Place, space, and scale: A meta-theoretical geographic framework for understanding industrial decarbonisation in Australia

IF 9.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Geography and Sustainability Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100549
Joao M. Uratani, Marfuga Iskandarova, Benjamin K. Sovacool, Steve Griffiths
{"title":"Place, space, and scale: A meta-theoretical geographic framework for understanding industrial decarbonisation in Australia","authors":"Joao M. Uratani,&nbsp;Marfuga Iskandarova,&nbsp;Benjamin K. Sovacool,&nbsp;Steve Griffiths","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The decarbonisation of heavy industries is a key challenge in ongoing climate action and policy. These industries, also referred to as “hard-to-abate”, require significant technological, economic and political support to align with net zero greenhouse gas transition pathways. The understanding of such sustainability transitions, generally, is a fertile area of scholarly research and practice, yet considerations for the geographic aspects of these processes are only more recently being brought to the forefront. Hence, the present work contributes to addressing this gap by adopting a composite, Human Geography-oriented lens to understand industrial decarbonisation processes in a case study country. We investigate industrial decarbonisation in Australia using Geography of Energy Transitions, Net Zero Sense of Place and Global Innovation Systems frameworks to understand the regional diversity within Australia of such decarbonisation processes. We identify twelve themes in our primary data consisting of stakeholder interviews and field work site visits, which are organised in four core thematic groups, namely place, space, scale and innovation systems. By assessing these themes through our composite lens consisting of twenty analytical dimensions stemming from the three analytical lenses, we find that the regional differences in industrial decarbonisation within Australia can be understood as one of six regional decarbonisation archetypes. This composite lens further enables strategic decision-making and policy action that is cognisant of local-context factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 100549"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683926001446","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decarbonisation of heavy industries is a key challenge in ongoing climate action and policy. These industries, also referred to as “hard-to-abate”, require significant technological, economic and political support to align with net zero greenhouse gas transition pathways. The understanding of such sustainability transitions, generally, is a fertile area of scholarly research and practice, yet considerations for the geographic aspects of these processes are only more recently being brought to the forefront. Hence, the present work contributes to addressing this gap by adopting a composite, Human Geography-oriented lens to understand industrial decarbonisation processes in a case study country. We investigate industrial decarbonisation in Australia using Geography of Energy Transitions, Net Zero Sense of Place and Global Innovation Systems frameworks to understand the regional diversity within Australia of such decarbonisation processes. We identify twelve themes in our primary data consisting of stakeholder interviews and field work site visits, which are organised in four core thematic groups, namely place, space, scale and innovation systems. By assessing these themes through our composite lens consisting of twenty analytical dimensions stemming from the three analytical lenses, we find that the regional differences in industrial decarbonisation within Australia can be understood as one of six regional decarbonisation archetypes. This composite lens further enables strategic decision-making and policy action that is cognisant of local-context factors.
地点、空间和规模:理解澳大利亚工业脱碳的元理论地理框架
重工业的脱碳是当前气候行动和政策的一个关键挑战。这些行业也被称为“难以减排”的行业,需要大量的技术、经济和政治支持,才能与净零温室气体转型路径保持一致。一般来说,对这种可持续性转变的理解是学术研究和实践的一个丰富领域,但对这些过程的地理方面的考虑只是最近才被带到最前沿。因此,本研究通过采用以人文地理为导向的复合视角来了解案例研究国家的工业脱碳过程,有助于解决这一差距。我们使用能源转型地理学、净零地点感和全球创新系统框架来研究澳大利亚的工业脱碳,以了解澳大利亚境内这种脱碳过程的区域多样性。我们在主要数据中确定了12个主题,包括利益相关者访谈和实地工作现场访问,这些主题分为四个核心主题组,即地点、空间、规模和创新系统。通过我们的复合镜头(由三个分析镜头产生的二十个分析维度组成)评估这些主题,我们发现澳大利亚工业脱碳的区域差异可以被理解为六个区域脱碳原型之一。这一复合镜头进一步促进了认识到当地环境因素的战略决策和政策行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书