Women's experiences of trauma-informed care in midwifery and maternity services and implications for maternal wellbeing: A qualitative systematic review.
Sofia Thomaidi, Antigoni Sarantaki, Kleanthi Gourounti, Dimitrios Papoutsis, Eirini Orovou
{"title":"Women's experiences of trauma-informed care in midwifery and maternity services and implications for maternal wellbeing: A qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Sofia Thomaidi, Antigoni Sarantaki, Kleanthi Gourounti, Dimitrios Papoutsis, Eirini Orovou","doi":"10.18332/ejm/225227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Trauma-informed care has been increasingly advocated within maternity services as an approach to promote safety, autonomy, and respectful care. However, qualitative evidence exploring how participants experienced trauma-informed care across maternity and midwifery services has not been systematically synthesized. This review therefore aimed to synthesize qualitative evidence on women's experiences of trauma-informed care across maternity services, including midwifery care, during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and ENTREQ guidelines. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) were searched for peer-reviewed qualitative studies published in English. Eligible studies explored women's experiences of trauma-informed, trauma-sensitive, or related care practices within maternity settings. Data were synthesized using thematic synthesis, and methodological quality was appraised using the CASP qualitative checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen qualitative studies were included. Four analytical themes were identified: 1) creating safety and preventing re-traumatization; 2) respectful communication and informed consent; 3) emotional validation, trust, and relational attunement; and 4) power, control, and women's agency in maternity care. Across studies, trauma-informed care was experienced not as a discrete intervention but as a relational approach embedded in everyday maternity practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women's experiences suggest that trauma-informed principles may contribute to positive care experiences and support psychological safety, autonomy, and relational wellbeing across the perinatal period, when embedded within routine midwifery and maternity practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"10 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13670243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/225227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Trauma-informed care has been increasingly advocated within maternity services as an approach to promote safety, autonomy, and respectful care. However, qualitative evidence exploring how participants experienced trauma-informed care across maternity and midwifery services has not been systematically synthesized. This review therefore aimed to synthesize qualitative evidence on women's experiences of trauma-informed care across maternity services, including midwifery care, during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and ENTREQ guidelines. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) were searched for peer-reviewed qualitative studies published in English. Eligible studies explored women's experiences of trauma-informed, trauma-sensitive, or related care practices within maternity settings. Data were synthesized using thematic synthesis, and methodological quality was appraised using the CASP qualitative checklist.
Results: Fifteen qualitative studies were included. Four analytical themes were identified: 1) creating safety and preventing re-traumatization; 2) respectful communication and informed consent; 3) emotional validation, trust, and relational attunement; and 4) power, control, and women's agency in maternity care. Across studies, trauma-informed care was experienced not as a discrete intervention but as a relational approach embedded in everyday maternity practices.
Conclusions: Women's experiences suggest that trauma-informed principles may contribute to positive care experiences and support psychological safety, autonomy, and relational wellbeing across the perinatal period, when embedded within routine midwifery and maternity practice.
引言:创伤知情护理已越来越多地提倡产妇服务作为一种方法,以促进安全,自主和尊重的照顾。然而,探索参与者如何在产科和助产服务中经历创伤知情护理的定性证据尚未系统地综合。因此,本综述旨在综合定性证据,证明妇女在怀孕、分娩和产后期间接受创伤知情护理的经历,包括助产护理。方法:根据PRISMA 2020和ENTREQ指南进行系统评价。5个电子数据库(PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL和PsycINFO)检索了以英文发表的同行评议的定性研究。符合条件的研究探讨了妇女在产妇环境中创伤知情、创伤敏感或相关护理实践的经历。采用主题综合法对数据进行综合,采用CASP定性检查表对方法质量进行评价。结果:纳入15项定性研究。确定了四个分析主题:1)创造安全和防止再创伤;2)尊重沟通和知情同意;3)情感确认、信任和关系调节;4)产妇保健中的权力、控制和妇女代理。在所有研究中,创伤知情护理不是作为一种离散的干预,而是作为一种嵌入日常产科实践的关系方法。结论:妇女的经验表明,创伤知情原则可能有助于积极的护理经验和支持心理安全,自主性,以及整个围产期的关系健康,当嵌入常规助产和产妇实践。