Farrokh Alemi, Yili Lin, Hadeel R A Elyazori, Vladimir Franzuela Cardenas, Niloofar Ramezani, Kevin Lybarger
{"title":"Direct Effects Multiplicative Inference (DEMI): causal prediction from pairwise clinical relationships, applied to antidepressant response.","authors":"Farrokh Alemi, Yili Lin, Hadeel R A Elyazori, Vladimir Franzuela Cardenas, Niloofar Ramezani, Kevin Lybarger","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2026.105111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper introduces Direct Effects Multiplicative Inference (DEMI), a causal algorithm that reasons through a medical knowledgebase and predicts clinical outcomes from direct, unmediated effects. This study compares performance of DEMI to logistic regression, a common inference mechanism available for analysis of patient-level tabular data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted 430 million relationships between pairs of medical concepts from the All of Us database. DEMI uses this knowledgebase to predict likelihood of outcomes, in three steps: (1) patient features are temporally ordered using pairwise precedence counts; (2) each feature's total effect on the outcome is recursively decomposed into direct and indirect (mediated) components by working backward through the temporal order; (3) direct effects are aggregated multiplicatively to estimate the odds of outcomes. DEMI uses the distribution of a pair of variables, as reported in the medical knowledgebase. Logistic regression uses patient-level tabular data, which includes the joint distribution of all variables. Performance was assessed using Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DEMI predicted response to 15 antidepressants with a mean AUC of 0.934 (range, 0.512-0.996). Logistic regression achieved similar discrimination (mean AUC, 0.935; range, 0.512-1.000). At α = 0.05, the two methods did not differ significantly. DEMI achieved comparable discrimination using precomputed pairwise statistics without access to the joint distribution of patient features. Under the same variable-selection rule, DEMI could use on average 113 more predictors per task than logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DEMI predicted antidepressant response from a medical knowledgebase as well as logistic regression did from patient-level data. Under its structural assumptions (no unmeasured confounding and correct temporal ordering), it does so by isolating direct, unmediated predictors and excluding effects that operate through intermediate variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"105111"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2026.105111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This paper introduces Direct Effects Multiplicative Inference (DEMI), a causal algorithm that reasons through a medical knowledgebase and predicts clinical outcomes from direct, unmediated effects. This study compares performance of DEMI to logistic regression, a common inference mechanism available for analysis of patient-level tabular data.
Methods: We extracted 430 million relationships between pairs of medical concepts from the All of Us database. DEMI uses this knowledgebase to predict likelihood of outcomes, in three steps: (1) patient features are temporally ordered using pairwise precedence counts; (2) each feature's total effect on the outcome is recursively decomposed into direct and indirect (mediated) components by working backward through the temporal order; (3) direct effects are aggregated multiplicatively to estimate the odds of outcomes. DEMI uses the distribution of a pair of variables, as reported in the medical knowledgebase. Logistic regression uses patient-level tabular data, which includes the joint distribution of all variables. Performance was assessed using Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC).
Results: DEMI predicted response to 15 antidepressants with a mean AUC of 0.934 (range, 0.512-0.996). Logistic regression achieved similar discrimination (mean AUC, 0.935; range, 0.512-1.000). At α = 0.05, the two methods did not differ significantly. DEMI achieved comparable discrimination using precomputed pairwise statistics without access to the joint distribution of patient features. Under the same variable-selection rule, DEMI could use on average 113 more predictors per task than logistic regression.
Conclusion: DEMI predicted antidepressant response from a medical knowledgebase as well as logistic regression did from patient-level data. Under its structural assumptions (no unmeasured confounding and correct temporal ordering), it does so by isolating direct, unmediated predictors and excluding effects that operate through intermediate variables.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.