Rural GPs’ Perspectives on SP: A Qualitative Study From Regional New South Wales

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
James Nash, Uchechukwu Levi Osuagwu
{"title":"Rural GPs’ Perspectives on SP: A Qualitative Study From Regional New South Wales","authors":"James Nash,&nbsp;Uchechukwu Levi Osuagwu","doi":"10.1155/hsc/9322682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Rural Australia faces a double burden of chronic disease and social isolation, intensified by geographic isolation and healthcare workforce shortages. Social prescribing (SP), linking patients to nonclinical community resources, offers a way to address psychosocial needs beyond pharmacological care, yet it remains underutilised and lacks a formal national framework. This study explored rural general practitioners’ (GPs) understanding, current use and perceived barriers to SP in regional New South Wales.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using a qualitative descriptive framework, semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 rural GPs (including registrars and fellows) in rural New South Wales. Data were analysed using codebook thematic analysis, incorporating both inductive coding and deductive refinement within seven predefined analytical domains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eight key themes were identified. While most GPs were unfamiliar with the formal nomenclature of ‘SP’, they viewed the concept as an intuitive ‘cornerstone’ of rural medicine. A significant ‘knowledge vacuum’ was identified, driven by high medical workforce turnover and the prevalence of fly-in, fly-out doctors who lack local community emersion. Practitioners reported a pervasive ‘pill paradigm’, where patient preference for immediate pharmacological ‘instant fixes’ over behavioural change created therapeutic resistance. Systemic friction, including the 15-min consultation limit and the ‘cascade of problems’ following the loss of a driver’s licence in sprawling rural areas, further hindered implementation. Facilitators included strong clinical rapport and nurse-led health assessments. GPs identified a latent need for ‘lifestyle hubs’ or link workers to manage behavioural follow-up and navigate vague referral pathways.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>SP is an essential but under-supported rural health program. Transitioning to a sustainable system requires addressing the knowledge gap through mandated service literacy training for transient staff, resolving systemic friction via Medicare Benefits Schedule reform for longer consultations and integrating a digital platform for routine prescribing into existing GP software for easy access to activities, and/or link workers to bridge the follow-up gap. These supports are vital for normalising SP as a routine component of rural healthcare delivery.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/9322682","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/9322682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Rural Australia faces a double burden of chronic disease and social isolation, intensified by geographic isolation and healthcare workforce shortages. Social prescribing (SP), linking patients to nonclinical community resources, offers a way to address psychosocial needs beyond pharmacological care, yet it remains underutilised and lacks a formal national framework. This study explored rural general practitioners’ (GPs) understanding, current use and perceived barriers to SP in regional New South Wales.

Methods

Using a qualitative descriptive framework, semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 rural GPs (including registrars and fellows) in rural New South Wales. Data were analysed using codebook thematic analysis, incorporating both inductive coding and deductive refinement within seven predefined analytical domains.

Results

Eight key themes were identified. While most GPs were unfamiliar with the formal nomenclature of ‘SP’, they viewed the concept as an intuitive ‘cornerstone’ of rural medicine. A significant ‘knowledge vacuum’ was identified, driven by high medical workforce turnover and the prevalence of fly-in, fly-out doctors who lack local community emersion. Practitioners reported a pervasive ‘pill paradigm’, where patient preference for immediate pharmacological ‘instant fixes’ over behavioural change created therapeutic resistance. Systemic friction, including the 15-min consultation limit and the ‘cascade of problems’ following the loss of a driver’s licence in sprawling rural areas, further hindered implementation. Facilitators included strong clinical rapport and nurse-led health assessments. GPs identified a latent need for ‘lifestyle hubs’ or link workers to manage behavioural follow-up and navigate vague referral pathways.

Conclusion

SP is an essential but under-supported rural health program. Transitioning to a sustainable system requires addressing the knowledge gap through mandated service literacy training for transient staff, resolving systemic friction via Medicare Benefits Schedule reform for longer consultations and integrating a digital platform for routine prescribing into existing GP software for easy access to activities, and/or link workers to bridge the follow-up gap. These supports are vital for normalising SP as a routine component of rural healthcare delivery.

农村全科医生对SP的看法:来自新南威尔士州地区的定性研究
背景:澳大利亚农村面临着慢性病和社会隔离的双重负担,而地理隔离和保健人力短缺又加剧了这一负担。社会处方(SP)将患者与非临床社区资源联系起来,提供了一种解决药理学护理之外的社会心理需求的方法,但它仍未得到充分利用,缺乏正式的国家框架。本研究探讨了新南威尔士州地区农村全科医生(gp)对SP的理解、当前使用和感知障碍。方法采用定性描述框架,对新南威尔士州农村地区的10名农村全科医生(包括登记员和研究员)进行了半结构化访谈。数据分析使用代码本主题分析,结合归纳编码和演绎细化在七个预定义的分析域。结果确定了8个关键主题。虽然大多数全科医生不熟悉“SP”的正式术语,但他们将这一概念视为农村医学的直观“基石”。由于医疗人员的高流动率和缺乏当地社区知名度的飞进飞出医生的普遍存在,发现了一个重要的“知识真空”。从业人员报告了一种普遍存在的“药丸范式”,即患者对立即药物“即时修复”的偏好超过了行为改变,从而产生了治疗耐药性。系统性的摩擦,包括15分钟的咨询限制和在广大农村地区失去驾照后的“一连串问题”,进一步阻碍了实施。促进因素包括牢固的临床关系和护士主导的健康评估。全科医生发现了对“生活方式中心”的潜在需求,或联系工作人员来管理行为跟踪和导航模糊的转诊途径。结论SP是一项必要但缺乏支持的农村卫生项目。向可持续系统过渡需要通过对临时工作人员进行强制性服务素养培训来解决知识差距,通过医疗保险福利计划改革来解决系统性摩擦,以延长会诊时间,并将常规处方的数字平台集成到现有的全科医生软件中,以便于访问活动,和/或联系工作人员以弥合后续差距。这些支持对于使SP正常化成为农村保健服务的常规组成部分至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书