A longitudinal study of predictive relations between imitation and cognitive abilities in 12-, 18-, and 24-month-olds

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Cognitive Development Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cogdev.2026.101794
Maurits Adam, Franziska Sieber, Norbert Zmyj
{"title":"A longitudinal study of predictive relations between imitation and cognitive abilities in 12-, 18-, and 24-month-olds","authors":"Maurits Adam,&nbsp;Franziska Sieber,&nbsp;Norbert Zmyj","doi":"10.1016/j.cogdev.2026.101794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Imitation is a fundamental mechanism of cultural learning, but its underlying cognitive mechanisms remain highly debated. For example, nativist accounts argue that imitation is based on domain-specific learning mechanisms, but empiricist accounts argue that it is based on domain-general learning mechanisms. The present longitudinal study investigated the interplay between imitation and general cognitive abilities across the second year of life. A sample of 143 German children was tested at 12, 18, and 24 months of age. Imitation was measured using the Frankfurt Imitation Test, and cognitive development was measured using the Cognitive Scale of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III. Cross-lagged panel modeling was employed to examine bidirectional associations between imitation behavior and cognitive abilities. Results indicated moderate stability in cognitive abilities across measurements, whereas imitation behavior showed no temporal stability. Critically, cognitive abilities at 18 months significantly predicted imitation at 24 months, but no reverse effects were found. Overall, the findings provide limited and non-systematic support for a predictive relationship between domain-general cognitive abilities and imitation. Although the observed predictive effect is consistent with empiricist accounts emphasizing general learning mechanisms, the lack of significant associations across measurement time points suggests that imitation may not be linked solely to general cognitive development. These results highlight the importance of considering both domain-general and domain-specific contributions to imitation and underscore the need for future research to systematically control for cognitive developmental status when investigating early social-cognitive abilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51422,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Development","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 101794"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201426001255","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Imitation is a fundamental mechanism of cultural learning, but its underlying cognitive mechanisms remain highly debated. For example, nativist accounts argue that imitation is based on domain-specific learning mechanisms, but empiricist accounts argue that it is based on domain-general learning mechanisms. The present longitudinal study investigated the interplay between imitation and general cognitive abilities across the second year of life. A sample of 143 German children was tested at 12, 18, and 24 months of age. Imitation was measured using the Frankfurt Imitation Test, and cognitive development was measured using the Cognitive Scale of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III. Cross-lagged panel modeling was employed to examine bidirectional associations between imitation behavior and cognitive abilities. Results indicated moderate stability in cognitive abilities across measurements, whereas imitation behavior showed no temporal stability. Critically, cognitive abilities at 18 months significantly predicted imitation at 24 months, but no reverse effects were found. Overall, the findings provide limited and non-systematic support for a predictive relationship between domain-general cognitive abilities and imitation. Although the observed predictive effect is consistent with empiricist accounts emphasizing general learning mechanisms, the lack of significant associations across measurement time points suggests that imitation may not be linked solely to general cognitive development. These results highlight the importance of considering both domain-general and domain-specific contributions to imitation and underscore the need for future research to systematically control for cognitive developmental status when investigating early social-cognitive abilities.
12、18、24个月大婴儿模仿与认知能力预测关系的纵向研究
模仿是文化学习的一种基本机制,但其潜在的认知机制仍存在很大争议。例如,本土主义者认为模仿是基于特定领域的学习机制,但经验主义者认为模仿是基于一般领域的学习机制。目前的纵向研究调查了模仿和一般认知能力之间的相互作用在生命的第二年。143名德国儿童分别在12、18和24个月大时接受了测试。模仿采用法兰克福模仿测验,认知发展采用Bayley婴幼儿发展量表III认知量表。采用交叉滞后面板模型检验模仿行为与认知能力之间的双向关联。结果表明,在不同的测量中,认知能力具有中等稳定性,而模仿行为则没有时间稳定性。重要的是,18个月时的认知能力显著预测了24个月时的模仿,但没有发现相反的影响。总的来说,这些发现为领域通用认知能力和模仿之间的预测关系提供了有限的和非系统的支持。尽管观察到的预测效果与强调一般学习机制的经验主义者的说法一致,但在测量时间点上缺乏显著的关联,这表明模仿可能不仅仅与一般认知发展有关。这些结果强调了考虑领域一般和领域特定对模仿的贡献的重要性,并强调了未来研究在调查早期社会认知能力时系统控制认知发展状态的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Cognitive Development contains the very best empirical and theoretical work on the development of perception, memory, language, concepts, thinking, problem solving, metacognition, and social cognition. Criteria for acceptance of articles will be: significance of the work to issues of current interest, substance of the argument, and clarity of expression. For purposes of publication in Cognitive Development, moral and social development will be considered part of cognitive development when they are related to the development of knowledge or thought processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书