Physiotherapy contact in the emergency department and hospital re‑presentation rates: A systematic review and meta‑regression.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
J L Citroen, M G King, E C Bell, D Crompton, A Semciw
{"title":"Physiotherapy contact in the emergency department and hospital re‑presentation rates: A systematic review and meta‑regression.","authors":"J L Citroen, M G King, E C Bell, D Crompton, A Semciw","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2026.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if physiotherapy input in the Emergency Department (ED) impacts patient re-presentation rates.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three electronic databases (Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid) and CINAHL) were searched from inception to November 16th, 2025. Included articles were peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials, observational studies or audits evaluating re-presentation rates for physiotherapy intervention in ED compared to an ED physician. Risk of bias was assessed using The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to assess level of evidence for the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review. Overall pooled results from ten studies included in the 30-day re-presentation meta-analysis provided low-quality evidence of no difference in the risk of re-presentation following physiotherapy intervention compared with ED physician management (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69-1.55). Subgroup analysis by presenting condition demonstrated a lower risk of 30-day re-presentation following physiotherapy intervention for fall presentations (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.59-0.74), with no differences observed for musculoskeletal presentations (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.61-2.22) or general ED presentations (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.66-1.33) compared with ED physician management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Irrespective of included condition, physiotherapy intervention in ED does not increase the risk of re-presentation within 30 days of initial presentation, and potentially reduces re-presentation rates for fall patients. Further research is required to determine the most effective component of physiotherapy intervention to reduce re-presentation rates and its impact on ED crowding.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2026.10.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if physiotherapy input in the Emergency Department (ED) impacts patient re-presentation rates.

Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Methods: Three electronic databases (Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid) and CINAHL) were searched from inception to November 16th, 2025. Included articles were peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials, observational studies or audits evaluating re-presentation rates for physiotherapy intervention in ED compared to an ED physician. Risk of bias was assessed using The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to assess level of evidence for the meta-analysis.

Results: Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review. Overall pooled results from ten studies included in the 30-day re-presentation meta-analysis provided low-quality evidence of no difference in the risk of re-presentation following physiotherapy intervention compared with ED physician management (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69-1.55). Subgroup analysis by presenting condition demonstrated a lower risk of 30-day re-presentation following physiotherapy intervention for fall presentations (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.59-0.74), with no differences observed for musculoskeletal presentations (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.61-2.22) or general ED presentations (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.66-1.33) compared with ED physician management.

Conclusion: Irrespective of included condition, physiotherapy intervention in ED does not increase the risk of re-presentation within 30 days of initial presentation, and potentially reduces re-presentation rates for fall patients. Further research is required to determine the most effective component of physiotherapy intervention to reduce re-presentation rates and its impact on ED crowding.

急诊科物理治疗接触和医院代表率:系统回顾和meta回归。
目的:探讨急诊科(ED)的物理治疗投入是否会影响患者的再就诊率。设计:采用荟萃分析和荟萃回归进行系统评价。方法:检索自建库至2025年11月16日的Medline (Ovid)、EMBASE (Ovid)和CINAHL三个电子数据库。纳入的文章是同行评议的随机对照试验、观察性研究或审计,评估了与ED医生相比,物理治疗干预在ED中的再呈现率。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险,使用建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)工具评估meta分析的证据水平。结果:16项研究被纳入系统评价。纳入30天再发病荟萃分析的10项研究的总体汇总结果提供了低质量的证据,表明物理治疗干预后再发病的风险与ED医生管理相比没有差异(RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69-1.55)。根据病情进行的亚组分析显示,物理治疗干预后30天再次出现跌倒症状的风险较低(RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.59-0.74),肌肉骨骼症状(RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.61-2.22)或普通ED症状(RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.66-1.33)与ED医生治疗相比无差异。结论:无论纳入的条件如何,ED的物理治疗干预不会增加初次发病后30天内再发病的风险,并可能降低跌倒患者的再发病率。需要进一步的研究来确定物理治疗干预的最有效组成部分,以减少再出现率及其对ED拥挤的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书