Cross-cycle variation in science teachers’ instructional engagement profiles in South Korea: Evidence from TIMSS 2011–2023

IF 2.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Risa Haridza
{"title":"Cross-cycle variation in science teachers’ instructional engagement profiles in South Korea: Evidence from TIMSS 2011–2023","authors":"Risa Haridza","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2026.103679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines cross-cycle variation in South Korean science teachers’ instructional practices across four cycles of the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023). Using science teacher questionnaire data linked to a nationally representative sample of eighth-grade students, this study applied latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify instructional activity profiles and examine descriptive differences in profile distribution across cycles. Results revealed two to three profiles across the four cycles, primarily reflecting varying levels of instructional engagement intensity. Profile distributions differed substantially across cycles, while the profiles differed more in overall instructional intensity than in contrasting pedagogical approaches. Although the data are not longitudinal at the individual level, these findings provide descriptive evidence of cross-cycle variation in instructional practice patterns in the Korean context. This study also explored demographic correlates of profile membership, although most associations were modest in magnitude. By adopting a person-centered approach to large-scale assessment data, this study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of instructional heterogeneity beyond mean-level analyses. These findings may inform context-sensitive professional development and instructional support by highlighting variation in teachers’ levels of instructional engagement across cycles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 103679"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059326001896","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines cross-cycle variation in South Korean science teachers’ instructional practices across four cycles of the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023). Using science teacher questionnaire data linked to a nationally representative sample of eighth-grade students, this study applied latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify instructional activity profiles and examine descriptive differences in profile distribution across cycles. Results revealed two to three profiles across the four cycles, primarily reflecting varying levels of instructional engagement intensity. Profile distributions differed substantially across cycles, while the profiles differed more in overall instructional intensity than in contrasting pedagogical approaches. Although the data are not longitudinal at the individual level, these findings provide descriptive evidence of cross-cycle variation in instructional practice patterns in the Korean context. This study also explored demographic correlates of profile membership, although most associations were modest in magnitude. By adopting a person-centered approach to large-scale assessment data, this study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of instructional heterogeneity beyond mean-level analyses. These findings may inform context-sensitive professional development and instructional support by highlighting variation in teachers’ levels of instructional engagement across cycles.
韩国科学教师教学投入概况的跨周期变化:来自TIMSS 2011-2023的证据
本研究考察了国际数学与科学趋势研究(TIMSS, 2011年、2015年、2019年和2023年)四个周期中韩国科学教师教学实践的跨周期变化。本研究使用科学教师问卷数据与全国代表性的八年级学生样本相关联,应用潜在剖面分析(LPA)来识别教学活动剖面,并检查剖面分布在各个周期中的描述性差异。结果揭示了四个周期中的两到三个概况,主要反映了不同水平的教学参与强度。剖面分布在不同的周期中差异很大,而剖面在总体教学强度上的差异大于对比教学方法上的差异。虽然这些数据在个人层面上不是纵向的,但这些发现为韩国背景下教学实践模式的跨周期变化提供了描述性证据。本研究还探讨了人口统计学相关的概况成员,尽管大多数关联是适度的幅度。本研究采用以人为本的方法处理大规模的评估数据,有助于在平均水平分析之外更全面地了解教学异质性。这些发现可以通过强调教师在不同周期的教学参与水平的变化,为上下文敏感的专业发展和教学支持提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书