Prognostic nomogram for early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a SEER analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yi-Kai Kao, Pin-Chun Chen, Po-Wen Yang, Chia-Hung Chen, Chih-I Chen
{"title":"Prognostic nomogram for early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a SEER analysis.","authors":"Yi-Kai Kao, Pin-Chun Chen, Po-Wen Yang, Chia-Hung Chen, Chih-I Chen","doi":"10.1007/s13304-026-02890-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective and rationale: </strong>Early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer presents unique challenges in treatment and prognosis. This study aimed to develop and validate a prognostic nomogram for patients aged 18-50 years with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, addressing the lack of tailored prognostic tools for this growing patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we analyzed 2,853 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy between 2010 and 2020. Patients were divided into training (n = 1,990) and validation (n = 863) cohorts. Cox proportional hazard regression models identified prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Nomograms were constructed and validated using Harrell's C-index and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Independent predictors of poor OS and CSS included male sex, unmarried status (particularly divorced/separated/widowed), non-Hispanic black and American Indian/Alaskan native races, advanced T stage, increased positive regional nodes, and positive carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The nomogram demonstrated good discriminative ability in the validation cohort, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.767 and 0.742 for 3-year OS and CSS, respectively, and 0.705 and 0.697 for 5-year OS and CSS, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The developed nomogram and identified prognostic factors provide valuable tools for individualized risk stratification and treatment optimization in young patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. These findings can aid in clinical decision-making and patient counseling. However, further external validation and prospective evaluations are necessary to confirm the clinical utility of this prognostic model in diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02890-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective and rationale: Early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer presents unique challenges in treatment and prognosis. This study aimed to develop and validate a prognostic nomogram for patients aged 18-50 years with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, addressing the lack of tailored prognostic tools for this growing patient population.

Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we analyzed 2,853 patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy between 2010 and 2020. Patients were divided into training (n = 1,990) and validation (n = 863) cohorts. Cox proportional hazard regression models identified prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Nomograms were constructed and validated using Harrell's C-index and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: Independent predictors of poor OS and CSS included male sex, unmarried status (particularly divorced/separated/widowed), non-Hispanic black and American Indian/Alaskan native races, advanced T stage, increased positive regional nodes, and positive carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The nomogram demonstrated good discriminative ability in the validation cohort, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.767 and 0.742 for 3-year OS and CSS, respectively, and 0.705 and 0.697 for 5-year OS and CSS, respectively.

Conclusions: The developed nomogram and identified prognostic factors provide valuable tools for individualized risk stratification and treatment optimization in young patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. These findings can aid in clinical decision-making and patient counseling. However, further external validation and prospective evaluations are necessary to confirm the clinical utility of this prognostic model in diverse healthcare settings.

经新辅助放化疗治疗的早发局部晚期直肠癌的预后图:SEER分析。
目的和理由:早发局部晚期直肠癌在治疗和预后方面提出了独特的挑战。本研究旨在开发和验证18-50岁局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗患者的预后图,以解决这一不断增长的患者群体缺乏量身定制的预后工具的问题。方法:使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,我们分析了2010年至2020年期间接受新辅助放化疗的2,853例患者。患者被分为训练组(n = 1990)和验证组(n = 863)。Cox比例风险回归模型确定了总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)的预后因素。采用Harrell’s c -指数和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析构建nomogram并进行验证。结果:OS和CSS差的独立预测因素包括男性、未婚状态(特别是离婚/分居/丧偶)、非西班牙裔黑人和美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加土著种族、T期晚期、区域淋巴结阳性增加和癌胚抗原(CEA)阳性。nomogram在验证队列中具有较好的判别能力,3年OS和CSS的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.767和0.742,5年OS和CSS的AUC分别为0.705和0.697。结论:发展的nomogram和确定的预后因素为局部晚期年轻直肠癌患者的个体化风险分层和治疗优化提供了有价值的工具。这些发现有助于临床决策和患者咨询。然而,需要进一步的外部验证和前瞻性评估来确认该预后模型在不同医疗保健环境中的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书