Evidence-based design of a patient-specific quality assurance program through retrospective analysis of pretreatment and in vivo results

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Esther Decabooter, Sebastiaan M.J.J.G. Nijsten
{"title":"Evidence-based design of a patient-specific quality assurance program through retrospective analysis of pretreatment and in vivo results","authors":"Esther Decabooter,&nbsp;Sebastiaan M.J.J.G. Nijsten","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2026.101106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>As radiotherapy techniques become increasingly complex, patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) must evolve to detect a broad spectrum of potential failure modes across the treatment chain. This study presents a extensive evaluation of a multi-modal PSQA program by assessing its ability to detect clinically relevant failure modes and quantifying its efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A five-year retrospective analysis was conducted of an integrated PSQA program implemented at Maastro, combining secondary dose calculations, log-file based verification, and Electronic Portal Dosimetry (EPD) in both pretreatment and <em>in vivo</em> workflows. The efficacy of individual QA methods and the overall program was quantified using positive predictive values (PPVs). PSQA outcomes were linked to potential improvements in treatment planning strategies and delivery techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 18,558 treatment plans were analyzed in the pretreatment workflow and 1817 treatment plans in the <em>in vivo</em> workflow. Nearly all high-priority failure modes could be detected except machine output miscalibration. Combining PSQA methods substantially improved PPVs across failure categories. The <em>in vivo</em> workflow flagged the most failure modes and additionally gives insight into possible improvements in planning strategies or treatment techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This retrospective analysis demonstrated that a comprehensive framework incorporating independent, purpose-specific PSQA methods is essential to detect a wide range of treatment deviations. Combining complementary methods improves the reliability and interpretability of results. The clinical impact of a PSQA program can be further enhanced by adopting more clinically meaningful evaluation metrics and using the results to guide the optimization of new treatment strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563162600206X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

As radiotherapy techniques become increasingly complex, patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) must evolve to detect a broad spectrum of potential failure modes across the treatment chain. This study presents a extensive evaluation of a multi-modal PSQA program by assessing its ability to detect clinically relevant failure modes and quantifying its efficacy.

Materials and Methods

A five-year retrospective analysis was conducted of an integrated PSQA program implemented at Maastro, combining secondary dose calculations, log-file based verification, and Electronic Portal Dosimetry (EPD) in both pretreatment and in vivo workflows. The efficacy of individual QA methods and the overall program was quantified using positive predictive values (PPVs). PSQA outcomes were linked to potential improvements in treatment planning strategies and delivery techniques.

Results

A total of 18,558 treatment plans were analyzed in the pretreatment workflow and 1817 treatment plans in the in vivo workflow. Nearly all high-priority failure modes could be detected except machine output miscalibration. Combining PSQA methods substantially improved PPVs across failure categories. The in vivo workflow flagged the most failure modes and additionally gives insight into possible improvements in planning strategies or treatment techniques.

Conclusions

This retrospective analysis demonstrated that a comprehensive framework incorporating independent, purpose-specific PSQA methods is essential to detect a wide range of treatment deviations. Combining complementary methods improves the reliability and interpretability of results. The clinical impact of a PSQA program can be further enhanced by adopting more clinically meaningful evaluation metrics and using the results to guide the optimization of new treatment strategies.
通过对预处理和体内结果的回顾性分析,对患者特异性质量保证方案进行循证设计
背景和目的随着放疗技术变得越来越复杂,患者特异性质量保证(PSQA)必须不断发展,以检测整个治疗链中广泛的潜在失效模式。本研究通过评估其检测临床相关失效模式的能力和量化其疗效,对多模式PSQA程序进行了广泛的评估。材料和方法对Maastro实施的综合PSQA项目进行了为期五年的回顾性分析,结合了预处理和体内工作流程中的二次剂量计算、基于日志文件的验证和电子门户剂量测定(EPD)。采用阳性预测值(positive predictive values, ppv)对单个QA方法和整体方案的有效性进行量化。PSQA结果与治疗计划策略和交付技术的潜在改进有关。结果预处理流程共分析了18558个治疗方案,体内流程共分析了1817个治疗方案。除了机器输出校准错误外,几乎所有高优先级故障模式都可以检测到。结合PSQA方法大大提高了跨故障类别的ppv。体内工作流程标记了大多数失效模式,并为计划策略或治疗技术的可能改进提供了见解。这一回顾性分析表明,一个综合的框架,包括独立的、特定目的的PSQA方法,对于发现大范围的治疗偏差是必不可少的。互补方法的结合提高了结果的可靠性和可解释性。采用更多有临床意义的评价指标,并利用结果指导新的治疗策略的优化,可以进一步提高PSQA项目的临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书