Interpretable machine learning risk model to predict readmission after coronary artery bypass grafting

IF 2.2
JTCVS open Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-07 DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2026.102050
Rameshbabu Manyam PhD, Conglin Bao MSPH, Yixuan He MSPH, Sheena Warner MS, CRNA, APN, Yanqing Zhang PhD, William Brent Keeling MD
{"title":"Interpretable machine learning risk model to predict readmission after coronary artery bypass grafting","authors":"Rameshbabu Manyam PhD,&nbsp;Conglin Bao MSPH,&nbsp;Yixuan He MSPH,&nbsp;Sheena Warner MS, CRNA, APN,&nbsp;Yanqing Zhang PhD,&nbsp;William Brent Keeling MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2026.102050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Readmission within 30 days of discharge after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) continues to be a concern for patients and health care systems in cardiothoracic care. We developed an interpretable machine learning (ML) risk model to evaluate, understand, and integrate preoperative risk factors to predict 30-day readmission after CABG.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study analyzed a population of patients who had undergone isolated CABG between 2014 and 2023, drawn from a multihospital academic health system. The primary outcome was an index readmission within 30 days of discharge after isolated CABG. The study evaluated 34 patient-specific preoperative variables using the recursive feature elimination with cross-validation method and ML algorithms to evaluate an optimal set of risk factors to predict readmission after CABG. SHapley Additive exPlanations framework was used to understand the contribution of risk factors to model prediction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 8999 patients were identified, and the overall observed 30-day all-cause same system readmission rate was 9.56%, n = 860. The model produced the top 7 preoperative risk factors: hematocrit, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, hemoglobin, creatinine, body mass index, white blood cell count, and platelets. The random forest model demonstrated good performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.74.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study used interpretable ML techniques to identify and interpret an optimal set of preoperative risk factors for 30-day readmission after CABG. The random forest model demonstrated good discrimination in identifying at-risk patients. Individual hospitals can apply the proposed method to their large datasets and assess risk factors that may help identify patients who would experience 30-day readmission after CABG.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 102050"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273626004730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Readmission within 30 days of discharge after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) continues to be a concern for patients and health care systems in cardiothoracic care. We developed an interpretable machine learning (ML) risk model to evaluate, understand, and integrate preoperative risk factors to predict 30-day readmission after CABG.

Methods

The study analyzed a population of patients who had undergone isolated CABG between 2014 and 2023, drawn from a multihospital academic health system. The primary outcome was an index readmission within 30 days of discharge after isolated CABG. The study evaluated 34 patient-specific preoperative variables using the recursive feature elimination with cross-validation method and ML algorithms to evaluate an optimal set of risk factors to predict readmission after CABG. SHapley Additive exPlanations framework was used to understand the contribution of risk factors to model prediction.

Results

A total of 8999 patients were identified, and the overall observed 30-day all-cause same system readmission rate was 9.56%, n = 860. The model produced the top 7 preoperative risk factors: hematocrit, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, hemoglobin, creatinine, body mass index, white blood cell count, and platelets. The random forest model demonstrated good performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.74.

Conclusions

This study used interpretable ML techniques to identify and interpret an optimal set of preoperative risk factors for 30-day readmission after CABG. The random forest model demonstrated good discrimination in identifying at-risk patients. Individual hospitals can apply the proposed method to their large datasets and assess risk factors that may help identify patients who would experience 30-day readmission after CABG.
可解释的机器学习风险模型预测冠状动脉搭桥术后再入院
目的冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)术后出院30天内入院一直是患者和医疗保健系统关注的问题。我们开发了一个可解释的机器学习(ML)风险模型来评估、理解和整合术前风险因素,以预测CABG后30天的再入院情况。该研究分析了2014年至2023年间接受孤立性冠脉搭桥的患者群体,这些患者来自多医院学术卫生系统。主要结果是孤立性冠状动脉搭桥后出院30天内的再入院指数。该研究使用递归特征消除交叉验证方法和ML算法评估34个患者特异性术前变量,以评估一组预测CABG后再入院的最佳危险因素。采用SHapley加性解释框架来理解风险因素对模型预测的贡献。结果共发现8999例患者,观察到的30天全因同系统再入院率为9.56% (n = 860)。该模型产生了前7个术前危险因素:红细胞压积、终末期肝病模型评分、血红蛋白、肌酐、体重指数、白细胞计数和血小板。随机森林模型表现出良好的性能,其在接收者工作特征曲线下的面积为0.74。结论:本研究使用可解释的ML技术来识别和解释CABG后30天再入院的一组最佳术前危险因素。随机森林模型在识别高危患者方面表现出良好的辨别能力。个别医院可以将所提出的方法应用于其大型数据集,并评估可能有助于识别CABG后30天再入院的患者的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书