A Statistical Framework for Spatial Boundary Estimation and Change Detection: Application to the Sahel–Sahara Climate Transition

IF 1.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmetrics Pub Date : 2026-10-11 DOI:10.1002/env.70154
Stephen Tivenan, Indranil Sahoo, Yanjun Qian
{"title":"A Statistical Framework for Spatial Boundary Estimation and Change Detection: Application to the Sahel–Sahara Climate Transition","authors":"Stephen Tivenan,&nbsp;Indranil Sahoo,&nbsp;Yanjun Qian","doi":"10.1002/env.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Spatial boundaries, such as ecological transitions or climatic regime interfaces, capture steep environmental gradients, and shifts in their structure can signal emerging environmental changes. Quantifying uncertainty in spatial boundary locations and formally testing for temporal shifts remain challenging, especially when boundaries are derived from noisy, gridded environmental data. We present a unified framework that combines heteroskedastic Gaussian process (GP) regression with a scaled maximum absolute difference (MAD) global envelope test (GET) to estimate spatial boundary curves and assess whether they evolve over time. The heteroskedastic GP provides a flexible probabilistic reconstruction of boundary lines, capturing spatially varying mean structure and location-specific variability, while the scaled Maximum Absolute GET test offers a rigorous hypothesis-testing tool for detecting departures from expected boundary behaviors. Simulation studies show that the proposed method achieves the correct size under the null and high power for detecting local boundary shifts. Applying our framework to the Sahel-Sahara transition zone, using annual Köppen-Trewartha climate classifications from 1960 to 1989, we find no statistically significant decade-scale changes in the arid/semi-arid or semi-arid/non-arid interfaces. However, the method successfully identifies localized boundary shifts during the extreme drought years of 1983–1984, consistent with climate studies documenting regional anomalies in these interfaces during that period.</p>","PeriodicalId":50512,"journal":{"name":"Environmetrics","volume":"37 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/env.70154","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmetrics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.70154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spatial boundaries, such as ecological transitions or climatic regime interfaces, capture steep environmental gradients, and shifts in their structure can signal emerging environmental changes. Quantifying uncertainty in spatial boundary locations and formally testing for temporal shifts remain challenging, especially when boundaries are derived from noisy, gridded environmental data. We present a unified framework that combines heteroskedastic Gaussian process (GP) regression with a scaled maximum absolute difference (MAD) global envelope test (GET) to estimate spatial boundary curves and assess whether they evolve over time. The heteroskedastic GP provides a flexible probabilistic reconstruction of boundary lines, capturing spatially varying mean structure and location-specific variability, while the scaled Maximum Absolute GET test offers a rigorous hypothesis-testing tool for detecting departures from expected boundary behaviors. Simulation studies show that the proposed method achieves the correct size under the null and high power for detecting local boundary shifts. Applying our framework to the Sahel-Sahara transition zone, using annual Köppen-Trewartha climate classifications from 1960 to 1989, we find no statistically significant decade-scale changes in the arid/semi-arid or semi-arid/non-arid interfaces. However, the method successfully identifies localized boundary shifts during the extreme drought years of 1983–1984, consistent with climate studies documenting regional anomalies in these interfaces during that period.

空间边界估算与变化检测的统计框架:在萨赫勒-撒哈拉气候过渡中的应用
空间边界,如生态过渡或气候制度界面,捕捉了陡峭的环境梯度,其结构的变化可以标志着正在出现的环境变化。量化空间边界位置的不确定性和对时间变化的正式测试仍然具有挑战性,特别是当边界来自嘈杂的网格化环境数据时。我们提出了一个统一的框架,将异方差高斯过程(GP)回归与标度最大绝对差(MAD)全局包络检验(GET)相结合,以估计空间边界曲线并评估它们是否随时间演变。异方差GP提供了边界线的灵活概率重建,捕获空间变化的平均结构和特定位置的可变性,而缩放的最大绝对GET测试提供了严格的假设测试工具,用于检测与预期边界行为的偏离。仿真研究表明,该方法在零值和高功率下均能达到检测局部边界位移的正确尺寸。将我们的框架应用于萨赫勒-撒哈拉过渡带,使用1960 - 1989年的Köppen-Trewartha年度气候分类,我们发现干旱/半干旱或半干旱/非干旱界面在统计上没有显著的十年尺度变化。然而,该方法成功地识别了1983-1984年极端干旱年间的局部边界移动,与记录该时期这些界面区域异常的气候研究相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmetrics
Environmetrics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmetrics, the official journal of The International Environmetrics Society (TIES), an Association of the International Statistical Institute, is devoted to the dissemination of high-quality quantitative research in the environmental sciences. The journal welcomes pertinent and innovative submissions from quantitative disciplines developing new statistical and mathematical techniques, methods, and theories that solve modern environmental problems. Articles must proffer substantive, new statistical or mathematical advances to answer important scientific questions in the environmental sciences, or must develop novel or enhanced statistical methodology with clear applications to environmental science. New methods should be illustrated with recent environmental data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书