Patient-Facility Distance and Adjuvant Radiotherapy for WHO Grade 2-3 Meningioma.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Nipun Gorantla, Connor J Kinslow, Dylan K Kim, George Ashji, Sruthi Ranganathan, Joshua A Budhu, Divya Yerramilli, James Janopaul-Naylor, Andrew R Barsky, Gustav Cederquist, Brandon S Imber, Melissa R Zinovoy, Luke R G Pike, Edward Christopher Dee
{"title":"Patient-Facility Distance and Adjuvant Radiotherapy for WHO Grade 2-3 Meningioma.","authors":"Nipun Gorantla, Connor J Kinslow, Dylan K Kim, George Ashji, Sruthi Ranganathan, Joshua A Budhu, Divya Yerramilli, James Janopaul-Naylor, Andrew R Barsky, Gustav Cederquist, Brandon S Imber, Melissa R Zinovoy, Luke R G Pike, Edward Christopher Dee","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used after surgery for WHO grade 2 and 3 meningioma, but the role of patient-facility distance in RT receipt and dose/fractionation choice is not well defined. We examined whether travel distance was associated with receipt and type of adjuvant RT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the National Cancer Database to identify adults diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 with surgically treated WHO grade 2 or 3 meningioma and a CROWFLY distance ≤250 miles. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to WHO grade and extent of resection: grade 2 with gross total resection, grade 2 with subtotal resection/biopsy, and grade 3 with any resection. Outcomes were receipt of adjuvant RT, SRS/HF-SRS versus fractionated EBRT among classifiable RT recipients, and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 14,218 patients, 4063 (28.6%) received adjuvant RT. In multivariate models, the odds of RT receipt decreased with increasing distance, becoming statistically significant at 25 to <50 miles and remaining lower in more distant bins. Among 2767 classifiable RT recipients, greater distance was associated with higher odds of SRS/HF-SRS rather than fractionated EBRT. Distance was not associated with overall survival. Selected fine-bin estimates included OR=1.47 at 25 to <50 miles, OR=2.40 at 75 to <100 miles, and OR=3.08 at 150 to 250 miles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater patient-facility distance was associated with lower receipt of adjuvant RT and greater use of shorter stereotactic regimens among treated patients. These findings support geography as a predictor of both whether and how patients with higher-grade meningioma receive postoperative radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used after surgery for WHO grade 2 and 3 meningioma, but the role of patient-facility distance in RT receipt and dose/fractionation choice is not well defined. We examined whether travel distance was associated with receipt and type of adjuvant RT.

Methods: We used the National Cancer Database to identify adults diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 with surgically treated WHO grade 2 or 3 meningioma and a CROWFLY distance ≤250 miles. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to WHO grade and extent of resection: grade 2 with gross total resection, grade 2 with subtotal resection/biopsy, and grade 3 with any resection. Outcomes were receipt of adjuvant RT, SRS/HF-SRS versus fractionated EBRT among classifiable RT recipients, and overall survival.

Results: Among 14,218 patients, 4063 (28.6%) received adjuvant RT. In multivariate models, the odds of RT receipt decreased with increasing distance, becoming statistically significant at 25 to <50 miles and remaining lower in more distant bins. Among 2767 classifiable RT recipients, greater distance was associated with higher odds of SRS/HF-SRS rather than fractionated EBRT. Distance was not associated with overall survival. Selected fine-bin estimates included OR=1.47 at 25 to <50 miles, OR=2.40 at 75 to <100 miles, and OR=3.08 at 150 to 250 miles.

Conclusions: Greater patient-facility distance was associated with lower receipt of adjuvant RT and greater use of shorter stereotactic regimens among treated patients. These findings support geography as a predictor of both whether and how patients with higher-grade meningioma receive postoperative radiotherapy.

WHO 2-3级脑膜瘤的患者-设施距离和辅助放疗。
目的:WHO 2级和3级脑膜瘤术后常用辅助放疗(RT),但患者-设施距离在RT接收和剂量/分割选择中的作用尚未明确。方法:我们使用国家癌症数据库来识别2010年至2020年间诊断为手术治疗的WHO 2级或3级脑膜瘤且CROWFLY距离≤250英里的成年人。根据WHO分级和切除程度将患者分为3组:2级全切除,2级次全切除/活检,3级任意切除。结果是接受辅助放疗,SRS/HF-SRS与分级EBRT在可分类的放疗接受者中的对比,以及总生存率。结果:在14218名患者中,4063名(28.6%)接受了辅助放疗。在多变量模型中,接受放疗的几率随着距离的增加而降低,在25到25之间变得具有统计学意义。结论:在接受治疗的患者中,越远的患者接受辅助放疗的次数越少,越多地使用较短的立体定向方案。这些发现支持地理位置作为高级别脑膜瘤患者是否以及如何接受术后放疗的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书