Laplacian Ranking (LaRa): A Convex Graph-Regularized Model for Multi-Criteria Ranking

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Valdecy Pereira, Marcio Pereira Basilio, Fatih Yigit
{"title":"Laplacian Ranking (LaRa): A Convex Graph-Regularized Model for Multi-Criteria Ranking","authors":"Valdecy Pereira,&nbsp;Marcio Pereira Basilio,&nbsp;Fatih Yigit","doi":"10.1002/mcda.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Laplacian Ranking (LaRa) is a graph-regularized multi-criteria decision analysis method that incorporates relational geometry among alternatives into ranking while preserving convexity, interpretability and deterministic reproducibility. LaRa combines quantile normalization, metric-weighted distances, a sparse similarity graph, a reference-oriented prior and an optional quadratic pairwise target-gap term. Its base score is the unique minimizer of a strictly convex quadratic objective, obtained by solving a symmetric positive definite linear system, with an optional deterministic dominance-repair step. We evaluate LaRa on seven literature-grounded real-data problems spanning materials, manufacturing equipment, industrial robotics, renewable-energy siting, and energy-technology selection, together with a controlled synthetic pharmaceutical-style benchmark. Five cross-domain cases use one common fixed configuration and sensitivity grid rather than dataset-specific tuning. Results show that the graph contribution is regime-dependent. It is ordinally inert for cryogenic materials and clean-energy technologies, measurable but non-disruptive for flywheel selection, improves concordance with published rankings for CNC machine tools, arc-welding robots and Colombian solar-PV siting, and reduces concordance for gear-material selection, which is retained as an explicit failure boundary. On the fixed synthetic benchmark, the high-smoothing configuration attains Kendall's <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n <mi>b</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>0.987</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\tau}_b=0.987 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and Spearman's <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>ρ</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>0.998</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\rho =0.998 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, reduces mean absolute rank error from 0.556 for TOPSIS to 0.111, and exactly recovers the Top-3 set. These findings position LaRa as a relational refinement of pointwise MCDA whose usefulness depends on whether neighbourhood geometry is substantively meaningful and empirically supported. Accordingly, graph smoothing should be activated as a conditional modelling component and accompanied by sensitivity analysis rather than assumed beneficial in practical MCDA applications.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.70042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laplacian Ranking (LaRa) is a graph-regularized multi-criteria decision analysis method that incorporates relational geometry among alternatives into ranking while preserving convexity, interpretability and deterministic reproducibility. LaRa combines quantile normalization, metric-weighted distances, a sparse similarity graph, a reference-oriented prior and an optional quadratic pairwise target-gap term. Its base score is the unique minimizer of a strictly convex quadratic objective, obtained by solving a symmetric positive definite linear system, with an optional deterministic dominance-repair step. We evaluate LaRa on seven literature-grounded real-data problems spanning materials, manufacturing equipment, industrial robotics, renewable-energy siting, and energy-technology selection, together with a controlled synthetic pharmaceutical-style benchmark. Five cross-domain cases use one common fixed configuration and sensitivity grid rather than dataset-specific tuning. Results show that the graph contribution is regime-dependent. It is ordinally inert for cryogenic materials and clean-energy technologies, measurable but non-disruptive for flywheel selection, improves concordance with published rankings for CNC machine tools, arc-welding robots and Colombian solar-PV siting, and reduces concordance for gear-material selection, which is retained as an explicit failure boundary. On the fixed synthetic benchmark, the high-smoothing configuration attains Kendall's τ b = 0.987 $$ {\tau}_b=0.987 $$ and Spearman's ρ = 0.998 $$ \rho =0.998 $$ , reduces mean absolute rank error from 0.556 for TOPSIS to 0.111, and exactly recovers the Top-3 set. These findings position LaRa as a relational refinement of pointwise MCDA whose usefulness depends on whether neighbourhood geometry is substantively meaningful and empirically supported. Accordingly, graph smoothing should be activated as a conditional modelling component and accompanied by sensitivity analysis rather than assumed beneficial in practical MCDA applications.

拉普拉斯排序(LaRa):一种多标准排序的凸图正则化模型
Laplacian Ranking (LaRa)是一种图正则化的多准则决策分析方法,它在保留凸性、可解释性和确定性再现性的同时,将备选方案之间的关系几何纳入到排序中。LaRa结合了分位数归一化、度量加权距离、稀疏相似图、面向参考的先验和可选的二次成对目标间隙项。它的基本分数是一个严格凸二次目标的唯一最小值,通过求解一个对称的正定线性系统得到,具有可选的确定性优势修复步骤。我们通过七个基于文献的实际数据问题来评估LaRa,这些问题涉及材料、制造设备、工业机器人、可再生能源选址和能源技术选择,以及受控的合成制药风格基准。五个跨域案例使用一个通用的固定配置和灵敏度网格,而不是特定于数据集的调优。结果表明,图的贡献是制度相关的。对于低温材料和清洁能源技术来说,它通常是惰性的;对于飞轮选择来说,它是可测量的,但不会造成干扰;对于CNC机床、弧焊机器人和哥伦比亚太阳能光伏定位来说,它提高了与已公布排名的一致性;对于齿轮材料选择来说,它降低了一致性,后者被保留为明确的失效边界。在固定的综合基准上,高平滑构型达到Kendall τ b = 0.987 $$ {\tau}_b=0.987 $$和Spearman ρ = 0.998 $$ \rho =0.998 $$;将TOPSIS的平均绝对排名误差从0.556降低到0.111,准确地恢复了Top-3集合。这些发现将LaRa定位为逐点MCDA的关系细化,其有用性取决于邻域几何是否具有实质性意义和经验支持。因此,在实际的MCDA应用中,图形平滑应该作为一个条件建模组件激活,并伴随着灵敏度分析,而不是假设有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis was launched in 1992, and from the outset has aimed to be the repository of choice for papers covering all aspects of MCDA/MCDM. The journal provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of all aspects of research, application and evaluation of multi-criteria decision analysis, and publishes material from a variety of disciplines and all schools of thought. Papers addressing mathematical, theoretical, and behavioural aspects are welcome, as are case studies, applications and evaluation of techniques and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书