Can children generalise newly acquired object categories based on visual and haptic features?

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Cognitive Development Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.cogdev.2026.101791
Eimear M. McKenna, Rebecca, J. Hirst, Fiona N. Newell
{"title":"Can children generalise newly acquired object categories based on visual and haptic features?","authors":"Eimear M. McKenna,&nbsp;Rebecca, J. Hirst,&nbsp;Fiona N. Newell","doi":"10.1016/j.cogdev.2026.101791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although children constantly interact with the objects in their environment using vision and touch, our understanding of how these senses contribute to category formation is relatively poor. Children may find the complementary information about the relevant object features across vision and touch helpful for categorisation. Alternatively, cross-sensory information may increase the search space within which the relevant category features are encoded. The aim of the current experiment was to investigate children’s ability to learn and generalise object categories based on unimodal or bimodal information. Different groups of children aged from 4 to 13 years (<em>N</em> = 246) first learned to categorise novel objects using either vision, haptics or both modalities. Category learning was worst in bimodal conditions in younger children only, but modality had no effect on learning in older children. We then assessed categorisation performance to learned objects and generalisation to novel exemplars defined by a change of object features selected from either within or across categories. Relative to categorisation, generalisation was unaffected by within-category feature changes but reduced by cross-category feature changes. Our results suggest that children’s ability to generalise object categories is best for visual information. Moreover, we found no specific benefit for multisensory information on category learning or generalisation at any age. These findings provide insights into children’s ability to selectively attend and encode object features and suggest an independent influence of vision and touch in the formation of object categories during childhood.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51422,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Development","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 101791"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088520142600122X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although children constantly interact with the objects in their environment using vision and touch, our understanding of how these senses contribute to category formation is relatively poor. Children may find the complementary information about the relevant object features across vision and touch helpful for categorisation. Alternatively, cross-sensory information may increase the search space within which the relevant category features are encoded. The aim of the current experiment was to investigate children’s ability to learn and generalise object categories based on unimodal or bimodal information. Different groups of children aged from 4 to 13 years (N = 246) first learned to categorise novel objects using either vision, haptics or both modalities. Category learning was worst in bimodal conditions in younger children only, but modality had no effect on learning in older children. We then assessed categorisation performance to learned objects and generalisation to novel exemplars defined by a change of object features selected from either within or across categories. Relative to categorisation, generalisation was unaffected by within-category feature changes but reduced by cross-category feature changes. Our results suggest that children’s ability to generalise object categories is best for visual information. Moreover, we found no specific benefit for multisensory information on category learning or generalisation at any age. These findings provide insights into children’s ability to selectively attend and encode object features and suggest an independent influence of vision and touch in the formation of object categories during childhood.
儿童能否根据视觉和触觉特征概括新获得的物体类别?
虽然儿童不断使用视觉和触觉与环境中的物体互动,但我们对这些感官如何促进类别形成的理解相对较差。儿童可能会发现视觉和触觉上有关物体特征的补充信息有助于分类。或者,跨感觉信息可以增加对相关类别特征进行编码的搜索空间。当前实验的目的是调查儿童在单峰或双峰信息的基础上学习和概括物体类别的能力。年龄在4到13岁之间的不同儿童组(N = 246)首先学会使用视觉、触觉或两种方式对新物体进行分类。在双峰条件下,类别学习仅在年龄较小的儿童中最差,但在年龄较大的儿童中,模态对学习没有影响。然后,我们评估了对学习对象的分类性能,并通过从类别内或跨类别中选择的对象特征的变化来定义对新样本的概括。相对于分类,概括性不受类别内特征变化的影响,但受跨类别特征变化的影响。我们的研究结果表明,儿童概括物体类别的能力最适合视觉信息。此外,我们发现在任何年龄,多感官信息对类别学习或泛化都没有特别的好处。这些发现为儿童选择性关注和编码物体特征的能力提供了见解,并表明儿童时期视觉和触觉对物体类别形成的独立影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Cognitive Development contains the very best empirical and theoretical work on the development of perception, memory, language, concepts, thinking, problem solving, metacognition, and social cognition. Criteria for acceptance of articles will be: significance of the work to issues of current interest, substance of the argument, and clarity of expression. For purposes of publication in Cognitive Development, moral and social development will be considered part of cognitive development when they are related to the development of knowledge or thought processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书