Recommendations for the Management of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension With Spinal Longitudinal Epidural CSF Collection: A Delphi Study.

IF 8.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology Pub Date : 2026-11-10 Epub Date: 2026-10-16 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000218638
Soyoun Choi, Ian Carroll, Deborah I Friedman, Peter G Kranz, Eugene Lee, Manjit Matharu, Simy Parikh, Henrik W Schytz, Marcio Nattan Portes Souza, Yen-Feng Wang, Hsiangkuo Yuan, Mi Ji Lee
{"title":"Recommendations for the Management of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension With Spinal Longitudinal Epidural CSF Collection: A Delphi Study.","authors":"Soyoun Choi, Ian Carroll, Deborah I Friedman, Peter G Kranz, Eugene Lee, Manjit Matharu, Simy Parikh, Henrik W Schytz, Marcio Nattan Portes Souza, Yen-Feng Wang, Hsiangkuo Yuan, Mi Ji Lee","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000218638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) results from spinal CSF leakage. Epidural blood patch (EBP) is an important first-line treatment. However, pre-EBP, intra-EBP, and post-EBP practice varies widely owing to limited consensus guidance. We aimed to develop expert consensus statements to support clinical decision-making in SIH management, including peri-EBP practices, focusing on patients with spinal longitudinal epidural CSF collection (SLEC) before definitive leak type classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international multidisciplinary Delphi process was conducted between January 2024 and July 2025, involving experts in neurology, neurosurgery, radiology, and anesthesiology. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement for strong agreement, 60%-69% for partial agreement, and <60% for no consensus, based on a 5-point Likert scale in round 3. Responses were collected anonymously using an online survey platform, with summarized feedback from the previous round provided between rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen experts were invited, with 10, 9, and 9 participants in rounds 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Before EBP, bed rest was recommended for recent-onset SIH with severe orthostatic headache (88.9%); other conservative methods such as abdominal binder and hydration were considered not mandatory (90%). Semitargeted EBP was recommended as initial management for patients with extradural CSF collections (70%). Dynamic CT myelography was preferred for localization (70%). Post-EBP care was variable, particularly in bed rest duration, with most recommendations (70%) exceeding 12 hours. Definitions of clinical remission (80%) and radiologic remission (90%) were established. Radiologic follow-up after clinical remission was recommended (78%). No consensus was reached on follow-up strategies for persistent symptoms, although \"doing nothing\" was not recommended. No consensus was reached for persistent extradural CSF despite clinical remission, requiring an individualized approach. Light activity after EBP was recommended within a few days (70%). No consensus was reached on the optimal number of EBPs before invasive leak localization or surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This Delphi study outlines expert recommendations and uncertainties for SIH management, including peri-EBP practices. This study incorporated the initial management strategy for patients in whom leak-type classification was incomplete. However, the treatment section primarily focused on the SLEC-positive setting and presumed ventral dural tears; lateral dural tears and CSF-venous fistulas warrant future consensus development.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"107 9","pages":"e218638"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000218638","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) results from spinal CSF leakage. Epidural blood patch (EBP) is an important first-line treatment. However, pre-EBP, intra-EBP, and post-EBP practice varies widely owing to limited consensus guidance. We aimed to develop expert consensus statements to support clinical decision-making in SIH management, including peri-EBP practices, focusing on patients with spinal longitudinal epidural CSF collection (SLEC) before definitive leak type classification.

Methods: An international multidisciplinary Delphi process was conducted between January 2024 and July 2025, involving experts in neurology, neurosurgery, radiology, and anesthesiology. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement for strong agreement, 60%-69% for partial agreement, and <60% for no consensus, based on a 5-point Likert scale in round 3. Responses were collected anonymously using an online survey platform, with summarized feedback from the previous round provided between rounds.

Results: Fourteen experts were invited, with 10, 9, and 9 participants in rounds 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Before EBP, bed rest was recommended for recent-onset SIH with severe orthostatic headache (88.9%); other conservative methods such as abdominal binder and hydration were considered not mandatory (90%). Semitargeted EBP was recommended as initial management for patients with extradural CSF collections (70%). Dynamic CT myelography was preferred for localization (70%). Post-EBP care was variable, particularly in bed rest duration, with most recommendations (70%) exceeding 12 hours. Definitions of clinical remission (80%) and radiologic remission (90%) were established. Radiologic follow-up after clinical remission was recommended (78%). No consensus was reached on follow-up strategies for persistent symptoms, although "doing nothing" was not recommended. No consensus was reached for persistent extradural CSF despite clinical remission, requiring an individualized approach. Light activity after EBP was recommended within a few days (70%). No consensus was reached on the optimal number of EBPs before invasive leak localization or surgical intervention.

Discussion: This Delphi study outlines expert recommendations and uncertainties for SIH management, including peri-EBP practices. This study incorporated the initial management strategy for patients in whom leak-type classification was incomplete. However, the treatment section primarily focused on the SLEC-positive setting and presumed ventral dural tears; lateral dural tears and CSF-venous fistulas warrant future consensus development.

脊髓纵向硬膜外脑脊液采集治疗自发性颅内低血压的建议:德尔菲研究。
背景和目的:自发性颅内低血压(SIH)是由脑脊液渗漏引起的。硬膜外补血(EBP)是重要的一线治疗方法。然而,由于有限的共识指导,ebp前、ebp内和ebp后的实践差异很大。我们的目标是制定专家共识声明,以支持SIH管理的临床决策,包括围ebp实践,重点关注脊柱纵向硬膜外脑脊液采集(SLEC)患者在确定泄漏类型分类之前。方法:在2024年1月至2025年7月期间进行国际多学科德尔菲过程,涉及神经病学,神经外科,放射学和麻醉学专家。共识被先验地定义为≥70%的强烈同意,60%-69%的部分同意,结果:邀请了14位专家,在第1轮、第2轮和第3轮分别有10位、9位和9位参与者。在EBP之前,建议卧床休息的新发SIH伴严重直立性头痛(88.9%);其他保守的方法,如腹部捆绑和水合作用被认为不是强制性的(90%)。半靶向EBP被推荐作为硬膜外脑脊液收集患者的初始治疗(70%)。动态CT脊髓造影是定位的首选方法(70%)。ebp后的护理是可变的,特别是卧床休息时间,大多数建议(70%)超过12小时。建立了临床缓解(80%)和放射缓解(90%)的定义。临床缓解后建议进行放射学随访(78%)。尽管不建议“什么都不做”,但对于持续症状的随访策略尚未达成共识。尽管临床缓解,但对于持续性硬膜外脑脊液仍未达成共识,需要个体化治疗。EBP术后建议在几天内进行轻度活动(70%)。在有创性渗漏定位或手术干预前,ebp的最佳数量尚未达成共识。讨论:本德尔菲研究概述了专家建议和不确定性的SIH管理,包括围ebp实践。本研究纳入了渗漏类型分类不完整的患者的初始管理策略。然而,治疗部分主要集中在slc阳性设置和假定的腹侧硬膜撕裂;侧硬脑膜撕裂和csf -静脉瘘需要未来的共识发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书