Gedatolisib after CDK4/6 inhibition in HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: pharmacology, phase III evidence, and therapeutic positioning.
{"title":"Gedatolisib after CDK4/6 inhibition in HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: pharmacology, phase III evidence, and therapeutic positioning.","authors":"Aziz Ullah, Muhammad Saeed Akhtar","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2026.2752126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Progression following CDK4/6 inhibition remains a therapeutic challenge in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Gedatolisib, an FDA-approved pan-class I PI3K/mTORC1/2 inhibitor, introduces a treatment strategy for disease without a detected PIK3CA mutation.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review critically evaluates gedatolisib pharmacology, clinical evidence, safety, biomarkers, and therapeutic positioning. PubMed/MEDLINE, publisher platforms, ClinicalTrials.gov, regulatory sources, and oncology conference records were searched through July 2026, with updates through September 2026. In phase III VIKTORIA-1, median progression-free survival was 9.3 versus 2.0 months with gedatolisib-fulvestrant-palbociclib versus fulvestrant (hazard ratio 0.24) and 7.4 versus 2.0 months with gedatolisib-fulvestrant versus fulvestrant (hazard ratio 0.33). Experimental regimens were not directly compared in a powered analysis. Stomatitis, metabolic toxicity, palbociclib-associated neutropenia, and weekly intravenous administration complicate treatment delivery.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Gedatolisib expands post-CDK4/6 treatment options, but optimal positioning requires individualized patient selection without assuming triplet superiority. Mature survival outcomes, validated predictive biomarkers, comparative sequencing evidence, and VIKTORIA-2 findings will determine its long-term clinical value.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2026.2752126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Progression following CDK4/6 inhibition remains a therapeutic challenge in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Gedatolisib, an FDA-approved pan-class I PI3K/mTORC1/2 inhibitor, introduces a treatment strategy for disease without a detected PIK3CA mutation.
Areas covered: This review critically evaluates gedatolisib pharmacology, clinical evidence, safety, biomarkers, and therapeutic positioning. PubMed/MEDLINE, publisher platforms, ClinicalTrials.gov, regulatory sources, and oncology conference records were searched through July 2026, with updates through September 2026. In phase III VIKTORIA-1, median progression-free survival was 9.3 versus 2.0 months with gedatolisib-fulvestrant-palbociclib versus fulvestrant (hazard ratio 0.24) and 7.4 versus 2.0 months with gedatolisib-fulvestrant versus fulvestrant (hazard ratio 0.33). Experimental regimens were not directly compared in a powered analysis. Stomatitis, metabolic toxicity, palbociclib-associated neutropenia, and weekly intravenous administration complicate treatment delivery.
Expert opinion: Gedatolisib expands post-CDK4/6 treatment options, but optimal positioning requires individualized patient selection without assuming triplet superiority. Mature survival outcomes, validated predictive biomarkers, comparative sequencing evidence, and VIKTORIA-2 findings will determine its long-term clinical value.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.