Combining responsive neurostimulation with resection or ablation for treatment of epilepsy: a multicenter experience.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christian G Lopez Ramos, Ahmed M Raslan, Vikram R Rao, Edward F Chang, Max Liu, Vaishnav Krishnan, Sameer A Sheth, Danika L Paulo, Sanjay E Patra, David E Burdette, Philip M McCarthy, Christopher Skidmore, Chengyuan Wu, Robert Ziechmann, Lilit Mnatsakanyan, Sumeet Vadera, Dawn Eliashiv, Itzhak Fried, Muayad Alzuabi, Imran H Quraishi, Jason Gerrard, Tuan Bui, Utku Uysal, Michael Kinsman, Martin McCandless, Lia D Ernst
{"title":"Combining responsive neurostimulation with resection or ablation for treatment of epilepsy: a multicenter experience.","authors":"Christian G Lopez Ramos, Ahmed M Raslan, Vikram R Rao, Edward F Chang, Max Liu, Vaishnav Krishnan, Sameer A Sheth, Danika L Paulo, Sanjay E Patra, David E Burdette, Philip M McCarthy, Christopher Skidmore, Chengyuan Wu, Robert Ziechmann, Lilit Mnatsakanyan, Sumeet Vadera, Dawn Eliashiv, Itzhak Fried, Muayad Alzuabi, Imran H Quraishi, Jason Gerrard, Tuan Bui, Utku Uysal, Michael Kinsman, Martin McCandless, Lia D Ernst","doi":"10.3171/2026.5.JNS252911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite advances in surgical and neuromodulatory treatments, a substantial proportion of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy remain ineligible for standalone resection or ablation. Combining resection or laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) with responsive neurostimulation (RNS) has emerged as a promising approach for patients with multifocal seizure onset or eloquent cortex involvement. However, the clinical impact of combination surgery remains poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical rationale and surgical decision-making used across multiple high-volume epilepsy centers performing combination surgeries, and to evaluate the seizure outcomes and safety profile associated with this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent RNS implantation in combination with resection or LITT at 9 epilepsy centers and had ≥ 1 year of follow-up. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and seizure outcome data were collected. The primary outcome was seizure reduction at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included the Clinical Global Impression and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 73 patients (40 male, mean age 34 years) with a mean epilepsy duration of 21 years were included in this analysis. The most common etiology was unknown (37%), followed by cortical malformation (16%). Most patients experienced focal impaired consciousness (FIC, 78%) and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (FBTC, 70%) seizures. Prior resection was performed in 23%. Combination procedures were performed on the same day in 89% of patients. RNS implantation was concurrent with resection in 92% and with LITT in 8.2% of patients. Neocortical and mesial temporal regions accounted for 61% of resection/ablation targets. More than two-thirds of RNS leads were subdural strips, most commonly in the left hemisphere (73%). Indications for the combined approach included eloquent cortex involvement (67%) and multifocal seizure onset (33%) or both (9.6%). At 1 year, mean seizure reductions were 53% for focal impaired, 69% for FIC, and 67% for FBTC seizures. Overall, 48% of patients had at least a 6-month period of seizure freedom, and 4 patients had no seizures after surgery. Significant global clinical improvement (much or very much improved) was observed in 79% of patients. Three patients experienced infection, and 1 patient died due to causes unrelated to surgical treatment (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined RNS with resection or ablation might provide meaningful seizure control in complex drug-resistant epilepsy with acceptable safety profiles. These findings describe current practice and support further investigation of hybrid surgical strategies in patients with challenging seizure networks as a potential treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2026.5.JNS252911","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite advances in surgical and neuromodulatory treatments, a substantial proportion of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy remain ineligible for standalone resection or ablation. Combining resection or laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) with responsive neurostimulation (RNS) has emerged as a promising approach for patients with multifocal seizure onset or eloquent cortex involvement. However, the clinical impact of combination surgery remains poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical rationale and surgical decision-making used across multiple high-volume epilepsy centers performing combination surgeries, and to evaluate the seizure outcomes and safety profile associated with this approach.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent RNS implantation in combination with resection or LITT at 9 epilepsy centers and had ≥ 1 year of follow-up. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and seizure outcome data were collected. The primary outcome was seizure reduction at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included the Clinical Global Impression and adverse events.

