Transition readiness in adolescents with congenital heart disease during transfer to adult care: A secondary analysis of the STEPSTONES randomized controlled trial
Hilda Malmesjö, Mariela Acuna Mora, Ewa-Lena Bratt, Carina Sparud-Lundin, Philip Moons, Markus Saarijärvi PhD, RN
{"title":"Transition readiness in adolescents with congenital heart disease during transfer to adult care: A secondary analysis of the STEPSTONES randomized controlled trial","authors":"Hilda Malmesjö, Mariela Acuna Mora, Ewa-Lena Bratt, Carina Sparud-Lundin, Philip Moons, Markus Saarijärvi PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.hctj.2026.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Adolescents with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk of discontinuity of care during transfer from pediatric to adult services. Transition readiness is considered essential for a safe transfer. This study evaluated the effect of the STEPSTONES person-centered transition program on adolescents’ self-reported transition readiness compared with usual care.</div></div><div><h3>Design and methods</h3><div>This secondary analysis was based on a randomized controlled trial conducted at two Swedish CHD centers. A total of 139 adolescents (age 16 years) were randomized to intervention (n = 70) or usual care (n = 69). The intervention group received the STEPSTONES program in addition to usual care over two years. Transition readiness was assessed at ages 16 (T0), 17 (T1), and 18.5 (T2) using the Readiness for Transition Questionnaire. Between-group differences were analyzed with Mann–Whitney U tests, and longitudinal changes were examined using mixed-design ANOVA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At T2, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher overall transition readiness compared with controls (p = .011–.015), with a small effect size (r ≈ .23–.24). A significant main effect of time was found (p < .001), indicating increased readiness across adolescence in both groups. No significant group-by-time interaction was detected (p = .177), and no differences were identified at the level of individual questionnaire items.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The STEPSTONES program was associated with higher overall transition readiness at the time of transfer, although effect sizes were small. Structured, person-centered transition programs may enhance preparedness for adult care.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>Pediatric nurses are key in supporting transition readiness. Structured transition programs may strengthen adolescents’ overall preparedness for adult-oriented healthcare.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02675361.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100602,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Transitions","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949923226000279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Adolescents with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk of discontinuity of care during transfer from pediatric to adult services. Transition readiness is considered essential for a safe transfer. This study evaluated the effect of the STEPSTONES person-centered transition program on adolescents’ self-reported transition readiness compared with usual care.
Design and methods
This secondary analysis was based on a randomized controlled trial conducted at two Swedish CHD centers. A total of 139 adolescents (age 16 years) were randomized to intervention (n = 70) or usual care (n = 69). The intervention group received the STEPSTONES program in addition to usual care over two years. Transition readiness was assessed at ages 16 (T0), 17 (T1), and 18.5 (T2) using the Readiness for Transition Questionnaire. Between-group differences were analyzed with Mann–Whitney U tests, and longitudinal changes were examined using mixed-design ANOVA.
Results
At T2, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher overall transition readiness compared with controls (p = .011–.015), with a small effect size (r ≈ .23–.24). A significant main effect of time was found (p < .001), indicating increased readiness across adolescence in both groups. No significant group-by-time interaction was detected (p = .177), and no differences were identified at the level of individual questionnaire items.
Conclusions
The STEPSTONES program was associated with higher overall transition readiness at the time of transfer, although effect sizes were small. Structured, person-centered transition programs may enhance preparedness for adult care.
Practice implications
Pediatric nurses are key in supporting transition readiness. Structured transition programs may strengthen adolescents’ overall preparedness for adult-oriented healthcare.