Implementation and effectiveness of a smartphone app targeted at improving physicians adherence to antimicrobial treatment guidelines

IF 18 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Minyahil Tadesse Boltena,Mirkuzie Woldie,Alemseged Abdissa,Ziad El-Khatib,Yibeltal Siraneh,Abraham Sahilemichael Kebede,Wendosen Shewarega,Zelalem Tadesse,Wondwossen Amanuel,Getachew Tesfaye Beyene,Kassa Haile,Sudhakar Morankar
{"title":"Implementation and effectiveness of a smartphone app targeted at improving physicians adherence to antimicrobial treatment guidelines","authors":"Minyahil Tadesse Boltena,Mirkuzie Woldie,Alemseged Abdissa,Ziad El-Khatib,Yibeltal Siraneh,Abraham Sahilemichael Kebede,Wendosen Shewarega,Zelalem Tadesse,Wondwossen Amanuel,Getachew Tesfaye Beyene,Kassa Haile,Sudhakar Morankar","doi":"10.1038/s41746-026-03401-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The effectiveness of mHealth interventions for improving antimicrobial guideline adherence remains insufficiently understood in resource-limited settings. This study evaluated a context-adapted smartphone Standard Treatment Guideline (STG) app designed to improve physicians’ adherence to antimicrobial treatment guidelines in Ethiopia. A type 1 hybrid effectiveness–implementation cluster-randomized trial was conducted in 20 hospitals randomized to a smartphone app plus training or paper-based guidelines and retrospectively registered (PACTR202504495116733). The primary outcome was guideline-adherent prescribing, defined as correct antibiotic selection, dose, frequency, and duration when treatment was indicated, or appropriately documented non-prescribing when antibiotics were not indicated across 1433 patient charts. Secondary outcomes included overall antibiotic use and broad-spectrum antibiotic use. Guideline adherence improved by 26.7 percentage points in crude difference-in-differences analysis, and the adjusted intervention-by-endline effect showed higher odds of guideline-adherent prescribing (aOR 3.89; 95% CI: 1.96–7.73). Overall, antibiotic use declined from 96.9% to 82.2% in the intervention arm. In a post-hoc sensitivity analysis using all eligible charts, broad-spectrum antibiotic use declined from 83.9 to 57.5%. These findings support the potential value of a multicomponent intervention combining an offline STG app with training and implementation support for improving guideline-concordant antimicrobial prescribing; however, the independent contribution of the mobile application cannot be determined.","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"406 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03401-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The effectiveness of mHealth interventions for improving antimicrobial guideline adherence remains insufficiently understood in resource-limited settings. This study evaluated a context-adapted smartphone Standard Treatment Guideline (STG) app designed to improve physicians’ adherence to antimicrobial treatment guidelines in Ethiopia. A type 1 hybrid effectiveness–implementation cluster-randomized trial was conducted in 20 hospitals randomized to a smartphone app plus training or paper-based guidelines and retrospectively registered (PACTR202504495116733). The primary outcome was guideline-adherent prescribing, defined as correct antibiotic selection, dose, frequency, and duration when treatment was indicated, or appropriately documented non-prescribing when antibiotics were not indicated across 1433 patient charts. Secondary outcomes included overall antibiotic use and broad-spectrum antibiotic use. Guideline adherence improved by 26.7 percentage points in crude difference-in-differences analysis, and the adjusted intervention-by-endline effect showed higher odds of guideline-adherent prescribing (aOR 3.89; 95% CI: 1.96–7.73). Overall, antibiotic use declined from 96.9% to 82.2% in the intervention arm. In a post-hoc sensitivity analysis using all eligible charts, broad-spectrum antibiotic use declined from 83.9 to 57.5%. These findings support the potential value of a multicomponent intervention combining an offline STG app with training and implementation support for improving guideline-concordant antimicrobial prescribing; however, the independent contribution of the mobile application cannot be determined.
智能手机应用程序的实施和有效性,旨在提高医生对抗菌药物治疗指南的依从性
在资源有限的情况下,移动健康干预措施对提高抗菌素指南依从性的有效性仍未得到充分了解。本研究评估了一款基于情境的智能手机标准治疗指南(STG)应用程序,该应用程序旨在提高埃塞俄比亚医生对抗菌治疗指南的依从性。在20家医院进行了1型混合有效性-实施集群-随机试验,随机分配到智能手机应用程序加培训或基于纸张的指南,并回顾性注册(pactr2012504495116733)。主要结果是遵循指南的处方,定义为指征治疗时正确的抗生素选择、剂量、频率和持续时间,或在1433例患者图表中,当不指征抗生素时,适当记录非处方。次要结局包括总体抗生素使用和广谱抗生素使用。在粗差中差分析中,指南依从性提高了26.7个百分点,调整后的干预终点效应显示,指南依从性处方的几率更高(aOR 3.89; 95% CI: 1.96-7.73)。总体而言,干预组的抗生素使用率从96.9%下降到82.2%。在使用所有合格图表的事后敏感性分析中,广谱抗生素的使用从83.9%下降到57.5%。这些发现支持将离线STG应用程序与培训和实施支持相结合的多组分干预措施在改善符合指南的抗菌药物处方方面的潜在价值;但是,无法确定移动应用程序的独立贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书