Postural control alterations after severe COVID-19 in older adults using smartphone-based assessment of trunk responses to mechanical perturbations

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Manuela Brito Duarte, Aymee Lobato Brito, Gizele Cristina da Silva Almeida, Jéssica Cristina Santos de Assis, Nathalya Ingrid Cardoso Do Nascimento, Gustavo Marques Rocha, Givago Silva Souza, Bianca Callegari
{"title":"Postural control alterations after severe COVID-19 in older adults using smartphone-based assessment of trunk responses to mechanical perturbations","authors":"Manuela Brito Duarte,&nbsp;Aymee Lobato Brito,&nbsp;Gizele Cristina da Silva Almeida,&nbsp;Jéssica Cristina Santos de Assis,&nbsp;Nathalya Ingrid Cardoso Do Nascimento,&nbsp;Gustavo Marques Rocha,&nbsp;Givago Silva Souza,&nbsp;Bianca Callegari","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2026.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Older adults recovering from severe COVID-19 may present persistent postural control impairments that increase fall risk, yet anticipatory and compensatory responses to external perturbations remain poorly understood.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate postural adjustments during predictable trunk perturbations in older adults with a history of severe COVID-19 and examine agreement between smartphone-derived measurements and a three-dimensional motion capture system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-seven older adults were allocated to a Healthy Group (HG, n = 18) and a Post-COVID Severe Group (PCG, n = 9). Predictable anteroposterior trunk perturbations were delivered by a pendulum, with simultaneous L5 acceleration recordings using motion capture (120 Hz) and a smartphone accelerometer (50 Hz). Outcomes included APA<sub>onset</sub>, APA<sub>amplitude</sub>, CPA<sub>range</sub> and CPA<sub>restabtime</sub>. Group comparisons were corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR). Instrument agreement was assessed using Spearman's coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PCG showed earlier APA<sub>onset</sub> and longer CPA<sub>restabtime</sub> than the HG. No significant differences were found for APA<sub>amplitude</sub> or CPA<sub>range</sub>, although the 95% CIs of the corresponding effect sizes were wide, precluding firm conclusions about the absence of group differences. Smartphone and motion capture measurements showed moderate-to-strong correlations, whereas ICC values were lower, particularly in the PCG. The significant between-group difference in CPA<sub>restabtime</sub> was detected only by the kinematic reference system. Findings should be interpreted considering the modest sample size, particularly in the PCG.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Older adults recovering from severe COVID-19 exhibit altered postural responses. Smartphone inertial sensors showed acceptable agreement for some variables but should be used cautiously in post-COVID assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"48 ","pages":"Pages 1883-1892"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859226003396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Older adults recovering from severe COVID-19 may present persistent postural control impairments that increase fall risk, yet anticipatory and compensatory responses to external perturbations remain poorly understood.

Objective

To investigate postural adjustments during predictable trunk perturbations in older adults with a history of severe COVID-19 and examine agreement between smartphone-derived measurements and a three-dimensional motion capture system.

Methods

Twenty-seven older adults were allocated to a Healthy Group (HG, n = 18) and a Post-COVID Severe Group (PCG, n = 9). Predictable anteroposterior trunk perturbations were delivered by a pendulum, with simultaneous L5 acceleration recordings using motion capture (120 Hz) and a smartphone accelerometer (50 Hz). Outcomes included APAonset, APAamplitude, CPArange and CPArestabtime. Group comparisons were corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR). Instrument agreement was assessed using Spearman's coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

The PCG showed earlier APAonset and longer CPArestabtime than the HG. No significant differences were found for APAamplitude or CPArange, although the 95% CIs of the corresponding effect sizes were wide, precluding firm conclusions about the absence of group differences. Smartphone and motion capture measurements showed moderate-to-strong correlations, whereas ICC values were lower, particularly in the PCG. The significant between-group difference in CPArestabtime was detected only by the kinematic reference system. Findings should be interpreted considering the modest sample size, particularly in the PCG.

Conclusion

Older adults recovering from severe COVID-19 exhibit altered postural responses. Smartphone inertial sensors showed acceptable agreement for some variables but should be used cautiously in post-COVID assessment.
使用基于智能手机的躯干对机械扰动反应评估老年人严重COVID-19后的姿势控制改变
从严重COVID-19中恢复的老年人可能出现持续的姿势控制障碍,从而增加跌倒的风险,但对外部扰动的预期和代偿反应仍知之甚少。目的研究具有严重COVID-19病史的老年人在可预测的躯干扰动期间的姿势调整,并检查智能手机衍生测量与三维运动捕捉系统之间的一致性。方法将27例老年人分为健康组(HG, n = 18)和重症组(PCG, n = 9)。可预测的前后躯干扰动由钟摆传递,同时使用运动捕捉(120 Hz)和智能手机加速度计(50 Hz)记录L5加速度。结果包括aponset、apamplitude、CPArange和aparestabtime。使用Benjamini-Hochberg错误发现率(FDR)校正组间比较。使用Spearman系数、类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析评估仪器一致性。效应量(Hedges' g)以95%置信区间(ci)报告。结果PCG组apaponset较HG组早,apaparestabtime较HG组长,apapamplitude和CPArange组无显著性差异,但相应效应量的95% ci较宽,排除了没有组间差异的确切结论。智能手机和动作捕捉测量显示出中等到强烈的相关性,而ICC值较低,特别是在PCG中。仅通过运动学参考系统检测到CPArestabtime组间显著差异。研究结果应考虑到适度的样本量,特别是在PCG中。结论重症COVID-19恢复期老年人体位反应发生改变。智能手机惯性传感器在某些变量上显示出可接受的一致性,但在covid后评估中应谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书