Composting Barn Systems in Dairy Production: A Global and Multidimensional Synthesis of Evidence (2015–2025)

IF 2.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Luana de Araújo Coimbra, Juliana Alves Resende, Gabriela Maria Fernandes Fiães, Alessandro de Sá Guimarães, Marcelo Henrique Otenio
{"title":"Composting Barn Systems in Dairy Production: A Global and Multidimensional Synthesis of Evidence (2015–2025)","authors":"Luana de Araújo Coimbra,&nbsp;Juliana Alves Resende,&nbsp;Gabriela Maria Fernandes Fiães,&nbsp;Alessandro de Sá Guimarães,&nbsp;Marcelo Henrique Otenio","doi":"10.1002/tqem.70478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The intensification of dairy farming has driven the adoption of more efficient and sustainable housing systems, among which the Compost Barn system stands out. However, the literature presents heterogeneous results influenced by climatic, structural, and management variations, limiting the establishment of consistent technical recommendations. This study aimed to systematically analyze scientific production on Compost Barn systems in dairy cattle farming, identifying thematic trends, temporal evolution, geographic distribution, main journals and authors, and knowledge gaps. The systematic review included original articles published between January 2015 and October 2025, retrieved from LILACS/BVS, SciELO, ScienceDirect, Scopus, CAPES Journal Portal, and PubMed in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Publications increased substantially from 2020 onward, with a peak in 2021 and strong geographic concentration in Brazil. Thematic analysis identified five main axes: animal welfare and health, milk production and quality, structure and management, microbiology, and environmental impacts/sustainability, with emphasis on comfort, health status, and bedding conditions. The literature has evolved from descriptive studies toward more analytical approaches; however, research remains fragmented, with limited integration among system components. The findings indicate that Compost Barn should be understood as an integrated biological system involving interactions among microbiological, physicochemical, management, animal welfare, productive, and environmental processes. This review provides practical insights for dairy farmers, researchers, and policymakers by supporting evidence-based management and sustainable strategies. Its novelty lies in the integrative analysis of Compost Barn as a complex biological system rather than isolated components. Future research should prioritize multidisciplinary approaches, standardized methodologies, and long-term evaluations across diverse production contexts. Addressing these gaps is essential to improve the technical understanding, management, and environmental sustainability of Compost Barn systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":35327,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Quality Management","volume":"36 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tqem.70478","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tqem.70478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intensification of dairy farming has driven the adoption of more efficient and sustainable housing systems, among which the Compost Barn system stands out. However, the literature presents heterogeneous results influenced by climatic, structural, and management variations, limiting the establishment of consistent technical recommendations. This study aimed to systematically analyze scientific production on Compost Barn systems in dairy cattle farming, identifying thematic trends, temporal evolution, geographic distribution, main journals and authors, and knowledge gaps. The systematic review included original articles published between January 2015 and October 2025, retrieved from LILACS/BVS, SciELO, ScienceDirect, Scopus, CAPES Journal Portal, and PubMed in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Publications increased substantially from 2020 onward, with a peak in 2021 and strong geographic concentration in Brazil. Thematic analysis identified five main axes: animal welfare and health, milk production and quality, structure and management, microbiology, and environmental impacts/sustainability, with emphasis on comfort, health status, and bedding conditions. The literature has evolved from descriptive studies toward more analytical approaches; however, research remains fragmented, with limited integration among system components. The findings indicate that Compost Barn should be understood as an integrated biological system involving interactions among microbiological, physicochemical, management, animal welfare, productive, and environmental processes. This review provides practical insights for dairy farmers, researchers, and policymakers by supporting evidence-based management and sustainable strategies. Its novelty lies in the integrative analysis of Compost Barn as a complex biological system rather than isolated components. Future research should prioritize multidisciplinary approaches, standardized methodologies, and long-term evaluations across diverse production contexts. Addressing these gaps is essential to improve the technical understanding, management, and environmental sustainability of Compost Barn systems.

堆肥畜舍系统在乳制品生产中的应用:全球多维证据综合(2015-2025)
奶牛养殖的集约化推动了更高效和可持续的住房系统的采用,其中堆肥谷仓系统脱颖而出。然而,文献提出了受气候、结构和管理变化影响的异质结果,限制了一致技术建议的建立。本研究旨在系统分析奶牛堆肥仓系统的科学生产,确定主题趋势、时间演变、地理分布、主要期刊和作者以及知识差距。系统评价纳入了2015年1月至2025年10月间发表的原创文章,检索自LILACS/BVS、SciELO、ScienceDirect、Scopus、CAPES Journal Portal和PubMed的葡萄牙语、英语和西班牙语版本。从2020年开始,出版物数量大幅增加,在2021年达到峰值,地理分布集中在巴西。专题分析确定了五个主要轴:动物福利和健康、牛奶生产和质量、结构和管理、微生物学和环境影响/可持续性,重点是舒适、健康状况和床褥条件。文献已经从描述性研究发展到更多的分析方法;然而,研究仍然是碎片化的,系统组件之间的集成有限。研究结果表明,堆肥仓应被理解为一个综合的生物系统,涉及微生物、物理化学、管理、动物福利、生产和环境等过程的相互作用。这篇综述通过支持基于证据的管理和可持续战略,为奶农、研究人员和政策制定者提供了实用的见解。其新颖之处在于将堆肥仓作为一个复杂的生物系统而不是孤立的组成部分进行综合分析。未来的研究应优先考虑多学科方法、标准化方法和跨不同生产环境的长期评估。解决这些差距对于提高对堆肥谷仓系统的技术理解、管理和环境可持续性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Quality Management
Environmental Quality Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Four times a year, this practical journal shows you how to improve environmental performance and exceed voluntary standards such as ISO 14000. In each issue, you"ll find in-depth articles and the most current case studies of successful environmental quality improvement efforts -- and guidance on how you can apply these goals to your organization. Written by leading industry experts and practitioners, Environmental Quality Management brings you innovative practices in Performance Measurement...Life-Cycle Assessments...Safety Management... Environmental Auditing...ISO 14000 Standards and Certification..."Green Accounting"...Environmental Communication...Sustainable Development Issues...Environmental Benchmarking...Global Environmental Law and Regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书