Comparative Analysis of Genotoxic Modes of Action and Underlying Molecular Mechanisms of Four Classes of Unregulated DBPs in Human Uroepithelial (SV-HUC-1) Cells
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Genotoxic Modes of Action and Underlying Molecular Mechanisms of Four Classes of Unregulated DBPs in Human Uroepithelial (SV-HUC-1) Cells","authors":"Yingnan Han, Shuo Zhang, Xiaohong Zhou, Mei Ma","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6c00291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increasing evidence suggests that\r\nthe contribution of\r\nunregulated\r\ndisinfection by-products (UR-DBPs) to the overall toxicity of disinfected\r\nwater is underestimated. However, the molecular mechanisms by which\r\nthey promote bladder carcinogenesis remain largely unexplored. Using\r\nthe nontumorigenic human uroepithelial cell line SV-HUC-1, we sought\r\nto elucidate the potential genotoxic mechanisms underlying the bladder\r\ncancer risk associated with four classes of typical UR-DBPs: haloacetonitriles\r\n(HANs), haloacetamides (HAMs), halobenzoquinones (HBQs), and halobenzoquinone\r\nimines (HQCs). Genotoxicity was evaluated by the SOS/<em>umu</em> assay and the micronucleus assay. Only three of the eight UR-DBPs\r\ngave positive SOS/<em>umu</em> responses. However, all tested\r\nUR-DBPs showed clear cytotoxicity and micronucleus effects, with a\r\nconsistent toxicity order: HANs > HAMs > HBQs and HQCs. Principal\r\ncomponent analysis (PCA) of transcriptomic data indicated that the\r\neight UR-DBPs may act through two distinct modes of action (MOAs).\r\nGene set variation analysis (GSVA) further revealed that HANs and\r\nHAMs activated DNA repair pathways, including base excision repair\r\n(BER) and nonhomologous end-joining for double-strand break repair\r\n(DSBR-NHEJ), while HBQs and HQCs suppressed DNA damage repair pathways\r\nor the regulatory pathways involved in nucleotide excision repair\r\n(NER), mismatch repair (MMR), and double-strand break repair (DSBR).\r\nWestern blotting confirmed that HBQs and HQCs significantly downregulated\r\nproteins critical for DNA damage repair regulation. This is possibly\r\nattributable to their stronger protein-binding capacities relative\r\nto other UR-DBPs. Collectively, these findings argue that the impairment\r\nof DNA repair regulation constitutes a distinct genotoxic mechanism\r\nthat should be integrated into DBP risk evaluation alongside direct\r\nDNA damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":"39 10","pages":"2087–2098"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6c00291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that
the contribution of
unregulated
disinfection by-products (UR-DBPs) to the overall toxicity of disinfected
water is underestimated. However, the molecular mechanisms by which
they promote bladder carcinogenesis remain largely unexplored. Using
the nontumorigenic human uroepithelial cell line SV-HUC-1, we sought
to elucidate the potential genotoxic mechanisms underlying the bladder
cancer risk associated with four classes of typical UR-DBPs: haloacetonitriles
(HANs), haloacetamides (HAMs), halobenzoquinones (HBQs), and halobenzoquinone
imines (HQCs). Genotoxicity was evaluated by the SOS/umu assay and the micronucleus assay. Only three of the eight UR-DBPs
gave positive SOS/umu responses. However, all tested
UR-DBPs showed clear cytotoxicity and micronucleus effects, with a
consistent toxicity order: HANs > HAMs > HBQs and HQCs. Principal
component analysis (PCA) of transcriptomic data indicated that the
eight UR-DBPs may act through two distinct modes of action (MOAs).
Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) further revealed that HANs and
HAMs activated DNA repair pathways, including base excision repair
(BER) and nonhomologous end-joining for double-strand break repair
(DSBR-NHEJ), while HBQs and HQCs suppressed DNA damage repair pathways
or the regulatory pathways involved in nucleotide excision repair
(NER), mismatch repair (MMR), and double-strand break repair (DSBR).
Western blotting confirmed that HBQs and HQCs significantly downregulated
proteins critical for DNA damage repair regulation. This is possibly
attributable to their stronger protein-binding capacities relative
to other UR-DBPs. Collectively, these findings argue that the impairment
of DNA repair regulation constitutes a distinct genotoxic mechanism
that should be integrated into DBP risk evaluation alongside direct
DNA damage.
期刊介绍:
Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.