{"title":"Balancing Personal and Professional Obligations Across the Transitions of Care.","authors":"Ellen Fink-Samnick","doi":"10.1097/NCM.0000000000000908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objectives: </strong>To illustrate a critical paradox: health care professionals, and especially case managers, possess knowledge of regulatory requirements, care processes, and available resources that enable them to navigate complex systems more effectively than patients and families without this expertise. Yet, patients should not need a health care insider, professional credentials, or personal relationships within a health system to receive comprehensive, person-centered case management.</p><p><strong>Primary practice settings: </strong>Across all settings.</p><p><strong>Findings/conclusions: </strong>The lived experience illustrates a critical paradox: health care professionals, and especially case managers, possess knowledge of regulatory requirements, care processes, and available resources that enable them to navigate complex systems more effectively than patients and families without this expertise. Yet, patients should not need a health care insider, professional credentials, or personal relationships within a health system to receive comprehensive, person-centered case management.</p><p><strong>Implications for case management practice: </strong>Case managers must recognize that effective care coordination extends beyond completing assessments, arranging services, and facilitating discharge. Professional practice requires sustained attention to the patient's voice, dignity, preferences, psychosocial needs, and understanding of the care plan across every transition. Standardized assessments and regulatory requirements provide an important foundation but are not a substitute for individualized engagement and professional judgment. The standard for case management excellence should be a system that consistently provides informed participation, individualized planning, advocacy, coordination, and respectful communication to every patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":45015,"journal":{"name":"Professional Case Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose/objectives: To illustrate a critical paradox: health care professionals, and especially case managers, possess knowledge of regulatory requirements, care processes, and available resources that enable them to navigate complex systems more effectively than patients and families without this expertise. Yet, patients should not need a health care insider, professional credentials, or personal relationships within a health system to receive comprehensive, person-centered case management.
Primary practice settings: Across all settings.
Findings/conclusions: The lived experience illustrates a critical paradox: health care professionals, and especially case managers, possess knowledge of regulatory requirements, care processes, and available resources that enable them to navigate complex systems more effectively than patients and families without this expertise. Yet, patients should not need a health care insider, professional credentials, or personal relationships within a health system to receive comprehensive, person-centered case management.
Implications for case management practice: Case managers must recognize that effective care coordination extends beyond completing assessments, arranging services, and facilitating discharge. Professional practice requires sustained attention to the patient's voice, dignity, preferences, psychosocial needs, and understanding of the care plan across every transition. Standardized assessments and regulatory requirements provide an important foundation but are not a substitute for individualized engagement and professional judgment. The standard for case management excellence should be a system that consistently provides informed participation, individualized planning, advocacy, coordination, and respectful communication to every patient.
期刊介绍:
Professional Case Management: The Leader in Evidence-Based Practice is a peer-reviewed, contemporary journal that crosses all case management settings. The Journal features best practices and industry benchmarks for the professional case manager and also features hands-on information for case managers new to the specialty. Articles focus on the coordination of services, management of payer issues, population- and disease-specific aspects of patient care, efficient use of resources, improving the quality of care/patient safety, data and outcomes analysis, and patient advocacy. The Journal provides practical, hands-on information for day-to-day activities, as well as cutting-edge research.