Joao M. Uratani, Marfuga Iskandarova, Benjamin K. Sovacool, Steve Griffiths
{"title":"Place, space, and scale: A meta-theoretical geographic framework for understanding industrial decarbonisation in Australia","authors":"Joao M. Uratani, Marfuga Iskandarova, Benjamin K. Sovacool, Steve Griffiths","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The decarbonisation of heavy industries is a key challenge in ongoing climate action and policy. These industries, also referred to as “hard-to-abate”, require significant technological, economic and political support to align with net zero greenhouse gas transition pathways. The understanding of such sustainability transitions, generally, is a fertile area of scholarly research and practice, yet considerations for the geographic aspects of these processes are only more recently being brought to the forefront. Hence, the present work contributes to addressing this gap by adopting a composite, Human Geography-oriented lens to understand industrial decarbonisation processes in a case study country. We investigate industrial decarbonisation in Australia using Geography of Energy Transitions, Net Zero Sense of Place and Global Innovation Systems frameworks to understand the regional diversity within Australia of such decarbonisation processes. We identify twelve themes in our primary data consisting of stakeholder interviews and field work site visits, which are organised in four core thematic groups, namely place, space, scale and innovation systems. By assessing these themes through our composite lens consisting of twenty analytical dimensions stemming from the three analytical lenses, we find that the regional differences in industrial decarbonisation within Australia can be understood as one of six regional decarbonisation archetypes. This composite lens further enables strategic decision-making and policy action that is cognisant of local-context factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"7 5","pages":"Article 100549"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683926001446","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The decarbonisation of heavy industries is a key challenge in ongoing climate action and policy. These industries, also referred to as “hard-to-abate”, require significant technological, economic and political support to align with net zero greenhouse gas transition pathways. The understanding of such sustainability transitions, generally, is a fertile area of scholarly research and practice, yet considerations for the geographic aspects of these processes are only more recently being brought to the forefront. Hence, the present work contributes to addressing this gap by adopting a composite, Human Geography-oriented lens to understand industrial decarbonisation processes in a case study country. We investigate industrial decarbonisation in Australia using Geography of Energy Transitions, Net Zero Sense of Place and Global Innovation Systems frameworks to understand the regional diversity within Australia of such decarbonisation processes. We identify twelve themes in our primary data consisting of stakeholder interviews and field work site visits, which are organised in four core thematic groups, namely place, space, scale and innovation systems. By assessing these themes through our composite lens consisting of twenty analytical dimensions stemming from the three analytical lenses, we find that the regional differences in industrial decarbonisation within Australia can be understood as one of six regional decarbonisation archetypes. This composite lens further enables strategic decision-making and policy action that is cognisant of local-context factors.
期刊介绍:
Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues.
Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes:
Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations;
Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability;
Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing;
Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.