Drug-Drug Interactions vs. Therapeutic Combinations in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Diabetes: An Ambispective Real-World Study.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Navakanth Raju Ramayanam, Bhawarlal Kavitha, Chitthi Babu Prathisha, Dharmaraj Samundeeswary, Bharath Kumar Mamilla Mugaiahgari, Bayapa Reddy Narapureddy, Sarad Pawar Naik Bukke
{"title":"Drug-Drug Interactions vs. Therapeutic Combinations in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure and Diabetes: An Ambispective Real-World Study.","authors":"Navakanth Raju Ramayanam, Bhawarlal Kavitha, Chitthi Babu Prathisha, Dharmaraj Samundeeswary, Bharath Kumar Mamilla Mugaiahgari, Bayapa Reddy Narapureddy, Sarad Pawar Naik Bukke","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concomitant congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) patients frequently are treated with polypharmacy, thus potentially increasing the risk of drug-drug interactions (pDDIs). Conventional DDI screening methods often fail to distinguish clinically significant interactions from recommended therapeutic combinations. This study assessed the prevalence, severity, and clinical consequences of pDDIs in hospitalized patients with CHF and DM. This ambispective, cross-sectional study included 144 hospitalized patients with CHF and DM. We used the Micromedex and Lexicomp databases to check prescriptions. We classified clinically relevant DDIs and therapeutic combinations requiring routine monitoring by severity. 207 pDDIs were identified, of which 84.1% were moderate and 15.9% severe. Polypharmacy was a major risk factor for the DDI burden, and over seven drugs were associated with significantly more interactions than fewer drugs (P < 0.001). Polypharmacy was an independent predictor of clinically significant DDI (AOR 3.42; 95% CI 1.78-6.59) in the multivariate analysis. The most commonly seen combinations (statin-ezetimibe and sulfonylurea-metformin therapy) are guideline-recommended and do not need to be avoided. Clinical pharmacists and prescribing clinicians performing context-aware interpretation of DDI alerts by differentiating between guideline-recommended therapeutic combinations requiring monitoring and truly actionable interactions can reduce alert fatigue, preserve evidence-based therapy, and support safe prescribing in complex CHF-DM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13675387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70528","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concomitant congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) patients frequently are treated with polypharmacy, thus potentially increasing the risk of drug-drug interactions (pDDIs). Conventional DDI screening methods often fail to distinguish clinically significant interactions from recommended therapeutic combinations. This study assessed the prevalence, severity, and clinical consequences of pDDIs in hospitalized patients with CHF and DM. This ambispective, cross-sectional study included 144 hospitalized patients with CHF and DM. We used the Micromedex and Lexicomp databases to check prescriptions. We classified clinically relevant DDIs and therapeutic combinations requiring routine monitoring by severity. 207 pDDIs were identified, of which 84.1% were moderate and 15.9% severe. Polypharmacy was a major risk factor for the DDI burden, and over seven drugs were associated with significantly more interactions than fewer drugs (P < 0.001). Polypharmacy was an independent predictor of clinically significant DDI (AOR 3.42; 95% CI 1.78-6.59) in the multivariate analysis. The most commonly seen combinations (statin-ezetimibe and sulfonylurea-metformin therapy) are guideline-recommended and do not need to be avoided. Clinical pharmacists and prescribing clinicians performing context-aware interpretation of DDI alerts by differentiating between guideline-recommended therapeutic combinations requiring monitoring and truly actionable interactions can reduce alert fatigue, preserve evidence-based therapy, and support safe prescribing in complex CHF-DM patients.

充血性心力衰竭和糖尿病患者的药物-药物相互作用与联合治疗:一项双视角现实世界研究。
合并充血性心力衰竭(CHF)和糖尿病(DM)患者经常使用多种药物治疗,因此潜在地增加了药物相互作用(pddi)的风险。传统的DDI筛查方法往往不能区分临床显著的相互作用和推荐的治疗组合。本研究评估了住院CHF和DM患者pddi的患病率、严重程度和临床后果。这项双视角、横断面研究包括144名住院CHF和DM患者。我们使用Micromedex和Lexicomp数据库检查处方。我们根据严重程度对临床相关ddi和需要常规监测的治疗组合进行了分类。共发现pddi 207例,其中84.1%为中度,15.9%为重度。多种用药是DDI负担的主要危险因素,超过7种药物的相互作用明显多于较少的药物(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书