Impact of Recovery College Online Courses Across Learner Types: A Multilevel Analysis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Galaad Lefay, Eugénie Samson-Daoust, Filippo Rapisarda, Catherine Briand
{"title":"Impact of Recovery College Online Courses Across Learner Types: A Multilevel Analysis","authors":"Galaad Lefay,&nbsp;Eugénie Samson-Daoust,&nbsp;Filippo Rapisarda,&nbsp;Catherine Briand","doi":"10.1155/hsc/1319353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated global mental health challenges, emphasising the need for community-based interventions. Recovery Colleges (RCs), offering egalitarian, colearning environments, have been associated with improvements in mental well-being, reduced stigma and greater empowerment. Despite positive outcomes, the effects of online RC courses across learner types and repeated participation remain underexplored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the impact of online RC courses on well-being, anxiety, resilience, empowerment and stigma among diverse learner groups and assess the effects of repeated participation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A quasi-experimental, repeated-measures study was conducted with 434 participants completing standardised assessments at precourse (T0), postcourse (T1) and follow-up (T2). Mixed linear models analysed the effects of time, learner types and course frequency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After correction for multiple comparisons, significant improvements were observed in well-being, anxiety, empowerment (self-esteem/self-efficacy) and disclosure/help-seeking, with benefits sustained to follow-up. Learner types influenced outcomes: Healthcare practitioners showed reduced stigma, while peer helpers, patient partners and relatives demonstrated notable empowerment gains. Repeated participation was not associated with reliable additional benefits after correction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion/Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings suggest that online RC participation is associated with improvements in mental health and reductions in stigma across diverse learner types. Sustained engagement within the RC’s mixed-learner model, rather than group-specific course designs, appears important for supporting these benefits. Future research should explore long-term impacts, mechanisms of change and service- and organisation-level outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/1319353","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/1319353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated global mental health challenges, emphasising the need for community-based interventions. Recovery Colleges (RCs), offering egalitarian, colearning environments, have been associated with improvements in mental well-being, reduced stigma and greater empowerment. Despite positive outcomes, the effects of online RC courses across learner types and repeated participation remain underexplored.

Aims

To investigate the impact of online RC courses on well-being, anxiety, resilience, empowerment and stigma among diverse learner groups and assess the effects of repeated participation.

Methods

A quasi-experimental, repeated-measures study was conducted with 434 participants completing standardised assessments at precourse (T0), postcourse (T1) and follow-up (T2). Mixed linear models analysed the effects of time, learner types and course frequency.

Results

After correction for multiple comparisons, significant improvements were observed in well-being, anxiety, empowerment (self-esteem/self-efficacy) and disclosure/help-seeking, with benefits sustained to follow-up. Learner types influenced outcomes: Healthcare practitioners showed reduced stigma, while peer helpers, patient partners and relatives demonstrated notable empowerment gains. Repeated participation was not associated with reliable additional benefits after correction.

Discussion/Conclusion

Findings suggest that online RC participation is associated with improvements in mental health and reductions in stigma across diverse learner types. Sustained engagement within the RC’s mixed-learner model, rather than group-specific course designs, appears important for supporting these benefits. Future research should explore long-term impacts, mechanisms of change and service- and organisation-level outcomes.

大学网络课程对学习者类型的影响:多层次分析
2019冠状病毒病大流行加剧了全球精神卫生挑战,强调了以社区为基础的干预措施的必要性。康复学院(RCs)提供平等、合作的学习环境,与改善心理健康、减少耻辱和增强赋权有关。尽管取得了积极的成果,但在线RC课程对学习者类型和重复参与的影响仍未得到充分探讨。目的探讨在线学习RC课程对不同学习者群体的幸福感、焦虑感、适应力、赋权和耻辱感的影响,并评估重复参与的效果。方法采用准实验、重复测量的研究方法,对434名参与者在术前(T0)、术后(T1)和随访(T2)完成标准化评估。混合线性模型分析了时间、学习者类型和课程频率的影响。结果经多重比较校正后,在幸福感、焦虑感、赋权(自尊/自我效能)和披露/求助方面均有显著改善,并持续到随访。学习者类型影响结果:医疗保健从业人员表现出较少的耻辱感,而同伴助手、患者伴侣和亲属表现出显著的赋权收益。重复参与与校正后可靠的额外获益无关。讨论/结论研究结果表明,在不同类型的学习者中,在线RC参与与心理健康的改善和耻辱的减少有关。在RC的混合学习者模式中持续参与,而不是针对小组的课程设计,似乎对支持这些好处很重要。未来的研究应该探索长期影响、变化机制以及服务和组织层面的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书