Using eDNA to Investigate Soil Fungal Trajectory and Mammal-Fungi Interactions at an Arid Australian Restoration Site

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2026-10-14 DOI:10.1111/aec.70299
Charlotte Hogan, Katherine Moseby, John Read, Eve Slavich, Jamie R. Wood
{"title":"Using eDNA to Investigate Soil Fungal Trajectory and Mammal-Fungi Interactions at an Arid Australian Restoration Site","authors":"Charlotte Hogan,&nbsp;Katherine Moseby,&nbsp;John Read,&nbsp;Eve Slavich,&nbsp;Jamie R. Wood","doi":"10.1111/aec.70299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil fungi regulate terrestrial ecosystem function and productivity. Native digging mammals influence soil physiochemistry, thus likely affect soil fungal communities; yet despite their re-establishment in many parts of arid Australia, the influence of digging mammals on soil fungi in reintroduction areas remains largely unknown. We used high-throughput DNA sequencing to characterise the soil fungal community at an arid mammal restoration site (Wild Deserts) and an adjacent area where digging mammals are extirpated, as well as to assess the fungal content of scat from a reintroduced digging mammal, the greater bilby (<i>Macrotis lagotis</i>). We assessed the richness, composition, spatial evenness and abundance of fungal functional guilds in soil samples taken inside and outside the reserve. Additionally, we assessed the composition of fungi and fungal functional guilds in bilby scat samples collected at several timepoints (pre- and post-reintroduction). Approximately 3 years after initial reintroductions, the soil fungal community did not differ in any of the assessed measures between digging mammal-present and –absent areas. In bilby scats, there were significant differences in fungal guilds detected between the sampling periods. Litter-saprotrophic fungus <i>Chlorophyllum</i> was more abundant in bilby scats collected three-years post release at Wild Deserts, compared to those collected pre-release and relatively high abundance of <i>Chlorophyllum</i> in several scats may point to opportunistic consumption of the fungus by bilbies. While we did not observe differences in the soil fungal community inside and outside the restoration area within the study period, the strong overlap between fungal taxa detected in soil samples and post-release scats is consistent with bilbies interacting with fungi in the environment at Wild Deserts. Our work highlights a need to improve knowledge of Australian arid-zone fungi, and for long-term monitoring regimes to establish benchmarks for fungal communities and elucidate the mechanisms and timescales by which digging mammals affect soil fungal restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"51 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70299","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil fungi regulate terrestrial ecosystem function and productivity. Native digging mammals influence soil physiochemistry, thus likely affect soil fungal communities; yet despite their re-establishment in many parts of arid Australia, the influence of digging mammals on soil fungi in reintroduction areas remains largely unknown. We used high-throughput DNA sequencing to characterise the soil fungal community at an arid mammal restoration site (Wild Deserts) and an adjacent area where digging mammals are extirpated, as well as to assess the fungal content of scat from a reintroduced digging mammal, the greater bilby (Macrotis lagotis). We assessed the richness, composition, spatial evenness and abundance of fungal functional guilds in soil samples taken inside and outside the reserve. Additionally, we assessed the composition of fungi and fungal functional guilds in bilby scat samples collected at several timepoints (pre- and post-reintroduction). Approximately 3 years after initial reintroductions, the soil fungal community did not differ in any of the assessed measures between digging mammal-present and –absent areas. In bilby scats, there were significant differences in fungal guilds detected between the sampling periods. Litter-saprotrophic fungus Chlorophyllum was more abundant in bilby scats collected three-years post release at Wild Deserts, compared to those collected pre-release and relatively high abundance of Chlorophyllum in several scats may point to opportunistic consumption of the fungus by bilbies. While we did not observe differences in the soil fungal community inside and outside the restoration area within the study period, the strong overlap between fungal taxa detected in soil samples and post-release scats is consistent with bilbies interacting with fungi in the environment at Wild Deserts. Our work highlights a need to improve knowledge of Australian arid-zone fungi, and for long-term monitoring regimes to establish benchmarks for fungal communities and elucidate the mechanisms and timescales by which digging mammals affect soil fungal restoration.

利用eDNA研究澳大利亚干旱恢复地土壤真菌轨迹和哺乳动物与真菌的相互作用
土壤真菌调节陆地生态系统功能和生产力。土栖挖掘哺乳动物影响土壤理化,因此可能影响土壤真菌群落;然而,尽管它们在澳大利亚干旱的许多地区重新建立起来,但在重新引入的地区,挖掘哺乳动物对土壤真菌的影响在很大程度上仍然未知。我们使用高通量DNA测序来表征干旱哺乳动物恢复地点(野生沙漠)和邻近地区挖掘哺乳动物灭绝的土壤真菌群落,并评估重新引入的挖掘哺乳动物大兔耳袋狸(Macrotis lagotis)粪便中的真菌含量。对保护区内外土壤样品中真菌功能行会的丰富度、组成、空间均匀度和丰度进行了评价。此外,我们评估了在几个时间点(重新引入前后)收集的兔耳袋狸粪便样本中真菌和真菌功能行会的组成。在最初的重新引入大约3年后,在有哺乳动物和没有哺乳动物的地区,土壤真菌群落在任何评估措施中都没有差异。在兔耳袋狸粪便中,在采样期间检测到的真菌行会存在显着差异。野生沙漠释放3年后收集的兔耳袋狸粪便中,凋落物腐养真菌叶绿素含量高于释放前收集的兔耳袋狸粪便,其中一些粪便中叶绿素含量相对较高,这可能表明兔耳袋狸对真菌的机会性消耗。虽然我们在研究期间未观察到修复区内外土壤真菌群落的差异,但在土壤样品和释放后粪便中检测到的真菌类群之间存在很强的重叠,这与野生沙漠环境中兔耳袋狸与真菌的相互作用是一致的。我们的工作强调需要提高对澳大利亚干旱地区真菌的认识,并建立长期监测制度,以建立真菌群落的基准,并阐明挖掘哺乳动物影响土壤真菌恢复的机制和时间尺度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书