Comparative Analysis of Genotoxic Modes of Action and Underlying Molecular Mechanisms of Four Classes of Unregulated DBPs in Human Uroepithelial (SV-HUC-1) Cells

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Chemical Research in Toxicology Pub Date : 2026-10-19 Epub Date: 2026-09-24 DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6c00291
Yingnan Han, Shuo Zhang, Xiaohong Zhou, Mei Ma
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Genotoxic Modes of Action and Underlying Molecular Mechanisms of Four Classes of Unregulated DBPs in Human Uroepithelial (SV-HUC-1) Cells","authors":"Yingnan Han,&nbsp;Shuo Zhang,&nbsp;Xiaohong Zhou,&nbsp;Mei Ma","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6c00291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increasing evidence suggests that\r\nthe contribution of\r\nunregulated\r\ndisinfection by-products (UR-DBPs) to the overall toxicity of disinfected\r\nwater is underestimated. However, the molecular mechanisms by which\r\nthey promote bladder carcinogenesis remain largely unexplored. Using\r\nthe nontumorigenic human uroepithelial cell line SV-HUC-1, we sought\r\nto elucidate the potential genotoxic mechanisms underlying the bladder\r\ncancer risk associated with four classes of typical UR-DBPs: haloacetonitriles\r\n(HANs), haloacetamides (HAMs), halobenzoquinones (HBQs), and halobenzoquinone\r\nimines (HQCs). Genotoxicity was evaluated by the SOS/<em>umu</em> assay and the micronucleus assay. Only three of the eight UR-DBPs\r\ngave positive SOS/<em>umu</em> responses. However, all tested\r\nUR-DBPs showed clear cytotoxicity and micronucleus effects, with a\r\nconsistent toxicity order: HANs &gt; HAMs &gt; HBQs and HQCs. Principal\r\ncomponent analysis (PCA) of transcriptomic data indicated that the\r\neight UR-DBPs may act through two distinct modes of action (MOAs).\r\nGene set variation analysis (GSVA) further revealed that HANs and\r\nHAMs activated DNA repair pathways, including base excision repair\r\n(BER) and nonhomologous end-joining for double-strand break repair\r\n(DSBR-NHEJ), while HBQs and HQCs suppressed DNA damage repair pathways\r\nor the regulatory pathways involved in nucleotide excision repair\r\n(NER), mismatch repair (MMR), and double-strand break repair (DSBR).\r\nWestern blotting confirmed that HBQs and HQCs significantly downregulated\r\nproteins critical for DNA damage repair regulation. This is possibly\r\nattributable to their stronger protein-binding capacities relative\r\nto other UR-DBPs. Collectively, these findings argue that the impairment\r\nof DNA repair regulation constitutes a distinct genotoxic mechanism\r\nthat should be integrated into DBP risk evaluation alongside direct\r\nDNA damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":"39 10","pages":"2087–2098"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6c00291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that the contribution of unregulated disinfection by-products (UR-DBPs) to the overall toxicity of disinfected water is underestimated. However, the molecular mechanisms by which they promote bladder carcinogenesis remain largely unexplored. Using the nontumorigenic human uroepithelial cell line SV-HUC-1, we sought to elucidate the potential genotoxic mechanisms underlying the bladder cancer risk associated with four classes of typical UR-DBPs: haloacetonitriles (HANs), haloacetamides (HAMs), halobenzoquinones (HBQs), and halobenzoquinone imines (HQCs). Genotoxicity was evaluated by the SOS/umu assay and the micronucleus assay. Only three of the eight UR-DBPs gave positive SOS/umu responses. However, all tested UR-DBPs showed clear cytotoxicity and micronucleus effects, with a consistent toxicity order: HANs > HAMs > HBQs and HQCs. Principal component analysis (PCA) of transcriptomic data indicated that the eight UR-DBPs may act through two distinct modes of action (MOAs). Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) further revealed that HANs and HAMs activated DNA repair pathways, including base excision repair (BER) and nonhomologous end-joining for double-strand break repair (DSBR-NHEJ), while HBQs and HQCs suppressed DNA damage repair pathways or the regulatory pathways involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), and double-strand break repair (DSBR). Western blotting confirmed that HBQs and HQCs significantly downregulated proteins critical for DNA damage repair regulation. This is possibly attributable to their stronger protein-binding capacities relative to other UR-DBPs. Collectively, these findings argue that the impairment of DNA repair regulation constitutes a distinct genotoxic mechanism that should be integrated into DBP risk evaluation alongside direct DNA damage.

四类不调节DBPs在人尿上皮细胞(SV-HUC-1)中的基因毒性作用方式和潜在分子机制的比较分析
越来越多的证据表明,不受管制的消毒副产物(UR-DBPs)对消毒水总体毒性的贡献被低估了。然而,它们促进膀胱癌发生的分子机制在很大程度上仍未被探索。利用非致瘤性人尿上皮细胞系SV-HUC-1,我们试图阐明与四类典型UR-DBPs相关的膀胱癌风险的潜在遗传毒性机制:卤代乙腈(HANs)、卤代乙酰胺(HAMs)、卤代苯醌(HBQs)和卤代苯醌亚胺(hqc)。采用SOS/umu法和微核法评价遗传毒性。8个ur - dbp中只有3个给出了积极的SOS/umu反应。然而,所有测试的durd - dbps均表现出明显的细胞毒性和微核效应,其毒性顺序一致:HANs >; HAMs >; hbq和hqc。转录组学数据的主成分分析(PCA)表明,8种ur - dbp可能通过两种不同的作用模式(MOAs)起作用。基因集变异分析(GSVA)进一步发现,HANs和hams激活了DNA修复途径,包括碱基切除修复(BER)和非同源末端连接双链断裂修复(DSBR- nhej),而HBQs和HQCs则抑制DNA损伤修复途径或涉及核苷酸切除修复(NER)、错配修复(MMR)和双链断裂修复(DSBR)的调控途径。Western blotting证实hbq和hqc显著下调DNA损伤修复调控的关键蛋白。这可能是由于它们相对于其他ur - dbp具有更强的蛋白质结合能力。总的来说,这些发现表明DNA修复调节的损伤构成了一种独特的遗传毒性机制,应该与直接DNA损伤一起纳入DBP风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书