Cervical Cancer Screening Rates by Race and Ethnicity, Age, Language, and Census Region.

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yunbo Xie, Linh Nguyen, Yen-Chi Le, Abigail Zamorano
{"title":"Cervical Cancer Screening Rates by Race and Ethnicity, Age, Language, and Census Region.","authors":"Yunbo Xie, Linh Nguyen, Yen-Chi Le, Abigail Zamorano","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.39938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Longitudinal evidence of cervical cancer screening (CCS) trends before and after COVID-19 across demographic cohorts remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine CCS rates by race and ethnicity, age, language, and census region among patients with at least 1 health care encounter in an electronic medical record (EMR) system from 2019 through 2024, and to evaluate longitudinal trends across these groups.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Using an EMR database, this cross-sectional study evaluated CCS rates among female patients aged 21 to 64 years between 2019 and 2024, stratified by race and ethnicity, age, language, and census region.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Race and ethnicity, age, language, and census region.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Descriptive statistics were used to summarize annual CCS rates across demographic groups. The Cochran-Armitage test assessed linear trends over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Annual sample sizes ranged from approximately 9 to 16 million patients and increased steadily over time; analytic population sizes varied across subgroups. Most patients were non-Hispanic White, aged 30 to 49 years, English-speaking, and resided in either the South or Northeast. Non-Hispanic White patients had the highest annual CCS rates from 2019 to 2021 but experienced the smallest percentage increase, from 10.98% (95% CI, 10.96%-11.01%) to 13.85% (95% CI, 13.82%-13.87%), over the study period. Hispanic patients experienced the largest percentage increase in CCS rates, from 9.85% (95% CI, 9.80%-9.90%) to 15.51% (95% CI, 15.47%-15.55%). American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander patients had the lowest screening rates throughout the study period. Patients aged 30 to 49 years and non-English-speaking patients consistently had the highest CCS rates across all years. Patients in the Western and Southern census regions had lower CCS rates than those in other regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study of patients with at least 1 health care encounter in an EMR system, all CCS rates increased across all racial and ethnic groups from 2019 to 2024, with the greatest gains observed among Hispanic patients. However, persistent disparities remained, particularly among American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander patients and those in the Western and Southern regions. These findings suggest that although screening uptake has improved over time, substantial geographic and racial and ethnic disparities in CCS persist, highlighting important areas for future research and intervention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"9 10","pages":"e2639938"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13675824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.39938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Longitudinal evidence of cervical cancer screening (CCS) trends before and after COVID-19 across demographic cohorts remains limited.

Objective: To examine CCS rates by race and ethnicity, age, language, and census region among patients with at least 1 health care encounter in an electronic medical record (EMR) system from 2019 through 2024, and to evaluate longitudinal trends across these groups.

Design, setting, and participants: Using an EMR database, this cross-sectional study evaluated CCS rates among female patients aged 21 to 64 years between 2019 and 2024, stratified by race and ethnicity, age, language, and census region.

Exposures: Race and ethnicity, age, language, and census region.

Main outcomes and measures: Descriptive statistics were used to summarize annual CCS rates across demographic groups. The Cochran-Armitage test assessed linear trends over time.

Results: Annual sample sizes ranged from approximately 9 to 16 million patients and increased steadily over time; analytic population sizes varied across subgroups. Most patients were non-Hispanic White, aged 30 to 49 years, English-speaking, and resided in either the South or Northeast. Non-Hispanic White patients had the highest annual CCS rates from 2019 to 2021 but experienced the smallest percentage increase, from 10.98% (95% CI, 10.96%-11.01%) to 13.85% (95% CI, 13.82%-13.87%), over the study period. Hispanic patients experienced the largest percentage increase in CCS rates, from 9.85% (95% CI, 9.80%-9.90%) to 15.51% (95% CI, 15.47%-15.55%). American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander patients had the lowest screening rates throughout the study period. Patients aged 30 to 49 years and non-English-speaking patients consistently had the highest CCS rates across all years. Patients in the Western and Southern census regions had lower CCS rates than those in other regions.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study of patients with at least 1 health care encounter in an EMR system, all CCS rates increased across all racial and ethnic groups from 2019 to 2024, with the greatest gains observed among Hispanic patients. However, persistent disparities remained, particularly among American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander patients and those in the Western and Southern regions. These findings suggest that although screening uptake has improved over time, substantial geographic and racial and ethnic disparities in CCS persist, highlighting important areas for future research and intervention efforts.

子宫颈癌筛检率按种族、民族、年龄、语言及普查地区划分。
重要性:2019冠状病毒病前后宫颈癌筛查(CCS)趋势的纵向证据仍然有限。目的:从2019年到2024年,在电子病历(EMR)系统中至少有过一次医疗服务的患者中,按种族、民族、年龄、语言和人口普查地区检查CCS率,并评估这些群体的纵向趋势。设计、环境和参与者:使用EMR数据库,本横断面研究评估了2019年至2024年间21至64岁女性患者的CCS率,并按种族、民族、年龄、语言和人口普查地区分层。暴露因素:种族和民族、年龄、语言和人口普查地区。主要结果和测量方法:描述性统计用于总结不同人口群体的年度CCS率。科克伦-阿米蒂奇测试评估了随时间的线性趋势。结果:年样本量约为900万至1600万患者,并随时间稳步增加;分析人群的规模在不同的亚组中有所不同。大多数患者是非西班牙裔白人,年龄30至49岁,说英语,居住在南部或东北部。在2019年至2021年期间,非西班牙裔白人患者的年CCS率最高,但增幅最小,从10.98% (95% CI, 10.96%-11.01%)降至13.85% (95% CI, 13.82%-13.87%)。西班牙裔患者的CCS率增幅最大,从9.85% (95% CI, 9.80%-9.90%)增至15.51% (95% CI, 15.47%-15.55%)。在整个研究期间,美国印第安人、阿拉斯加原住民、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民患者的筛查率最低。30至49岁的患者和非英语患者在所有年份中始终具有最高的CCS率。西部和南部人口普查地区的患者的CCS率低于其他地区。结论和相关性:在这项针对在EMR系统中至少有一次医疗保健就诊的患者的横断面研究中,从2019年到2024年,所有种族和族裔群体的所有CCS率都有所增加,其中西班牙裔患者的获益最大。然而,持续的差异仍然存在,特别是在美国印第安人、阿拉斯加原住民、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民患者以及西部和南部地区的患者中。这些发现表明,尽管随着时间的推移,筛查的接受程度有所提高,但CCS的地理和种族差异仍然存在,这突出了未来研究和干预工作的重要领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书