Burden of Informal Medical Consultations via Digital Platforms Among Medical Students and Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kudret Selki, Mustafa Enes Demirel, Mustafa Boğan, Melek Karaduman, Havva Beyza Ertunç, Yasin Bozkurt, Ceren Akkaya, Ömer Akif Öztürk
{"title":"Burden of Informal Medical Consultations via Digital Platforms Among Medical Students and Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Kudret Selki, Mustafa Enes Demirel, Mustafa Boğan, Melek Karaduman, Havva Beyza Ertunç, Yasin Bozkurt, Ceren Akkaya, Ömer Akif Öztürk","doi":"10.1007/s11606-026-10944-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Informal medical consultations via phone and messaging apps are increasingly common. Though perceived as practical, they may create stress and blur professional boundaries. This study evaluated the frequency and characteristics of these requests and their impact on occupational well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study included 191 medical students and physicians. The questionnaire assessed the frequency and characteristics of informal medical consultation requests received within the previous week, their perceived impact on work-life balance, stress/anxiety, perceived boundary violation, and response behaviors. A modified version of the Mini-Z 2.0 instrument was used to assess domains such as stress, workload, and job satisfaction. A study-specific composite total occupational well-being score was calculated, with higher scores indicating better occupational well-being. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the Mini-Z total score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 191 participants, 29 (15.2%) reported receiving no requests, 140 (73.3%) reported 1-5 requests, and 22 (11.5%) reported ≥ 6 requests in the previous week. Requests were most commonly delivered via WhatsApp or similar applications (60.7%) and were most often initiated by family members or relatives (70.7%). Most participants reported that the requests were unrelated to their own specialty (80.1%) and mostly non-urgent (98.4%). Perceived stress/anxiety and boundary violation increased significantly according to request frequency (p = 0.027 and p = 0.021, respectively), whereas modified Mini-Z total scores did not (p = 0.528). In multivariable analysis, responding \"depending on the situation\" or \"did not respond\" was independently associated with lower modified Mini-Z total scores (B = -2.55; 95% CI -4.72 to -0.38; p = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Informal medical consultation requests through phone calls and messaging applications are common and, although mostly non-urgent, may generate stress and perceived boundary violation. Their impact on occupational well-being may depend less on request frequency itself than on how these requests are experienced and managed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-026-10944-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Informal medical consultations via phone and messaging apps are increasingly common. Though perceived as practical, they may create stress and blur professional boundaries. This study evaluated the frequency and characteristics of these requests and their impact on occupational well-being.

Methods: This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study included 191 medical students and physicians. The questionnaire assessed the frequency and characteristics of informal medical consultation requests received within the previous week, their perceived impact on work-life balance, stress/anxiety, perceived boundary violation, and response behaviors. A modified version of the Mini-Z 2.0 instrument was used to assess domains such as stress, workload, and job satisfaction. A study-specific composite total occupational well-being score was calculated, with higher scores indicating better occupational well-being. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the Mini-Z total score.

Results: Of the 191 participants, 29 (15.2%) reported receiving no requests, 140 (73.3%) reported 1-5 requests, and 22 (11.5%) reported ≥ 6 requests in the previous week. Requests were most commonly delivered via WhatsApp or similar applications (60.7%) and were most often initiated by family members or relatives (70.7%). Most participants reported that the requests were unrelated to their own specialty (80.1%) and mostly non-urgent (98.4%). Perceived stress/anxiety and boundary violation increased significantly according to request frequency (p = 0.027 and p = 0.021, respectively), whereas modified Mini-Z total scores did not (p = 0.528). In multivariable analysis, responding "depending on the situation" or "did not respond" was independently associated with lower modified Mini-Z total scores (B = -2.55; 95% CI -4.72 to -0.38; p = 0.022).

Conclusions: Informal medical consultation requests through phone calls and messaging applications are common and, although mostly non-urgent, may generate stress and perceived boundary violation. Their impact on occupational well-being may depend less on request frequency itself than on how these requests are experienced and managed.

医学生和医生通过数字平台的非正式医疗咨询负担:一项横断面调查。
导读:通过电话和短信应用进行的非正式医疗咨询越来越普遍。虽然被认为是实用的,但它们可能会带来压力,模糊职业界限。本研究评估了这些要求的频率和特征及其对职业幸福感的影响。方法:采用横断面、问卷调查法对191名医学生和医师进行调查。问卷评估了前一周内收到的非正式医疗咨询请求的频率和特征,对工作与生活平衡、压力/焦虑、感知边界侵犯和回应行为的感知影响。使用mini - z2.0的改进版本来评估压力、工作量和工作满意度等领域。计算了研究特定的综合总职业幸福感得分,得分越高表明职业幸福感越好。采用单变量和多变量线性回归分析确定与Mini-Z总分相关的因素。结果:在191名参与者中,29名(15.2%)报告没有收到请求,140名(73.3%)报告1-5个请求,22名(11.5%)报告在前一周收到≥6个请求。最常见的请求是通过WhatsApp或类似的应用程序发出的(60.7%),最常见的请求是由家庭成员或亲戚发起的(70.7%)。大多数参与者报告说,这些请求与他们自己的专业无关(80.1%),大多数是非紧急的(98.4%)。感知压力/焦虑和边界侵犯随请求频率的增加而显著增加(p = 0.027和p = 0.021),而修改后的Mini-Z总分无显著差异(p = 0.528)。在多变量分析中,回答“视情况而定”或“不回应”与较低的修正Mini-Z总分独立相关(B = -2.55; 95% CI -4.72至-0.38;p = 0.022)。结论:通过电话和短信应用程序提出的非正式医疗咨询请求是常见的,尽管大多数是非紧急的,但可能会产生压力和感知边界侵犯。它们对职业福祉的影响可能更多地取决于如何体验和管理这些请求,而不是请求频率本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书