights the need for prospective studies with standardized treatment and outcome reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.10.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background context: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) and is associated with persistent infection, complications, prolonged hospitalization, and increased mortality.
Purpose: We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the antimicrobial and surgical approaches used for MRSA NVO and their associated clinical outcomes.
Study setting: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted on November 27, 2025. Studies were eligible if they included adults with MRSA NVO, evaluated medical or surgical treatment strategies, reported clinical outcomes, and included at least five patients. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Murad et al. tool. Random-effects models were used to pool proportions of treatment success, reinfection, and mortality.
Results: Thirty studies including 677 patients were included. Treatment strategies were heterogeneous and included prolonged anti-MRSA antimicrobial therapy and surgical approaches ranging from debridement and drainage to decompression and spinal stabilization or fusion. Vancomycin-based regimens were the most frequently reported antimicrobial strategy. Among studies reporting treatment duration, intravenous therapy commonly ranged from 4 to 8 weeks, with some patients receiving oral step-down or suppressive therapy. The pooled treatment success rate was 84.9% (95% CI, 76.7%-90.7%), pooled reinfection rate was 15.3% (95% CI, 9.5%-23.6%), and pooled mortality rate was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.8%-10.8%). Subgroup analyses were not feasible because treatment-specific data were limited and inconsistently reported.
Conclusions: Management of MRSA NVO varied substantially across studies, with vancomycin-based antimicrobial therapy and diverse surgical strategies commonly reported. Pooled outcomes showed high treatment success with lower rates of reinfection and mortality. The substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the available evidence highlights the need for prospective studies with standardized treatment and outcome reporting.
期刊介绍:
The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.