Joel Beaudry, Tonghe Wang, Shirin A. Enger, Antonio L. Damato
{"title":"Three-dimensional deep learning nomogram for post-plan quality assurance in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy","authors":"Joel Beaudry, Tonghe Wang, Shirin A. Enger, Antonio L. Damato","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2026.101100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Classical nomograms for high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy quality assurance (QA) evaluate agreement between planned and expected total dwell time but do not directly assess the three-dimensional treated volume. This study's aim was to develop a deep learning-based 3D nomogram to predict institution-specific clinical 100% isodose volumes from anatomy and dwell positions for post-plan QA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 2394 single-fraction 15 Gy HDR prostate brachytherapy plans were included. Input label maps encoded the 3D prostate, urethra, rectum, and dwell positions. The prediction target was the clinical 100% isodose volume. A five-fold cross-validation strategy was used for model development, with 2155 plans used for training and validation and 239 plans held out for testing. A 3D U-Net was trained using combined Dice and binary cross-entropy loss. Agreement was evaluated using prostate V100%, 100% isodose volume, Dice similarity coefficient, and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD). Validation-derived thresholds were used for outlier screening and targeted review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model predicted prostate V100% with a mean error of 0.73 percentage points. Predicted and clinical 100% isodose volumes showed strong agreement, with R<sup>2</sup> = 0.990, slope = 0.99, and intercept = 0.77 cm<sup>3</sup>. Median Dice similarity coefficient was 0.960, and median ASSD was 0.48 mm. A 95% threshold flagged 6.3% of plans as atypical relative to validation data.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A deep learning-based nomogram predicted an institution-specific 100% isodose volume with low coverage error and high spatial agreement. This geometry aware post-plan QA tool can complement equation-based nomograms by directly evaluating the spatial treated volume.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631626002009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Classical nomograms for high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy quality assurance (QA) evaluate agreement between planned and expected total dwell time but do not directly assess the three-dimensional treated volume. This study's aim was to develop a deep learning-based 3D nomogram to predict institution-specific clinical 100% isodose volumes from anatomy and dwell positions for post-plan QA.
Methods
A total of 2394 single-fraction 15 Gy HDR prostate brachytherapy plans were included. Input label maps encoded the 3D prostate, urethra, rectum, and dwell positions. The prediction target was the clinical 100% isodose volume. A five-fold cross-validation strategy was used for model development, with 2155 plans used for training and validation and 239 plans held out for testing. A 3D U-Net was trained using combined Dice and binary cross-entropy loss. Agreement was evaluated using prostate V100%, 100% isodose volume, Dice similarity coefficient, and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD). Validation-derived thresholds were used for outlier screening and targeted review.
Results
The model predicted prostate V100% with a mean error of 0.73 percentage points. Predicted and clinical 100% isodose volumes showed strong agreement, with R2 = 0.990, slope = 0.99, and intercept = 0.77 cm3. Median Dice similarity coefficient was 0.960, and median ASSD was 0.48 mm. A 95% threshold flagged 6.3% of plans as atypical relative to validation data.
Conclusions
A deep learning-based nomogram predicted an institution-specific 100% isodose volume with low coverage error and high spatial agreement. This geometry aware post-plan QA tool can complement equation-based nomograms by directly evaluating the spatial treated volume.