Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for post-chemotherapy nodal mass in testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumours: Initial experience, insights into patient selection and point of technique.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Kevin Arulraj, Sridhar Panaiyadiyan, Brusabhanu Nayak
{"title":"Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for post-chemotherapy nodal mass in testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumours: Initial experience, insights into patient selection and point of technique.","authors":"Kevin Arulraj, Sridhar Panaiyadiyan, Brusabhanu Nayak","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_317_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) for post-chemotherapy residual retroperitoneal masses in patients with testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumours. Open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) is associated with long skin incisions, increased post-operative pain and prolonged recovery. R-RPLND is a minimally invasive alternative, offering improved visualisation and precision, particularly in proximity to major vessels.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent R-RPLND at our centre between January 2023 and January 2026 was conducted. Patient selection was based on imaging and technical feasibility following informed consent. Procedures were performed by a high-volume robotic surgeon using the da Vinci Xi system. Demographic, perioperative and pathological outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients underwent R-RPLND during the study period. The median age was 27 years. Embryonal carcinoma was the predominant histology on orchiectomy (70%). Sixty percent of patients had clinical N3 disease. Post-chemotherapy serum tumour markers normalised in all but two patients who required second-line chemotherapy. The mean residual nodal mass size was 4 ± 1.58 cm. The median console time and estimated blood loss were 240 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 240-310) and 220 ml (IQR: 90-300), respectively. Three patients required open conversion. Histopathology revealed necrosis in 40%, teratoma in 40% and viable tumour in 20% of the cases. There were no recurrences at a median follow-up of 20 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>R-RPLND is a safe and feasible alternative to O-RPLND in carefully selected patients. Optimal outcomes depend on meticulous pre-operative planning, patient selection and surgical expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_317_26","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate the outcomes of robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) for post-chemotherapy residual retroperitoneal masses in patients with testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumours. Open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) is associated with long skin incisions, increased post-operative pain and prolonged recovery. R-RPLND is a minimally invasive alternative, offering improved visualisation and precision, particularly in proximity to major vessels.

Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent R-RPLND at our centre between January 2023 and January 2026 was conducted. Patient selection was based on imaging and technical feasibility following informed consent. Procedures were performed by a high-volume robotic surgeon using the da Vinci Xi system. Demographic, perioperative and pathological outcomes were evaluated.

Results: Ten patients underwent R-RPLND during the study period. The median age was 27 years. Embryonal carcinoma was the predominant histology on orchiectomy (70%). Sixty percent of patients had clinical N3 disease. Post-chemotherapy serum tumour markers normalised in all but two patients who required second-line chemotherapy. The mean residual nodal mass size was 4 ± 1.58 cm. The median console time and estimated blood loss were 240 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 240-310) and 220 ml (IQR: 90-300), respectively. Three patients required open conversion. Histopathology revealed necrosis in 40%, teratoma in 40% and viable tumour in 20% of the cases. There were no recurrences at a median follow-up of 20 months.

Conclusion: R-RPLND is a safe and feasible alternative to O-RPLND in carefully selected patients. Optimal outcomes depend on meticulous pre-operative planning, patient selection and surgical expertise.

机器人腹膜后淋巴结清扫治疗睾丸非半瘤性生殖细胞肿瘤化疗后淋巴结肿物:初步经验,对患者选择和技术要点的见解。
前言:评价机器人腹膜后淋巴结清扫(R-RPLND)治疗睾丸非半瘤性生殖细胞肿瘤患者化疗后腹膜后残余肿块的效果。开放式腹膜后淋巴结清扫(O-RPLND)与皮肤切口长、术后疼痛增加和恢复时间延长有关。R-RPLND是一种微创替代方案,提供了更好的可视化和精度,特别是在靠近主要血管的地方。患者和方法:对2023年1月至2026年1月期间在本中心接受R-RPLND治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。患者的选择基于知情同意后的影像学和技术可行性。手术由大容量机器人外科医生使用达芬奇Xi系统进行。评估人口统计学、围手术期和病理结果。结果:10例患者在研究期间接受了R-RPLND。中位年龄为27岁。胚胎癌是睾丸切除术的主要组织学(70%)。60%的患者患有临床N3疾病。化疗后血清肿瘤标志物除两名需要二线化疗的患者外均恢复正常。平均剩余淋巴结大小为4±1.58 cm。中位镇静时间和估计失血量分别为240 min(四分位数间距[IQR]: 240-310)和220 ml (IQR: 90-300)。3例患者需要开放转换。组织病理学显示坏死占40%,畸胎瘤占40%,活肿瘤占20%。中位随访20个月无复发。结论:在精心挑选的患者中,R-RPLND是一种安全可行的替代O-RPLND的方法。最佳结果取决于细致的术前计划、患者选择和手术专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书