Juliette Lewis, Mary Friend, Corinne Gautreaux, Carlyse Salter, Fion Chang, William Richards, Jon Simmons, Steven Miller, Maryann Mbaka
{"title":"Robotic Surgery in Acute Care: Development of an Educational Pathway and Single-Institution Outcomes.","authors":"Juliette Lewis, Mary Friend, Corinne Gautreaux, Carlyse Salter, Fion Chang, William Richards, Jon Simmons, Steven Miller, Maryann Mbaka","doi":"10.1177/00031348261500238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundRobotic surgery has been adopted across surgical subspecialties, but integration within Acute Care Surgery (ACS) has lagged. Barriers include unpredictable operative timing, competing demands for operating room (OR) resources, variable staffing, and limited access to structure robotic education for practicing acute care surgeons. We hypothesized that implementation of a robotic ACS program would require coordinated educational, operational, and staffing processes rather than reliance on surgeon training alone.MethodsThis single-institution retrospective cohort study, approved by the Institutional Review Board, evaluated a structured robotic ACS education pathway at a tertiary academic medical center. Program development centered on three components: surgeon training, staff preparedness, and staged case selection. Clinical implementation progressed from scheduled clinic cases to selected emergency department (ED) presentations and, subsequently, later-day and nighttime cases. Following adoption, the first fifty patients undergoing robotic operations between 5/2022 and 12/2024 by ACS service were evaluated to assess feasibility of implementation, and early perioperative outcomes (conversion to open surgery, complications, reoperations, and readmissions).ResultsRobotic surgery was successfully integrated into the ACS service despite initial barriers, fifty cases were successfully performed without conversions to open surgery, and no intraoperative complications. One patient (2%) required both readmission and reoperation for trapped preperitoneal fat following ventral hernia repair. Case origins include clinic (78%) and ED (22%) presentations and were performed during scheduled and off-hours periods.DiscussionA structured, multidisciplinary service-line implementation pathway enables integration of robotic surgery within ACS practice. Institutional leadership engagement, coordinated training, staff preparation, and reliable access allowed safe adoption across varied presentations without compromising outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261500238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261500238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundRobotic surgery has been adopted across surgical subspecialties, but integration within Acute Care Surgery (ACS) has lagged. Barriers include unpredictable operative timing, competing demands for operating room (OR) resources, variable staffing, and limited access to structure robotic education for practicing acute care surgeons. We hypothesized that implementation of a robotic ACS program would require coordinated educational, operational, and staffing processes rather than reliance on surgeon training alone.MethodsThis single-institution retrospective cohort study, approved by the Institutional Review Board, evaluated a structured robotic ACS education pathway at a tertiary academic medical center. Program development centered on three components: surgeon training, staff preparedness, and staged case selection. Clinical implementation progressed from scheduled clinic cases to selected emergency department (ED) presentations and, subsequently, later-day and nighttime cases. Following adoption, the first fifty patients undergoing robotic operations between 5/2022 and 12/2024 by ACS service were evaluated to assess feasibility of implementation, and early perioperative outcomes (conversion to open surgery, complications, reoperations, and readmissions).ResultsRobotic surgery was successfully integrated into the ACS service despite initial barriers, fifty cases were successfully performed without conversions to open surgery, and no intraoperative complications. One patient (2%) required both readmission and reoperation for trapped preperitoneal fat following ventral hernia repair. Case origins include clinic (78%) and ED (22%) presentations and were performed during scheduled and off-hours periods.DiscussionA structured, multidisciplinary service-line implementation pathway enables integration of robotic surgery within ACS practice. Institutional leadership engagement, coordinated training, staff preparation, and reliable access allowed safe adoption across varied presentations without compromising outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.