Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction in patients with abdominal surgical history: what makes it technically challenging?

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Kana Ishikawa, Siyuan Yao, Taiki Omura, Kanon Hoshimaru, Tatsuhi Ushikubo, Takashi Takashima, Takashi Kumode, Shinichi Hosokawa, Teppei Murakami, Sanae Nakajima
{"title":"Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction in patients with abdominal surgical history: what makes it technically challenging?","authors":"Kana Ishikawa, Siyuan Yao, Taiki Omura, Kanon Hoshimaru, Tatsuhi Ushikubo, Takashi Takashima, Takashi Kumode, Shinichi Hosokawa, Teppei Murakami, Sanae Nakajima","doi":"10.1007/s00464-026-13514-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic adhesiolysis (LA) has increasingly been adopted as a treatment option for small bowel obstruction (SBO). However, repeated operations and the resulting dense adhesions can make adhesiolysis technically challenging. Although LA generally yields better short-term outcomes than open adhesiolysis (OA), its benefits in patients with prior abdominal surgery, who often present with complex adhesions, remain unclear. Moreover, the pathophysiological characteristics and surgical pitfalls in such patients have not been sufficiently discussed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 373 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for adhesive SBO between 2009 and 2024. Particularly among the 301 patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery, postoperative outcomes between LA and OA were compared, and risk factors for technically difficult cases and complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The impact of prior abdominal surgery was more pronounced in patients treated with LA than with OA. In the propensity score-matched cohort, LA resulted in faster bowel recovery, fewer complications, and shorter hospitalization compared with OA (p < 0.05). Conversion to OA occurred in 15.8% of LA-attempted cases, mainly due to dense adhesions (68.4%), and was associated with complication rates comparable to those of OA. Higher BMI (odds ratio (OR): 1.15, p = 0.003) and prior malignancy surgery (OR: 2.29, p = 0.014) independently predicted dense adhesions, whereas a 15-min increase in operative time (OR: 1.40, p < 0.001) was a significant risk factor for complications. As the operative time of LA increased, complication rates rose markedly, approaching those of OA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LA completion demonstrates overall advantages even in patients with prior abdominal surgery; however, in technically demanding cases with prolonged operative times or the need for conversion, complication rates approximate those of OA, warranting prudent case selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13514-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis (LA) has increasingly been adopted as a treatment option for small bowel obstruction (SBO). However, repeated operations and the resulting dense adhesions can make adhesiolysis technically challenging. Although LA generally yields better short-term outcomes than open adhesiolysis (OA), its benefits in patients with prior abdominal surgery, who often present with complex adhesions, remain unclear. Moreover, the pathophysiological characteristics and surgical pitfalls in such patients have not been sufficiently discussed.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 373 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for adhesive SBO between 2009 and 2024. Particularly among the 301 patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery, postoperative outcomes between LA and OA were compared, and risk factors for technically difficult cases and complications were analyzed.

Results: The impact of prior abdominal surgery was more pronounced in patients treated with LA than with OA. In the propensity score-matched cohort, LA resulted in faster bowel recovery, fewer complications, and shorter hospitalization compared with OA (p < 0.05). Conversion to OA occurred in 15.8% of LA-attempted cases, mainly due to dense adhesions (68.4%), and was associated with complication rates comparable to those of OA. Higher BMI (odds ratio (OR): 1.15, p = 0.003) and prior malignancy surgery (OR: 2.29, p = 0.014) independently predicted dense adhesions, whereas a 15-min increase in operative time (OR: 1.40, p < 0.001) was a significant risk factor for complications. As the operative time of LA increased, complication rates rose markedly, approaching those of OA.

Conclusions: LA completion demonstrates overall advantages even in patients with prior abdominal surgery; however, in technically demanding cases with prolonged operative times or the need for conversion, complication rates approximate those of OA, warranting prudent case selection.

有腹部手术史的小肠梗阻患者的腹腔镜粘连松解术:是什么使其在技术上具有挑战性?
背景:腹腔镜粘连松解术(LA)越来越多地被用作治疗小肠梗阻(SBO)的一种选择。然而,重复的操作和由此产生的致密粘连使粘连溶解在技术上具有挑战性。虽然LA通常比开放粘连松解术(OA)具有更好的短期疗效,但其对既往腹部手术患者的益处尚不清楚,这些患者通常存在复杂的粘连。此外,这些患者的病理生理特征和手术陷阱尚未得到充分的讨论。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2009年至2024年间连续373例接受粘连性SBO手术的患者。特别在301例既往有腹部手术史的患者中,我们比较了LA和OA的术后结局,并分析了技术困难病例和并发症的危险因素。结果:既往腹部手术对LA患者的影响比OA患者更明显。在倾向评分匹配的队列中,与OA相比,LA的肠道恢复更快,并发症更少,住院时间更短(p结论:即使在既往腹部手术的患者中,LA完成也显示出总体优势;然而,在技术要求较高的病例中,手术时间延长或需要转换,并发症发生率与OA相近,需要谨慎选择病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书