Direct Effects Multiplicative Inference (DEMI): causal prediction from pairwise clinical relationships, applied to antidepressant response.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Farrokh Alemi, Yili Lin, Hadeel R A Elyazori, Vladimir Franzuela Cardenas, Niloofar Ramezani, Kevin Lybarger
{"title":"Direct Effects Multiplicative Inference (DEMI): causal prediction from pairwise clinical relationships, applied to antidepressant response.","authors":"Farrokh Alemi, Yili Lin, Hadeel R A Elyazori, Vladimir Franzuela Cardenas, Niloofar Ramezani, Kevin Lybarger","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2026.105111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper introduces Direct Effects Multiplicative Inference (DEMI), a causal algorithm that reasons through a medical knowledgebase and predicts clinical outcomes from direct, unmediated effects. This study compares performance of DEMI to logistic regression, a common inference mechanism available for analysis of patient-level tabular data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted 430 million relationships between pairs of medical concepts from the All of Us database. DEMI uses this knowledgebase to predict likelihood of outcomes, in three steps: (1) patient features are temporally ordered using pairwise precedence counts; (2) each feature's total effect on the outcome is recursively decomposed into direct and indirect (mediated) components by working backward through the temporal order; (3) direct effects are aggregated multiplicatively to estimate the odds of outcomes. DEMI uses the distribution of a pair of variables, as reported in the medical knowledgebase. Logistic regression uses patient-level tabular data, which includes the joint distribution of all variables. Performance was assessed using Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DEMI predicted response to 15 antidepressants with a mean AUC of 0.934 (range, 0.512-0.996). Logistic regression achieved similar discrimination (mean AUC, 0.935; range, 0.512-1.000). At α = 0.05, the two methods did not differ significantly. DEMI achieved comparable discrimination using precomputed pairwise statistics without access to the joint distribution of patient features. Under the same variable-selection rule, DEMI could use on average 113 more predictors per task than logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DEMI predicted antidepressant response from a medical knowledgebase as well as logistic regression did from patient-level data. Under its structural assumptions (no unmeasured confounding and correct temporal ordering), it does so by isolating direct, unmediated predictors and excluding effects that operate through intermediate variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"105111"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2026.105111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This paper introduces Direct Effects Multiplicative Inference (DEMI), a causal algorithm that reasons through a medical knowledgebase and predicts clinical outcomes from direct, unmediated effects. This study compares performance of DEMI to logistic regression, a common inference mechanism available for analysis of patient-level tabular data.

Methods: We extracted 430 million relationships between pairs of medical concepts from the All of Us database. DEMI uses this knowledgebase to predict likelihood of outcomes, in three steps: (1) patient features are temporally ordered using pairwise precedence counts; (2) each feature's total effect on the outcome is recursively decomposed into direct and indirect (mediated) components by working backward through the temporal order; (3) direct effects are aggregated multiplicatively to estimate the odds of outcomes. DEMI uses the distribution of a pair of variables, as reported in the medical knowledgebase. Logistic regression uses patient-level tabular data, which includes the joint distribution of all variables. Performance was assessed using Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: DEMI predicted response to 15 antidepressants with a mean AUC of 0.934 (range, 0.512-0.996). Logistic regression achieved similar discrimination (mean AUC, 0.935; range, 0.512-1.000). At α = 0.05, the two methods did not differ significantly. DEMI achieved comparable discrimination using precomputed pairwise statistics without access to the joint distribution of patient features. Under the same variable-selection rule, DEMI could use on average 113 more predictors per task than logistic regression.

Conclusion: DEMI predicted antidepressant response from a medical knowledgebase as well as logistic regression did from patient-level data. Under its structural assumptions (no unmeasured confounding and correct temporal ordering), it does so by isolating direct, unmediated predictors and excluding effects that operate through intermediate variables.

直接效应乘法推断(DEMI):从两两临床关系中进行因果预测,应用于抗抑郁药反应。
目的:本文介绍了直接效应乘法推理(DEMI),这是一种通过医学知识库进行推理并从直接、无中介效应预测临床结果的因果算法。本研究比较了DEMI和逻辑回归的性能,逻辑回归是一种常见的推理机制,可用于分析患者级别的表格数据。方法:我们从All of Us数据库中提取了4.3亿个医学概念对之间的关系。DEMI使用该知识库来预测结果的可能性,分三步:(1)使用成对优先计数对患者特征进行临时排序;(2)每个特征对结果的总影响通过时间顺序递归分解为直接和间接(中介)分量;(3)对直接效应进行乘法汇总,以估计结果的几率。DEMI使用一对变量的分布,如医学知识库中报告的那样。逻辑回归使用患者级别的表格数据,其中包括所有变量的联合分布。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估性能。结果:DEMI预测患者对15种抗抑郁药的反应,平均AUC为0.934(范围0.512 ~ 0.996)。Logistic回归得到了类似的判别(平均AUC为0.935;范围为0.512-1.000)。在α = 0.05时,两种方法无显著差异。DEMI使用预先计算的两两统计实现了可比性的区分,而无需访问患者特征的联合分布。在相同的变量选择规则下,DEMI比逻辑回归在每个任务中平均多使用113个预测因子。结论:DEMI预测抗抑郁反应既可以从医学知识库得到,也可以从患者层面的数据进行逻辑回归。在其结构假设(没有未测量的混淆和正确的时间顺序)下,它通过隔离直接的、无中介的预测因子和排除通过中间变量起作用的影响来做到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Journal of Biomedical Informatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书