Robotic Surgery in Acute Care: Development of an Educational Pathway and Single-Institution Outcomes.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Juliette Lewis, Mary Friend, Corinne Gautreaux, Carlyse Salter, Fion Chang, William Richards, Jon Simmons, Steven Miller, Maryann Mbaka
{"title":"Robotic Surgery in Acute Care: Development of an Educational Pathway and Single-Institution Outcomes.","authors":"Juliette Lewis, Mary Friend, Corinne Gautreaux, Carlyse Salter, Fion Chang, William Richards, Jon Simmons, Steven Miller, Maryann Mbaka","doi":"10.1177/00031348261500238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundRobotic surgery has been adopted across surgical subspecialties, but integration within Acute Care Surgery (ACS) has lagged. Barriers include unpredictable operative timing, competing demands for operating room (OR) resources, variable staffing, and limited access to structure robotic education for practicing acute care surgeons. We hypothesized that implementation of a robotic ACS program would require coordinated educational, operational, and staffing processes rather than reliance on surgeon training alone.MethodsThis single-institution retrospective cohort study, approved by the Institutional Review Board, evaluated a structured robotic ACS education pathway at a tertiary academic medical center. Program development centered on three components: surgeon training, staff preparedness, and staged case selection. Clinical implementation progressed from scheduled clinic cases to selected emergency department (ED) presentations and, subsequently, later-day and nighttime cases. Following adoption, the first fifty patients undergoing robotic operations between 5/2022 and 12/2024 by ACS service were evaluated to assess feasibility of implementation, and early perioperative outcomes (conversion to open surgery, complications, reoperations, and readmissions).ResultsRobotic surgery was successfully integrated into the ACS service despite initial barriers, fifty cases were successfully performed without conversions to open surgery, and no intraoperative complications. One patient (2%) required both readmission and reoperation for trapped preperitoneal fat following ventral hernia repair. Case origins include clinic (78%) and ED (22%) presentations and were performed during scheduled and off-hours periods.DiscussionA structured, multidisciplinary service-line implementation pathway enables integration of robotic surgery within ACS practice. Institutional leadership engagement, coordinated training, staff preparation, and reliable access allowed safe adoption across varied presentations without compromising outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348261500238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261500238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundRobotic surgery has been adopted across surgical subspecialties, but integration within Acute Care Surgery (ACS) has lagged. Barriers include unpredictable operative timing, competing demands for operating room (OR) resources, variable staffing, and limited access to structure robotic education for practicing acute care surgeons. We hypothesized that implementation of a robotic ACS program would require coordinated educational, operational, and staffing processes rather than reliance on surgeon training alone.MethodsThis single-institution retrospective cohort study, approved by the Institutional Review Board, evaluated a structured robotic ACS education pathway at a tertiary academic medical center. Program development centered on three components: surgeon training, staff preparedness, and staged case selection. Clinical implementation progressed from scheduled clinic cases to selected emergency department (ED) presentations and, subsequently, later-day and nighttime cases. Following adoption, the first fifty patients undergoing robotic operations between 5/2022 and 12/2024 by ACS service were evaluated to assess feasibility of implementation, and early perioperative outcomes (conversion to open surgery, complications, reoperations, and readmissions).ResultsRobotic surgery was successfully integrated into the ACS service despite initial barriers, fifty cases were successfully performed without conversions to open surgery, and no intraoperative complications. One patient (2%) required both readmission and reoperation for trapped preperitoneal fat following ventral hernia repair. Case origins include clinic (78%) and ED (22%) presentations and were performed during scheduled and off-hours periods.DiscussionA structured, multidisciplinary service-line implementation pathway enables integration of robotic surgery within ACS practice. Institutional leadership engagement, coordinated training, staff preparation, and reliable access allowed safe adoption across varied presentations without compromising outcomes.

急性护理中的机器人手术:教育途径的发展和单一机构的结果。
背景:机器人手术已被广泛应用于外科专科,但在急性护理外科(ACS)的整合却滞后。障碍包括不可预测的手术时间,手术室(OR)资源的竞争需求,可变的人员配置,以及对急诊外科医生进行结构化机器人教育的限制。我们假设机器人ACS项目的实施需要协调教育、操作和人员配置过程,而不仅仅依赖于外科医生的培训。方法本单机构回顾性队列研究,经机构审查委员会批准,评估了一个三级学术医疗中心的结构化机器人ACS教育途径。项目发展主要包括三个部分:外科医生培训、员工准备和分阶段病例选择。临床实施从预定的临床病例发展到选定的急诊科(ED)报告,随后是深夜和夜间病例。采用后,对ACS服务在2022年5月至2024年12月期间接受机器人手术的前50名患者进行评估,以评估实施的可行性和早期围手术期结果(转换为开放手术、并发症、再手术和再入院)。结果机器人手术克服了最初的障碍,成功地融入了ACS服务,50例手术成功,无中转开腹手术,无术中并发症。1例(2%)患者在腹疝修补后因腹膜前脂肪潴留需要再次入院和再次手术。病例来源包括诊所(78%)和急诊科(22%)的报告,并在计划和非工作时间进行。结构化的、多学科的服务线实施途径使机器人手术在ACS实践中得以整合。机构领导的参与、协调的培训、工作人员的准备和可靠的访问使得在不影响结果的情况下安全采用各种演示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书