Separating prognostic association from treatment-effect modification of a baseline mucosal inflammatory-response score in ulcerative colitis biologic trials

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mengyao Jiang, Qingxi Meng, Linghan Xue
{"title":"Separating prognostic association from treatment-effect modification of a baseline mucosal inflammatory-response score in ulcerative colitis biologic trials","authors":"Mengyao Jiang,&nbsp;Qingxi Meng,&nbsp;Linghan Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.clinre.2026.102943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Baseline mucosal inflammation may be associated with outcome without modifying treatment benefit. We separated these questions for a fixed inflammatory-response score in ulcerative colitis biologic studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A fixed 200-gene score was calculated with platform-specific probe mapping and accession-level baseline standardization. Treatment-by-score interactions were estimated in three randomized active-versus-placebo datasets. Prognostic associations were synthesized across seven treated cohorts, longitudinal change across six paired cohorts, and cellular localization using donor-aware single-cell summaries.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The randomized branch included 681 participants. All three interaction odds ratios were below one (0.64, 0.46, and 0.76), but their 95% confidence intervals were wide and crossed one. Among 541 actively treated participants, higher baseline scores were associated with poorer outcome (pooled odds ratio 0.44, 0.33-0.58). Among 154 paired participants, responders had a lower baseline-adjusted follow-up score (-1.07 standardized units, -1.61 to -0.53). Analysis of 212,623 cells localized the programme across epithelial, myeloid, and fibroblast/pericyte compartments. Baseline compartment analyses included only 18-19 donors and did not establish a remission association.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Across the analysed public datasets, baseline mucosal inflammation showed a consistent adverse prognostic association and response-associated decline. The randomized evidence did not establish treatment-effect modification, and prospective independent validation is required before clinical use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10424,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","volume":"50 9","pages":"Article 102943"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210740126001889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Baseline mucosal inflammation may be associated with outcome without modifying treatment benefit. We separated these questions for a fixed inflammatory-response score in ulcerative colitis biologic studies.

Methods

A fixed 200-gene score was calculated with platform-specific probe mapping and accession-level baseline standardization. Treatment-by-score interactions were estimated in three randomized active-versus-placebo datasets. Prognostic associations were synthesized across seven treated cohorts, longitudinal change across six paired cohorts, and cellular localization using donor-aware single-cell summaries.

Results

The randomized branch included 681 participants. All three interaction odds ratios were below one (0.64, 0.46, and 0.76), but their 95% confidence intervals were wide and crossed one. Among 541 actively treated participants, higher baseline scores were associated with poorer outcome (pooled odds ratio 0.44, 0.33-0.58). Among 154 paired participants, responders had a lower baseline-adjusted follow-up score (-1.07 standardized units, -1.61 to -0.53). Analysis of 212,623 cells localized the programme across epithelial, myeloid, and fibroblast/pericyte compartments. Baseline compartment analyses included only 18-19 donors and did not establish a remission association.

Conclusions

Across the analysed public datasets, baseline mucosal inflammation showed a consistent adverse prognostic association and response-associated decline. The randomized evidence did not establish treatment-effect modification, and prospective independent validation is required before clinical use.
溃疡性结肠炎生物学试验中基线粘膜炎症反应评分的预后关联与治疗效果改变的分离
背景和目的:基线粘膜炎症可能与预后相关,但不影响治疗效果。在溃疡性结肠炎生物学研究中,我们将这些问题分开,以获得一个固定的炎症反应评分。方法:采用平台特异性探针定位和接入级基线标准化计算固定的200个基因评分。在三个随机的主动与安慰剂数据集中评估了按评分治疗的相互作用。预后关联在七个治疗队列中进行了综合,在六个配对队列中进行了纵向变化,并使用供体感知的单细胞摘要进行了细胞定位。结果:随机分组共纳入681名受试者。所有三种相互作用优势比均低于1(0.64、0.46和0.76),但它们的95%置信区间很宽且交叉于1。在541名积极治疗的参与者中,较高的基线评分与较差的结果相关(合并优势比0.44,0.33-0.58)。在154名配对参与者中,应答者的基线调整随访评分较低(-1.07标准化单位,-1.61至-0.53)。对212,623个细胞的分析将该程序定位在上皮细胞、髓细胞和成纤维细胞/周细胞间室。基线室分析仅包括18-19名供者,并没有建立缓解关系。结论:在分析的公共数据集中,基线粘膜炎症显示出一致的不良预后关联和反应相关的下降。随机证据没有建立治疗效果的改变,在临床使用前需要前瞻性独立验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology publishes high-quality original research papers in the field of hepatology and gastroenterology. The editors put the accent on rapid communication of new research and clinical developments and so called "hot topic" issues. Following a clear Editorial line, besides original articles and case reports, each issue features editorials, commentaries and reviews. The journal encourages research and discussion between all those involved in the specialty on an international level. All articles are peer reviewed by international experts, the articles in press are online and indexed in the international databases (Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct). Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology is a subscription journal (with optional open access), which allows you to publish your research without any cost to you (unless you proactively chose the open access option). Your article will be available to all researchers around the globe whose institution has a subscription to the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书