Harm reduction among refugees and displaced populations in Lebanon: a systematic review.

IF 4.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Zeinab Abbas, Aline Hajj, Hala Sacre, Samah Tawil, Marwan Akel, Pascale Salameh, Michele Cherfane
{"title":"Harm reduction among refugees and displaced populations in Lebanon: a systematic review.","authors":"Zeinab Abbas, Aline Hajj, Hala Sacre, Samah Tawil, Marwan Akel, Pascale Salameh, Michele Cherfane","doi":"10.1186/s12954-026-01453-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the comprehensiveness of existing policies, strategies, and research regarding harm reduction services for refugees and displaced populations in Lebanon, evaluating service availability, access barriers, and policy gaps to inform targeted and evidence-based interventions and improve health outcomes for this vulnerable group.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review was conducted to examine substance use and harm reduction among refugees in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO. PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched using free-text words and MeSH terms, including substance use, drug use, harm reduction, hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening, hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening, refugees, treatment access, and displaced population. Grey literature from the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health, World Health Organization, and other global reports was reviewed separately and included in the PRISMA flowchart, alongside peer-reviewed studies. The risk for bias in included research papers was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 387 papers (369 peer-reviewed studies and 18 grey literature reports on harm reduction and substance use) were retrieved, and 29 were included in the review after screening and full-text evaluation (17peer reviewed articles and 12 grey literature reports). The results revealed a lack of structured harm reduction policies specifically targeting refugees. The identified barriers include legal restrictions, stigma, and poor integration of harm reduction services into healthcare programs. Of the 12 grey literature documents, only four mentioned harm reduction provision, and none offered a comprehensive strategy to enhance access for this vulnerable group. Many studies were general and lacked focused insights into substance use or harm reduction in refugee settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that current policies require adaptation, as they inadequately address the specific vulnerabilities and barriers faced by refugee populations. Priority actions include adapting policies to refugee contexts, expanding mobile harm reduction clinics to improve accessibility, and integrating HCV screening into refugee healthcare services. Further targeted research is urgently required to characterize substance use patterns among refugees and develop evidence-informed interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13679226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-026-01453-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the comprehensiveness of existing policies, strategies, and research regarding harm reduction services for refugees and displaced populations in Lebanon, evaluating service availability, access barriers, and policy gaps to inform targeted and evidence-based interventions and improve health outcomes for this vulnerable group.

Method: A systematic review was conducted to examine substance use and harm reduction among refugees in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO. PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched using free-text words and MeSH terms, including substance use, drug use, harm reduction, hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening, hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening, refugees, treatment access, and displaced population. Grey literature from the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health, World Health Organization, and other global reports was reviewed separately and included in the PRISMA flowchart, alongside peer-reviewed studies. The risk for bias in included research papers was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools.

Results: A total of 387 papers (369 peer-reviewed studies and 18 grey literature reports on harm reduction and substance use) were retrieved, and 29 were included in the review after screening and full-text evaluation (17peer reviewed articles and 12 grey literature reports). The results revealed a lack of structured harm reduction policies specifically targeting refugees. The identified barriers include legal restrictions, stigma, and poor integration of harm reduction services into healthcare programs. Of the 12 grey literature documents, only four mentioned harm reduction provision, and none offered a comprehensive strategy to enhance access for this vulnerable group. Many studies were general and lacked focused insights into substance use or harm reduction in refugee settings.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that current policies require adaptation, as they inadequately address the specific vulnerabilities and barriers faced by refugee populations. Priority actions include adapting policies to refugee contexts, expanding mobile harm reduction clinics to improve accessibility, and integrating HCV screening into refugee healthcare services. Further targeted research is urgently required to characterize substance use patterns among refugees and develop evidence-informed interventions.

减少黎巴嫩难民和流离失所人口的伤害:系统审查。
目的:本研究旨在评估黎巴嫩难民和流离失所人口减少伤害服务的现有政策、战略和研究的全面性,评估服务的可用性、获取障碍和政策差距,为有针对性和基于证据的干预措施提供信息,并改善这一弱势群体的健康结果。方法:根据PRISMA指南,对难民的物质使用和减少伤害进行系统审查。研究方案已在PROSPERO中注册。使用自由文本词和MeSH术语检索PubMed、EMBASE和谷歌Scholar数据库,包括物质使用、药物使用、减少危害、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)筛查、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)筛查、难民、治疗获取和流离失所人口。来自黎巴嫩公共卫生部、世界卫生组织和其他全球报告的灰色文献分别进行了审查,并与同行评议的研究一起列入了PRISMA流程图。纳入研究论文的偏倚风险使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具进行评估。结果:共检索到387篇论文(369篇同行评议研究和18篇灰色文献报告),经筛选和全文评价后纳入29篇(17篇同行评议文章和12篇灰色文献报告)。结果显示,缺乏专门针对难民的结构性减少伤害政策。确定的障碍包括法律限制、污名化以及将减少伤害服务纳入医疗保健计划的不力。在12份灰色文献文件中,只有4份提到了减少伤害的规定,而且没有一份提供了一项全面的战略,以加强对这一弱势群体的获取。许多研究是一般性的,缺乏对难民环境中药物使用或减少伤害的重点见解。结论:研究结果表明,目前的政策需要调整,因为它们不能充分解决难民人口面临的具体脆弱性和障碍。优先行动包括使政策适应难民情况,扩大减少伤害的流动诊所以改善可及性,并将丙型肝炎病毒筛查纳入难民保健服务。迫切需要进一步进行有针对性的研究,以确定难民药物使用模式的特征,并制定循证干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书