Results: Overall, 73 patients (40 male, mean age 34 years) with a mean epilepsy duration of 21 years were included in this analysis. The most common etiology was unknown (37%), followed by cortical malformation (16%). Most patients experienced focal impaired consciousness (FIC, 78%) and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (FBTC, 70%) seizures. Prior resection was performed in 23%. Combination procedures were performed on the same day in 89% of patients. RNS implantation was concurrent with resection in 92% and with LITT in 8.2% of patients. Neocortical and mesial temporal regions accounted for 61% of resection/ablation targets. More than two-thirds of RNS leads were subdural strips, most commonly in the left hemisphere (73%). Indications for the combined approach included eloquent cortex involvement (67%) and multifocal seizure onset (33%) or both (9.6%). At 1 year, mean seizure reductions were 53% for focal impaired, 69% for FIC, and 67% for FBTC seizures. Overall, 48% of patients had at least a 6-month period of seizure freedom, and 4 patients had no seizures after surgery. Significant global clinical improvement (much or very much improved) was observed in 79% of patients. Three patients experienced infection, and 1 patient died due to causes unrelated to surgical treatment (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy).

Conclusions: Combined RNS with resection or ablation might provide meaningful seizure control in complex drug-resistant epilepsy with acceptable safety profiles. These findings describe current practice and support further investigation of hybrid surgical strategies in patients with challenging seizure networks as a potential treatment strategy.

结合反应性神经刺激与切除或消融治疗癫痫:多中心经验。
目的:尽管外科和神经调节治疗取得了进展,但很大一部分耐药癫痫患者仍然不适合单独切除或消融。联合切除或激光间质热疗法(LITT)与反应性神经刺激(RNS)已成为治疗多灶性癫痫发作或明显皮层受累患者的一种很有前途的方法。然而,联合手术的临床影响仍然不清楚。本研究的目的是描述多个大容量癫痫中心进行联合手术的临床依据和手术决策,并评估与该方法相关的癫痫发作结果和安全性。方法:本回顾性研究纳入9个癫痫中心接受RNS植入联合手术切除或LITT的耐药癫痫患者,随访≥1年。收集了人口统计学、临床、手术和癫痫发作结果数据。主要结局是1年后癫痫发作减少。次要结局包括临床总体印象和不良事件。结果:本研究共纳入73例患者(男性40例,平均年龄34岁),平均癫痫持续时间为21年。最常见的病因不明(37%),其次是皮质畸形(16%)。大多数患者经历局灶性意识受损(FIC, 78%)和局灶性至双侧强直-阵挛(FBTC, 70%)癫痫发作。术前切除的占23%。89%的患者在同一天进行了联合治疗。RNS植入与切除同时进行的患者占92%,与LITT同时进行的患者占8.2%。新皮层和内侧颞区占切除/消融目标的61%。超过三分之二的RNS导联是硬脑膜下条,最常见于左半球(73%)。联合入路的适应症包括明显的皮层受累(67%)和多灶性癫痫发作(33%)或两者兼有(9.6%)。1年后,局灶性受损患者癫痫发作平均减少53%,FIC患者减少69%,FBTC患者减少67%。总体而言,48%的患者至少有6个月的癫痫发作自由期,4例患者术后无癫痫发作。在79%的患者中观察到显著的整体临床改善(大大或非常改善)。3例患者发生感染,1例患者因与手术治疗无关的原因死亡(癫痫猝死)。结论:RNS联合切除或消融可能为复杂的耐药癫痫提供有意义的癫痫发作控制,并具有可接受的安全性。这些发现描述了目前的实践,并支持进一步研究混合手术策略作为潜在的治疗策略在具有挑战性的癫痫发作网络的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书